Topic: Yumerium and bounty hunters - Looks like a SCAM - page 2. (Read 1066 times)
I think that changing the project's plan and perspective is unethical way and also a fraudulent act. I also think that every project on bounty campaigns seems like this, they promise to give these and that but it is not implemented upon the project is finished. So in that case, we must be choosy on participating good bounty campaign. Not just enlightened by their plans and by their project allocation.
Almost similar to glitzkoin but it seems like it is worse than that, I don't understand why the project handled by amazix this year is a lot of problems
Amazix abandoned this project and another manager led the second round. Which by the way tried to reason with the team and was on the side of the hunters for generosity. so managers have nothing to do with it. blame the developers who were scoundrels. 
Too many scams for now. in my opinion now I have to be careful and selective if we want to join the bounty campaign. because now there are a lot of deceptive projects
many people have complained about the many frauds that exist
many people have complained about the many frauds that exist
I also heard that this project was a scam. true or not - we'll see
-snip-
Well, it depends on the reason why the participant's payment was reduced in the first place and that does not necessarily make them a scam. Unless it was not mentioned at first, but these days in most bounties, I am sure a lot of people who read rules often would have come across the aspect where the team always mentions that they have the right to make changes to payment in the long run based on the number of participants. So, if you were not comfortable with that you should not have joined, the problem is that a lot of you usually don't read rules.Nonetheless, it is nothing new today that most of the projects we get to see today are being organized by fraudsters, which is why you should always try as much as possible to do your due diligence first.
Almost similar to glitzkoin but it seems like it is worse than that, I don't understand why the project handled by amazix this year is a lot of problems
I am very happy to see how many people have become more active towards the actions of the Yumerium project team, because today such actions are very common. We are bounty hunters, we need to unite in order to prove that it is impossible to do this to us.
Almost all projects have such loopholes. But there are some human relationships, except this. We helped to promote the project for almost half a year, and finally we received from the administration a such kind of ingratitude. If they have done such a thing to people who believed in their project at the early stage, then how they will behave with investors.
It seems to me that many here are mistaken or do not understand what they are talking about. They confuse Fraud and Meanness. The developers of the Yumerium project are scoundrels, but I have no right to call them scammers.
This is their rule:
YUM, Yumerium Token is a gaming token that can be earned by playing, sharing, and reviewing games and spent in any game that supports Yumerium. Game developers can use YUM to attract and engage with users by using marketing tools such as referral bonus or airdrop/bounty campaign.
A total of 2% (12,676,274 YUM) of the total token supply will be assigned to the Bounty Pool.
The program will run until the end of the Token Sale (24.07.2018). Payments will be made 30 days after the completion of the ICO. Pool divided between bounty rounds 50/50.
Distribution of rewards for the Bounty campaign:
1 Round: 6.338.137 YUM (1%)
2 Round: 6.338.137 YUM (1%)
But they only counted for all round is 263620YUM
I think they scam bounty
YUM, Yumerium Token is a gaming token that can be earned by playing, sharing, and reviewing games and spent in any game that supports Yumerium. Game developers can use YUM to attract and engage with users by using marketing tools such as referral bonus or airdrop/bounty campaign.
A total of 2% (12,676,274 YUM) of the total token supply will be assigned to the Bounty Pool.
The program will run until the end of the Token Sale (24.07.2018). Payments will be made 30 days after the completion of the ICO. Pool divided between bounty rounds 50/50.
Distribution of rewards for the Bounty campaign:
1 Round: 6.338.137 YUM (1%)
2 Round: 6.338.137 YUM (1%)
But they only counted for all round is 263620YUM
I think they scam bounty
Hi, GREENch!
I'm, yura04071989, conducted YUMERIUM bounty Round 2. The entire bounty campaign was calculated and even more, given the incorrect assessment of the first round of content creation - we rechecked it for free at the request of the bounty members. On October 26, all google forms and spreadsheets were counted and transferred to the YUMERIUM team. Our work on this was completed and according to the CEO's distribution of tokens was supposed to begin within a week from the moment of transfer. Then in the bounty management chat, a message was received from the CEO that 2% could not be distributed. We provided all the arguments regarding the fact that the company does not fulfill its obligations to the participants of the bounty. Considering the situation on the market and a small volume of sales, we proposed to make the distribution of tokens in parts, or freeze the tokens of the participants of the bounty and unfreeze them after a lapse of time, but pay the participants' reward in full. The team said that would think about this option.
A few days later, the team wrote that they finally decided that in this situation, some of the tokens will be burned and the bounty payment will be 2% from 26,362,027.94 YUM. And they ask us to remove the size of the bounty pool and the related figures from the bounty thread to avoid misunderstandings due to changes.
1)We did not change Bounty thread!
2)We also didn't ban participants who express their opinions either in the main chat or in the Bounty chat.
In the picture above, there are 2 figures:
263620.3 - the amount that the team left for bounty round 2 (similar to round 1)
and 6338137 - the amount that we left in the cap since this was the initial condition that the campaign refused to fulfill.
Unfortunately, this decision of the project team, on which neither the first round team or the second round bounty team can in any way influence, our opinion is extremely negative about this attitude of the development team towards the participants of the bounty and they (the development team) know about it.
Hi, yura04071989.I'm, yura04071989, conducted YUMERIUM bounty Round 2. The entire bounty campaign was calculated and even more, given the incorrect assessment of the first round of content creation - we rechecked it for free at the request of the bounty members. On October 26, all google forms and spreadsheets were counted and transferred to the YUMERIUM team. Our work on this was completed and according to the CEO's distribution of tokens was supposed to begin within a week from the moment of transfer. Then in the bounty management chat, a message was received from the CEO that 2% could not be distributed. We provided all the arguments regarding the fact that the company does not fulfill its obligations to the participants of the bounty. Considering the situation on the market and a small volume of sales, we proposed to make the distribution of tokens in parts, or freeze the tokens of the participants of the bounty and unfreeze them after a lapse of time, but pay the participants' reward in full. The team said that would think about this option.
A few days later, the team wrote that they finally decided that in this situation, some of the tokens will be burned and the bounty payment will be 2% from 26,362,027.94 YUM. And they ask us to remove the size of the bounty pool and the related figures from the bounty thread to avoid misunderstandings due to changes.
1)We did not change Bounty thread!
2)We also didn't ban participants who express their opinions either in the main chat or in the Bounty chat.
In the picture above, there are 2 figures:
263620.3 - the amount that the team left for bounty round 2 (similar to round 1)
and 6338137 - the amount that we left in the cap since this was the initial condition that the campaign refused to fulfill.
Unfortunately, this decision of the project team, on which neither the first round team or the second round bounty team can in any way influence, our opinion is extremely negative about this attitude of the development team towards the participants of the bounty and they (the development team) know about it.
Thank you for explaining the situation. It would be nice if you could attach screenshots of the negotiations with the development team. I think that on the basis of these data, everyone who wants to show the true face of the YUMERIUM project will be able to write articles. It will also be possible to send the material to well-known crypto publishers for publication.
Many of us tried to negotiate for compensation but it wasn't successful. We didn't have a good reply from the team abd most of the bounty hunters are banned from the Telegram chat. This is very bad.
ICO must understand that positive bounty hunters will write about it in the hundreds of sources, when they making unfair moves they will say about this thousand places. Crypto community is quite small, and doing such things will show everybody their real attitude to the community. In fact I don't know about this ICO anything, but I will remember and never buy them or participate their further events.
Well, another ico choose to scam bounty hunters. Not unexpected unfortunately.
Did they reach the hard cap? Or are they giving out tokens with the ratio of raised money compared the hard cap?
Did they reach the hard cap? Or are they giving out tokens with the ratio of raised money compared the hard cap?
The bounty manager didn’t completely blame it. Each had a choice and opportunity not to take part in the bounty campaign.
By the rules of clause 2, the developers left a spare option for deceiving the hunters - but the hunters decided to take part in the bounty themselves.
P.S. For the future, bounty hunters need to learn more about bounty campaigns and not to participate if they are not completely sure.
By the rules of clause 2, the developers left a spare option for deceiving the hunters - but the hunters decided to take part in the bounty themselves.
P.S. For the future, bounty hunters need to learn more about bounty campaigns and not to participate if they are not completely sure.
Once again, carefully re-reading the conditions of participation in the bounty campaign, I come to the conclusion that we can not say that the project SCAM, as they left a loophole:
If we talk about the fact that the project management can be trusted, or I would dare to invest my money in them, then definitely not. But in fact, they did not violate the conditions of the bounty campaign.
If we talk about the fact that the project management can be trusted, or I would dare to invest my money in them, then definitely not. But in fact, they did not violate the conditions of the bounty campaign.
That's very ugly and unacceptable so if they change their rule and say we did not hit hardcap so no bounty hunters will be going to get their rewards is that acceptable they can change the rules but not about giving rewards to bounty hunters, bounty manager should be the one to blame if rewards are changed after the ICO.
project developers behaved very ugly towards the people who helped them. With this act they have spoiled their reputation. Now, no self-respecting investor will pay attention to this project.
I am participated in the first round of his bounty campaign.
How i understand they want to pay 2% from raised funds, and if they sold small amount of tokens, then there all is fair, or i am not understand something ?
How i understand they want to pay 2% from raised funds, and if they sold small amount of tokens, then there all is fair, or i am not understand something ?
indeed the team was not open, they should have said what was the biggest problem with the project, so they distributed their tokens dishonestly. or indeed from the beginning they intend to deceive all participants
All we can make now - it is tell everyone that this project is a full bullshit, and there is no good future here. Because if you start with a fraud - you product will die very very soon. Bounty participants have helped this project to raise money - and Yumerium abused us! 
indeed the team was not open, they should have said what was the biggest problem with the project, so they distributed their tokens dishonestly. or indeed from the beginning they intend to deceive all participants
I saw the yumerium having problems from the first time ico was held. yes, I forgot to read it on meta, if I'm not mistaken but it seems true that this ico has a problem. maybe you should discuss with the team and the developer
however, if sales do not reach the target, this is common
(please correct if I'm wrong).
Jump to: