waiting over a week to get my ~19k DGCS.
startet mining when DGCS was still mining on SHA port but then was grey listed and gone. wth?!
DGCS adress: DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho & DH3zCZ9GDv26t77cEpV9qZ57eiN9ofMkGz
and crackfoo..check orbitcoin on neoscrypt pls. its bugged like hell. blocks are added after or every xx minutes.. sometimes 30min sometimes a hour later and never confirm?!
i have still immature coins after 7 days on DHKWtVUo8ZhE38fQzhrsLjTrTaC7DuTbho.. i have it on 9BGgVW7AJDtW42uRXdhRd2HBqEJbQ2qVea too.
Topic: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 123. (Read 217687 times)
March 16, 2016, 04:35:50 AM
March 15, 2016, 04:00:21 AM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates.
Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too
low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has
different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show.
I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the
higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs.
Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate.
I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter.
I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up.
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1
Have you tried the sample on the multialgo page? If that doesn't work it's a pool problem.
March 14, 2016, 11:47:12 PM
The yaamp system be default only converts to BTC automatically. LTC is not being mined so crackfoo will need to buy in the LTC manually for payments to occur. DASH is mined but never enough to cover demand, so there is always delays in payments, and payments do not occur if people mine DASH faster then the pool does. To get hold of coins that the pool does not sufficiently mine, it is best to mine another coin and exchange it. Poloniex usually has the cheapest withdrawal fees for most popular coins, but not always.
March 14, 2016, 10:54:25 PM
Hello Support.
I have unpaid account on zpool.ca, more of one week ago.
Please, check it, my LTC address LfA2MSMLj8vpGdrD3CVhaGxXLVtNhLh8cT, 0.01041090 LTC unpaid.
I have unpaid account on zpool.ca, more of one week ago.
Please, check it, my LTC address LfA2MSMLj8vpGdrD3CVhaGxXLVtNhLh8cT, 0.01041090 LTC unpaid.
Be sure the pool has mines enough funds to pay out everyone who wants ltc.
If it's still pending it's waiting for enough funds to compensate you
Thats right. LTC is already behind and the pool is yet to have enough hash to mine a block, which is how we pay miners.
Payouts are made automatically every 3 hours for all balances above 0.0025 and balances less than 0.0001 are paid on Sunday.
There is an initial delay before the first payout as coins you mine need to mature then, exchange and get returned to zpool, please wait at least 24 hours before asking for support.
hashpower.co was paid to me: 0.001 LTC with no problems. there, such system as zpool too.
March 14, 2016, 09:50:04 PM
My current DCR rig is using NVIDIA GT-970 and hashing very well at zpool, using ccminer.
i have setup a rig with AMD R9 390s, any suggestions for best miner and syntax to mine at zpool?
i have setup a rig with AMD R9 390s, any suggestions for best miner and syntax to mine at zpool?
March 14, 2016, 09:28:47 PM
Is there a problem with the latest payout? There's no tx id and the deposit hasn't reached my wallet yet after
over two hours.
over two hours.
Yes, it should correct itself on the next payout. In 10-15 mins or so.
Looks like it has, new timestamp and a tx id. Thanks.
Great. Found a bug from the addition of DCR since they have longer addresses so will work on fixing that so it doesn't happen again.
March 14, 2016, 09:27:46 PM
Is there a problem with the latest payout? There's no tx id and the deposit hasn't reached my wallet yet after
over two hours.
over two hours.
Yes, it should correct itself on the next payout. In 10-15 mins or so.
Looks like it has, new timestamp and a tx id. Thanks.
March 14, 2016, 09:26:44 PM
Is there a problem with the latest payout? There's no tx id and the deposit hasn't reached my wallet yet after
over two hours.
over two hours.
Yes, it should correct itself on the next payout. In 10-15 mins or so.
Just got the email notification "BTC payout problems resolved"
Let me know if there was further problems..
March 14, 2016, 09:15:43 PM
Is there a problem with the latest payout? There's no tx id and the deposit hasn't reached my wallet yet after
over two hours.
over two hours.
Yes, it should correct itself on the next payout. In 10-15 mins or so.
March 14, 2016, 09:11:27 PM
Is there a problem with the latest payout? There's no tx id and the deposit hasn't reached my wallet yet after
over two hours.
over two hours.
March 14, 2016, 08:08:12 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates.
Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too
low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has
different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show.
I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the
higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs.
Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate.
I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter.
I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up.
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1
Have you tried the sample on the multialgo page? If that doesn't work it's a pool problem.
March 14, 2016, 04:58:43 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates.
Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too
low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has
different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show.
I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the
higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs.
Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate.
I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter.
I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up.
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1
March 14, 2016, 04:49:52 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
Did you balance your profitability based on hashrate using the password field?
Also, time to find a block might make the pool put you where you will earn faster.
Pending too. It maybe that the pool had me there to find a block.
Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate.
I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter.
I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up. Wink
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1
ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1
March 14, 2016, 03:00:36 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates.
Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too
low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has
different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show.
I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the
higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
March 14, 2016, 01:32:48 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
Did you balance your profitability based on hashrate using the password field?
Also, time to find a block might make the pool put you where you will earn faster.
March 14, 2016, 01:18:33 PM
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
March 14, 2016, 12:53:59 PM
tbearhere - have you checked the ports? Some of them are not the same as hashpower.
Yes I did.....but rechecking again. Thx
EDIT: bingo..... found it one port was wrong.
I had port 5433 instead of 4533 for lyra2v2.
Thx again
Crackfoo was the pool down? It's working now but was the pool down?
shouldn't have been... I was tweaking some neoscrpyt settings as there seems to be 4-5k miners connecting
March 14, 2016, 12:43:22 PM
tbearhere - have you checked the ports? Some of them are not the same as hashpower.
Yes I did.....but rechecking again. Thx
EDIT: bingo..... found it one port was wrong.
I had port 5433 instead of 4533 for lyra2v2.
Thx again
Crackfoo was the pool down? It's working now but was the pool down?
shouldn't have been... I was tweaking some neoscrpyt settings as there seems to be 4-5k miners connecting
March 14, 2016, 12:29:25 PM
tbearhere - have you checked the ports? Some of them are not the same as hashpower.
Yes I did.....but rechecking again. Thx
EDIT: bingo..... found it one port was wrong.
I had port 5433 instead of 4533 for lyra2v2.
Thx again
Crackfoo was the pool down? It's working now but was the pool down?
Or was it calling for an algo I don't have setup in my bat file?
March 14, 2016, 08:11:38 AM
I thought that they will return as soon as the problem is solved with a fork
Nope no hope that they will return to me?
To me, they are very important
In my situation, it may be every
There are 2 screenshots from nicehash
http://s14.radikal.ru/i187/1603/97/48cf7ee6d50e.jpg
http://s017.radikal.ru/i433/1603/38/dbc40e3825c3.jpg
To prove
Nope no hope that they will return to me?
To me, they are very important
In my situation, it may be every
There are 2 screenshots from nicehash
http://s14.radikal.ru/i187/1603/97/48cf7ee6d50e.jpg
http://s017.radikal.ru/i433/1603/38/dbc40e3825c3.jpg
To prove
Jump to: