I am ot be surprised from project wich postpone their ICO, cant collect moneys, change bounty managing team.
There is many scam signals duing ico
Topic: Yumerium and bounty hunters - Looks like a SCAM - page 3. (Read 1107 times)
many projects do bad things on bounty hunters, not only Yumerium, whether it's from the team or cheating game bounty manager, indeed we have been required to be honest about being hunters, while those who make their own rules actually violate them
I did not expect such a trick. Although I was a little tense when the Amazix stopped working on Yumerium. I think that the bounty manager has nothing to do with it, all responsibility lies directly with the team
Hi, GREENch!
I'm, yura04071989, conducted YUMERIUM bounty Round 2. The entire bounty campaign was calculated and even more, given the incorrect assessment of the first round of content creation - we rechecked it for free at the request of the bounty members. On October 26, all google forms and spreadsheets were counted and transferred to the YUMERIUM team. Our work on this was completed and according to the CEO's distribution of tokens was supposed to begin within a week from the moment of transfer. Then in the bounty management chat, a message was received from the CEO that 2% could not be distributed. We provided all the arguments regarding the fact that the company does not fulfill its obligations to the participants of the bounty. Considering the situation on the market and a small volume of sales, we proposed to make the distribution of tokens in parts, or freeze the tokens of the participants of the bounty and unfreeze them after a lapse of time, but pay the participants' reward in full. The team said that would think about this option.
A few days later, the team wrote that they finally decided that in this situation, some of the tokens will be burned and the bounty payment will be 2% from 26,362,027.94 YUM. And they ask us to remove the size of the bounty pool and the related figures from the bounty thread to avoid misunderstandings due to changes.
1)We did not change Bounty thread!
2)We also didn't ban participants who express their opinions either in the main chat or in the Bounty chat.
In the picture above, there are 2 figures:
263620.3 - the amount that the team left for bounty round 2 (similar to round 1)
and 6338137 - the amount that we left in the cap since this was the initial condition that the campaign refused to fulfill.
Unfortunately, this decision of the project team, on which neither the first round team or the second round bounty team can in any way influence, our opinion is extremely negative about this attitude of the development team towards the participants of the bounty and they (the development team) know about it.
Hi, yura04071989.I'm, yura04071989, conducted YUMERIUM bounty Round 2. The entire bounty campaign was calculated and even more, given the incorrect assessment of the first round of content creation - we rechecked it for free at the request of the bounty members. On October 26, all google forms and spreadsheets were counted and transferred to the YUMERIUM team. Our work on this was completed and according to the CEO's distribution of tokens was supposed to begin within a week from the moment of transfer. Then in the bounty management chat, a message was received from the CEO that 2% could not be distributed. We provided all the arguments regarding the fact that the company does not fulfill its obligations to the participants of the bounty. Considering the situation on the market and a small volume of sales, we proposed to make the distribution of tokens in parts, or freeze the tokens of the participants of the bounty and unfreeze them after a lapse of time, but pay the participants' reward in full. The team said that would think about this option.
A few days later, the team wrote that they finally decided that in this situation, some of the tokens will be burned and the bounty payment will be 2% from 26,362,027.94 YUM. And they ask us to remove the size of the bounty pool and the related figures from the bounty thread to avoid misunderstandings due to changes.
1)We did not change Bounty thread!
2)We also didn't ban participants who express their opinions either in the main chat or in the Bounty chat.
In the picture above, there are 2 figures:
263620.3 - the amount that the team left for bounty round 2 (similar to round 1)
and 6338137 - the amount that we left in the cap since this was the initial condition that the campaign refused to fulfill.
Unfortunately, this decision of the project team, on which neither the first round team or the second round bounty team can in any way influence, our opinion is extremely negative about this attitude of the development team towards the participants of the bounty and they (the development team) know about it.
Thank you for explaining the situation. It would be nice if you could attach screenshots of the negotiations with the development team. I think that on the basis of these data, everyone who wants to show the true face of the YUMERIUM project will be able to write articles. It will also be possible to send the material to well-known crypto publishers for publication.
This is terrible. I sympathize with those who participated there. Recently, scammers are becoming more cunning. A lot of people don't want to do bounty anymore. Because of such projects, the mood is falling.
Second project left from Amazix after Equi same thing, they also left flipnick, let's see what will happen on that one too.
I hope that this situation will not happen again with the FlipNpik company, otherwise it will be a shame) they also have a bounty that lasts 35 weeks. And this is a very long time. It remains only to cross your fingers and think about the good)
I saw a lot of information about this project, but I did not think that such an incident would turn out with bounty hunters. This is definitely not fair to the people who worked on advertising the project for about six months. I hope that you will resolve this issue and in case the leadership does not go to the meeting, you will be able to punish them in all fairness.
I can say one thing that fraudsters are entering a new level. They even hire professional professionals who draw all this to them. According to this information, I can not understand scam. To be honest, little-known projects are much more successful.
This is very bad of an ICO and its bounty campaign. How can people suffer and work tirelessly for you over several months and you end up reducing their rewards? It is not good at all. Even FTEC did the same thing giving reason that it was as a result of the low token sales. The hunters ended up getting little or even nothing.
Second project left from Amazix after Equi same thing, they also left flipnick, let's see what will happen on that one too.
This deceiving and unethical behavior in managing of bounty campaigns is being orchestrated by the team and bounty manager from the beginning of the campaign by deliberately including in the rules and regulations of the bounty the right to make some changes at their own discretion which majority of bounty hunters are not taking cognizance of, the moment we start reading and understanding bounty rules, the less the accusations of bounty scam in respect to bounty pool
And I wanted to participate in the signature bounty. But it was as if I had a premonition of trouble, and I chose another project. I am very sorry for the hunters who were faithful to this project, and they did this to them ... this is a real deception and fraud.
Ohh no, I've participated in signature for 9 weeks and 76$ in tokens is something I supposed to receive. 20x decrease 2 days prior to payout, is it legit?
We all know that tokens to be dumped after listing,but I will gain nuts shell in any way.
I was in a project called living stars, I participated in 5 months, and in the end I received coins worth 100 dollars. We all know that tokens to be dumped after listing,but I will gain nuts shell in any way.
Guys forgot about last time with ALL.me and Repux?
? We will show them again!
? We will show them again!
I also participated in this bounty , but of course I did not expect such that there will be a Scam , it's certainly first of all a shame to the team and the project as a whole, I will not wish evil , it will return to the project itself
Yes Scam is not uncommon, I think it is not necessary to cry because of one project you need to take the amount that was not so sad that something is not paid
At the beginning, I thought that it was a great project and bounty campaign as well but seem like I was wrong when they started the 2nd round of bounty campaign then 3rd round. LOL. Although they decreased token reward but I think if they still pay for bounty hunter, it'll be fine and Yume will not be a scam project 
. Let's see.
. Let's see. 
For me because of their funds. Once the crowdfunding didn't purely successful I thought they can reduced the rewards. For example, They softcap was 5M$ and the hardcap is 10M$ so if they raised 5.1M$ and they promised was so 500k$. Do you think investors will agree? Almost 10% of the total funds is of bounty hunter? Of course not. better to understand their decision and that is for all the community and also for their investors.
If you're really wanted to make accusation visit this board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
If you're really wanted to make accusation visit this board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
I agree that we need to create a thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 I consider them scammers, because they burned the coins before the distribution to participants of the bounty, not after. All these 6 months, starting from April, there were completely different conditions and the number of tokens. And it suited the team, but after we completed our work and they got what they wanted from us, we are so deceived.
I was thinking about joining this bounty campaign. I thought the project looked pretty good and could get enough investment. The conversation about scam is quite sad, hope it wont be scam...
Jump to: