Author

Topic: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 122. (Read 217687 times)

legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

We appear to have some creative DDoS'er sweeping through. Should have it sorted tonight with new rules on the firewall.

Should improve now actually. New monitor in place and banning ip's already
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?

We appear to have some creative DDoS'er sweeping through. Should have it sorted tonight with new rules on the firewall.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Your pools looks promising and I have pointed my SHA256 miners to you site, but those getting disconnected every few minutes, then they switching to alternate pool and then switching back to your pool for a few minutes and then switched back to alternate pools. And this is running over and over.

Any idea what can cause that?
hero member
Activity: 528
Merit: 500
My multi algo password has "neoscrypt" set to "neoscrypt=0" but somehow I still mine neoscrypt how can this be ?

cheers
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 501
Normalisation strings are going to be quite a bit different for an AMD or NVIDIA GPU, and for CPU's. But they are also going to be quite different for different cards within the same brand depending on how memory intensive or processor intensive an algo is. I wouldn't recommend anyone using the build in normalisation factor table. The algos at the top right of the page might as well be fixed in some order as has been discussed in the hashpower thread. Currrently got one CPU on neoscrypt and the other on x15. One GPU is on neoscrypt and the other on qubit.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.


Must be for AMD....no wonder my profits went down...I think. Smiley
750ti does x11 3.2 mh/s  for one of many that are wrong.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.



I think your normalization is for AMD. Here are some hashrates for Nvidia that can be used as a guideline.

http://cryptomining-blog.com/6369-ccminer-spmod-release-cuda-6-5-vs-cuda-7-5-performance-comparison/
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
btc  13Xb4RvqoeRumYbzNpe4a8jNLb7N3qhFNZ total unpaid 0.00226129 been that way for a few days payout is 0.0001 ?
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.

Payouts are made automatically every 3 hours for all balances above 0.0025 and balances less than 0.0001 are paid on Sunday.

We don't have enough hash yet to mine LTC so might be a while for that payout.

From the main page:

Non-BTC payouts depend on that coin being mined as your BTC balance is traded internally by our system to your currency of choice. If we have not or are not mining that currency your payouts will be delayed until the pool has mined the blocks for you to get paid. If you notice in the pools status that the currency is red, it means there is not sufficient amount of the currency to pay miner(s). It's recommended to use BTC as any other coin could be removed at anytime and payouts will not occur.

i re read about the btc i missed it about the ltc or wouldn't have asked ty .i putting a 256 mh miner i hope online some time next week it's being delivered Monday according to the tracking i got for it, it will take me two days to set it up right and decide what pools to mine etc at first i may solo mine on nice hash then hit here a few days if the ltc hash picks up . i want to save some  ltc really never know what could happen.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
lyra2, quark, qubit, groestl, myr-gr are all faster than x11.
dmd-gr is like groestl, not like myr-gr, and is slower than myr-gr (not the other way around).
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.

Here is where the normalization for the pool is:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/yiimp/web/yaamp/core/functions/yaamp.php#L44

And I have:

        $a = array(
                'PoS'           => 0,
                'sha256'        => 0,
                'scrypt'        => 1,
                'argon2'        => 1,
                'scryptn'       => 0.5,
                'x11'           => 5.5,
                'x13'           => 3.9,
                'x14'           => 3.7,
                'x15'           => 3.5,
                'zr5'           => 3,
                'nist5'         => 16,
                'neoscrypt'     => 0.3,
                'lyra2'         => 1.3,
                'lyra2v2'       => 2.7,
                'quark'         => 5,
                'fresh'         => 5,
                'qubit'         => 5,
                'skein'         => 90,
                'velvet'        => 1.0,
                'yescrypt'      => 1.0,
                'groestl'       => 5,
                'myr-gr'        => 2.5,
                'dmd-gr'        => 2.5,
                'blake'         => 300,
                'blakecoin'     => 5,
                'keccak'        => 160,
        );

If anyone has some suggestions to adjust it, let me know.

legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
btc  13Xb4RvqoeRumYbzNpe4a8jNLb7N3qhFNZ total unpaid 0.00226129 been that way for a few days payout is 0.0001 ?
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.

Payouts are made automatically every 3 hours for all balances above 0.0025 and balances less than 0.0001 are paid on Sunday.

We don't have enough hash yet to mine LTC so might be a while for that payout.

From the main page:

Non-BTC payouts depend on that coin being mined as your BTC balance is traded internally by our system to your currency of choice. If we have not or are not mining that currency your payouts will be delayed until the pool has mined the blocks for you to get paid. If you notice in the pools status that the currency is red, it means there is not sufficient amount of the currency to pay miner(s). It's recommended to use BTC as any other coin could be removed at anytime and payouts will not occur.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
nm on the btc i went back and looked better how does ltc payout work. for btc i need 0.0025 mybad read it wrong .
ltc    LSwqa3s8VrMTGbAPxBKUhKEUChDvi5cU6w total unpaid 0.12797387 I think four to five days ?. not sure how payouts work with ltc.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
Hi, crackfoo.
I mine x11 on zpool using cgminer 3.5.6. It definitely has extranonce.subscribe support, but I never saw it is active on the miner detail section. Am I do something wrong? Should I write something in the options to make it work?
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Smiley
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
Your pool is the best.  Wink
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.
But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one. Smiley

Must have had a brain fart when I wrote that, I meant below the wallet.

Edit: While on the topic the expanded wallet details (pending coins) could use alphabetizing.

Yes like I said up above ..  Smiley ...Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114



Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Smiley
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
Your pool is the best.  Wink
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.
But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one. Smiley

Must have had a brain fart when I wrote that, I meant below the wallet.

Edit: While on the topic the expanded wallet details (pending coins) could use alphabetizing.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Smiley
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
Your pool is the best.  Wink
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.
But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114



Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Smiley
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
Your pool is the best.  Wink
Thx so much.

I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list.
It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?)
miners.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



Hi Crackfoo,
I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if  all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please?
That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's .
If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Smiley
Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Smiley
Your pool is the best.  Wink
Thx so much.
member
Activity: 910
Merit: 10
waiting over a week to get my ~19k DGCS.
startet mining when DGCS was still mining on SHA port but then was grey listed and gone. wth?!
DGCS adress:  DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho  &  DH3zCZ9GDv26t77cEpV9qZ57eiN9ofMkGz

and crackfoo..check orbitcoin on neoscrypt pls. its bugged like hell. blocks are added after or every xx minutes.. sometimes 30min sometimes a hour later and never confirm?!
i have still immature coins after 7 days on DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho.. i have it on 9BGgVW7AJDtW42uRXdhRd2HBqEJbQ2qVea too.

We dropped it cause it wasn't getting mined and was just using resources. I've put it back on and i'll give it a week, but I don't think it'll be profitable to mine enough. It's why we suggest to use BTC as your payout as this can happen anytime with altcoins.

Yeah, something fishy with ORB and some recent changes to my code. It's off the stratum for now until it's sorted.

thanks for adding it back. hopefully some blocks get mining during this time and i get some coins Smiley

ok. good to know and thanks for putting it off from the stratum. maybe it will correct itself Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
waiting over a week to get my ~19k DGCS.
startet mining when DGCS was still mining on SHA port but then was grey listed and gone. wth?!
DGCS adress:  DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho  &  DH3zCZ9GDv26t77cEpV9qZ57eiN9ofMkGz

and crackfoo..check orbitcoin on neoscrypt pls. its bugged like hell. blocks are added after or every xx minutes.. sometimes 30min sometimes a hour later and never confirm?!
i have still immature coins after 7 days on DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho.. i have it on 9BGgVW7AJDtW42uRXdhRd2HBqEJbQ2qVea too.

We dropped it cause it wasn't getting mined and was just using resources. I've put it back on and i'll give it a week, but I don't think it'll be profitable to mine enough. It's why we suggest to use BTC as your payout as this can happen anytime with altcoins.

Yeah, something fishy with ORB and some recent changes to my code. It's off the stratum for now until it's sorted.
Jump to: