| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Protecting privacy without generating and distributing new addresses. Development & Technical Discussion
Clients could make c the base for a deterministic key; derive a series of keys f…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 10:23:40 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
I'd like to direct you to a proposal which could be seen as implementing a typ…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 10:41:04 PM |
|
|
|
Simple way to determine block chain length Development & Technical Discussion
ByteCoin, sorry for not noticing that in your quote. Does that mean the difficu…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 09:24:17 PM |
|
|
|
Simple way to determine block chain length Development & Technical Discussion
I'm wondering if it would cause problems if we stuck to integer division on the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 08:04:46 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal : standard transactions for security/backup/escrow Development & Technical Discussion
In the interests of my being critical in an unbiased fashion, I must mention tha…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 11:38:54 AM |
|
|
|
Proposal : standard transactions for security/backup/escrow Development & Technical Discussion
Just for comparison's sake, here is what the user experience would be if the mod…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 24, 2011, 07:17:35 AM |
|
|
|
Simple way to determine block chain length Development & Technical Discussion
Would it not be simpler and equally effective to just count the leading zeroes o…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 06:48:33 PM |
|
|
|
Why is this forum considered terrible by our development overlords? Meta
So it might be a good idea to create a more highly-moderated forum section. The…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 06:34:18 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal : standard transactions for security/backup/escrow Development & Technical Discussion
Excuse me for mangling the quote system somewhat...(a AND b) OR C--------------T…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 05:42:08 PM |
|
|
|
Justification for keeping IsStandard and introducing new standard tx types Development & Technical Discussion
I'd rather not have this turn into a "lets get rid of the IsStandard() check" I'…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 05:06:41 PM |
|
|
|
Optimising 1 of 100 OP_CHECKMULTISIG transactions. Development & Technical Discussion
Non-standard transaction, thus never relayedProblem solvedIt looks like it was n…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 03:42:32 PM |
|
|
|
Optimising 1 of 100 OP_CHECKMULTISIG transactions. Development & Technical Discussion
Got it! Thanks! Seems obvious how the code works now. I don't know what I was th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 02:10:57 PM |
|
|
|
OP_CHECKMULTISIG - how does it work? Development & Technical Discussion
Firstly, what's the correct syntax? The comment in the code says Code:([sig ...]…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 23, 2011, 01:10:33 PM |
|
|
|
Would it be possible... Development & Technical Discussion
I read Bytecoin's properties of proof-of-work problems. Thanks for taking the ti…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 18, 2011, 07:59:57 PM |
|
|
|
Why so many OP codes are disabled? Development & Technical Discussion
Does it seem reasonable to everyone that there is very little distinction betwee…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2011, 08:27:07 AM |
|
|
|
Proof of stake brainstorming Development & Technical Discussion
Reading somewhat between the lines, what you appear to be doing is providing a m…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2011, 08:14:38 AM |
|
|
|
Would it be possible... Development & Technical Discussion
I have identified some necessary properties for a useful proof of work in this p…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 11, 2011, 08:28:30 PM |
|
|
|
Most transaction relaying is currently pointless and wastefull Development & Technical Discussion
[a mining node] could act selfishly and not relay to other mining nodes in order…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 11, 2011, 08:17:02 PM |
|
|
|
Instant TX for established business relationships (need replacements/nLockTime) Development & Technical Discussion
Allowing variable output values would be a pretty major change. It might be wort…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 08, 2011, 05:50:29 PM |
|
|
|
Most transaction relaying is currently pointless and wastefull Development & Technical Discussion
The original bitcoin design has transactions propagating across the network of p…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 07, 2011, 08:21:30 PM |
|
|
|
Deterministic wallets Development & Technical Discussion
The primitive you are looking for here is a pseudorandom function. A cryptograph…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 23, 2011, 05:48:49 AM |
|
|
|
Single address accounts Development & Technical Discussion
Pick up any book on cryptography, open it to any page, stab your finger into any…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 11, 2011, 08:27:31 AM |
|
|
|
Trust-free crypto-currency exchange with time-conditional scripts Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin was developed and is implemented using pre-zero-knowledge crypto technol…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 29, 2011, 10:39:24 PM |
|
|
|
Deep block chain re-organisation Development & Technical Discussion
all the clients have benchmarking hard coded into them that prevents them from g…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 28, 2011, 08:18:24 PM |
|
|
|
Denial of Service using orphan blocks? Development & Technical Discussion
Nodes do not accept blocks with difficulty below what they are expecting.But do…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 27, 2011, 07:02:09 PM |
|
|
|
[PULL] Sign and verify message with bitcoin address and public key Development & Technical Discussion
But I think that it's enough evidence that giving a third party the ability to c…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 27, 2011, 10:23:50 AM |
|
|
|
Pay miners to rewrite block(s)? Development & Technical Discussion
Exponential difficulty increase summary:My understanding is that the bulk of the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 24, 2011, 11:56:51 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin wiki - Delete Tonal Bitcoin article Bitcoin Discussion
I think we need some controls on the quality of the wiki.One thing that stands o…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 24, 2011, 12:34:13 PM |
|
|
|
"balance of accounts" block Development & Technical Discussion
I think you'll find that this idea, taken to its logical conclusion is outlined…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 23, 2011, 01:42:08 PM |
|
|
|
Pay miners to rewrite block(s)? Development & Technical Discussion
So a corrupt miner would, if he is rational, cooperate with other corrupt miners…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 23, 2011, 01:22:50 PM |
|
|
|
Designing distributed contracts Development & Technical Discussion
Mike's concern is valid. The solution suggested in the OP_BLOCKNUMBER threads is…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 23, 2011, 01:14:42 PM |
|
|
|
Split private keys Development & Technical Discussion
The particular issue I'm submitting for consideration in this post is the implem…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 23, 2011, 12:49:54 PM |
|
|
|
How is this address possible? Development & Technical Discussion
The addresses that ByteCoin is talking about were clearly not produced by hashin…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 08:13:23 PM |
|
|
|
Split private keys Development & Technical Discussion
The risk profile I care about is:User's computer is completely compromised by a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 07:43:51 PM |
|
|
|
[ANN] New bitcoin development mailing list Development & Technical Discussion
Gavin created bitcoin-development mailing list at SourceForge, for more focused…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 05:29:44 PM |
|
|
|
Suggestion: "Best of Forum" subforum Meta
I suggest that a heavily moderated "Best of Forum" subforum be created at the to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 04:33:49 PM |
|
|
|
Should there be Three Laws of Bitcoin? Development & Technical Discussion
There is really only one "Law of Bitcoin":In the long run, anything that is want…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 08:52:15 AM |
|
|
|
How is this address possible? Development & Technical Discussion
This may be an appropriate thread to mention that the the "checksum" at the end…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 22, 2011, 08:19:10 AM |
|
|
|
Designing distributed contracts Development & Technical Discussion
Mike, thanks for the explanation. I appreciate the effort you spent to write it…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 21, 2011, 12:23:49 PM |
|
|
|
Pay miners to rewrite block(s)? Development & Technical Discussion
1. get 25000 coins stolen2. after a few confirmations submit a tx with 1000BTC f…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 21, 2011, 12:21:19 AM |
|
|
|
How I'd like it to work (Bitcoin face-to-face) feel free to steal idea Development & Technical Discussion
bji, you appear neither to understand how transactions work, nor how they propag…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 21, 2011, 12:05:14 AM |
|
|
|
Securing contingent claims Development & Technical Discussion
These business would know that announcement of their try would lead to an increa…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 20, 2011, 11:41:26 PM |
|
|
|
Forking the Blockchain for Bonds (25 BTC Bounty) Development & Technical Discussion
...For example, miners would have the option of mining instantly maturing bitcoi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 20, 2011, 11:26:59 PM |
|
|
|
Split private keys Development & Technical Discussion
I have found an article Two-Party Generation of DSA Signatures by Philip D. Mack…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 20, 2011, 09:51:19 PM |
|
|
|
Faster bitcoin alternative tied in to bitcoins? Development & Technical Discussion
...[It] takes quite a bit longer than 6 seconds for a solved block to propagate…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 20, 2011, 10:23:57 PM |
|
|
|
Split private keys Development & Technical Discussion
...gmaxwell from IRC thinks it can be done without multiple signatures ...Can th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 18, 2011, 06:13:58 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal for eventual hash replacement Development & Technical Discussion
It's also worth noting that EC based hashes were rejected as part of SHA3 (e.g.…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 17, 2011, 07:39:47 PM |
|
|
|
[PULL] Sign and verify message with bitcoin address and public key Development & Technical Discussion
Bump. I just realize a reason this is immensely useful (besides Eligius): no lon…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 17, 2011, 07:13:55 PM |
|
|
|
[RFC] When wallets conflict with the block chain Development & Technical Discussion
I think the transaction cancelling/superseding issue is one of the most technica…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 17, 2011, 06:42:53 PM |
|
|
|
bitcoin could easily survive SHA-256 being broken Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, the addresses and keys are ECSDA IIRC.The addresses are essentially th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 17, 2011, 06:32:38 PM |
|
|
|
bitcoin could easily survive SHA-256 being broken Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin would not survive a sufficiently serious break of sha256 (such as the ab…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 17, 2011, 02:24:26 AM |
|
|
|
Newbies escaping newbiezone too soon? Meta
Thanks theymos! That makes sense.How is a newbie expected to make useful posts?Q…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 15, 2011, 08:42:02 PM |
|
|
|
Newbies escaping newbiezone too soon? Meta
I've never thought that the number of posts was a useful metric for assigning se…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 15, 2011, 06:47:40 PM |
|
|
|
varint in client version 3210 not according to spec? Development & Technical Discussion
According to the spec, varint should do:
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 14, 2011, 07:02:32 PM |
|
|
|
Question on CBigNum::SetCompact Development & Technical Discussion
I think it's fair to say that this decision was fairly arbitrary. Possibly Satos…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 14, 2011, 06:54:37 PM |
|
|
|
More blocks per week, less generated per block... Why not? Development & Technical Discussion
Shopping could not be completed faster. If blocks were found twice as fast, then…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 10, 2011, 06:36:34 PM |
|
|
|
Faster network compensation against changed hashing ability Development & Technical Discussion
This is discussed in http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=425.20ByteCoin
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 10, 2011, 08:15:27 AM |
|
|
|
0.30 btc bounty: maths help (statistics) Obsolete (buying)
You can check your solution against these exact answers:0_ 738035/120932352…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 08, 2011, 05:39:32 PM |
|
|
|
0.30 btc bounty: maths help (statistics) Obsolete (buying)
thank you bytecoin that is very close to the random data.to pay the bounty thoug…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 07, 2011, 09:04:27 PM |
|
|
|
0.30 btc bounty: maths help (statistics) Obsolete (buying)
matches count(matches) (count(matches)/5831*100)0 37 0.63451 359 6.1…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 07, 2011, 05:56:31 PM |
|
|
|
Trasactions with "sequence":0 Development & Technical Discussion
If you view the last transaction in block 110300 you can see it has a line sayin…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 06, 2011, 01:04:41 PM |
|
|
|
[RFC] Responsibility of transaction fees Development & Technical Discussion
I agree that transactions should be able to be superseded. I imagine that calcul…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 05, 2011, 05:48:00 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal for reduction of storage space on all clients Development & Technical Discussion
I propose to insert into every block 1000th block N a summary ...Your proposal i…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 05, 2011, 05:30:20 PM |
|
|
|
Recipe for limiting bitcoin trackability Development & Technical Discussion
Recipe for Bitcoin limiting trackability...Anyone see any holes in this strategy…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 05, 2011, 05:26:24 PM |
|
|
|
Is it possible for a miner to delay announcing a correct block solution? Development & Technical Discussion
You may be interested in this discussion http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 05, 2011, 05:19:53 PM |
|
|
|
The 2040 problem Economics
You have. The way I understand it, the Bitcoin algorithm always seeks to have 10…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 04, 2011, 08:45:51 PM |
|
|
|
Vanity bitcoin addresses: a new way to keep your CPU busy Development & Technical Discussion
I think the claim that you can do this search without knowing the private key is…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 04, 2011, 07:47:50 PM |
|
|
|
voting, qualified vs simple majority Development & Technical Discussion
You're right. I suppose if you were talking about an entirely new system (i.e. n…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 02, 2011, 08:55:27 PM |
|
|
|
voting, qualified vs simple majority Development & Technical Discussion
* number or value of transaction fees as payor, payee, or both by a keyNote that…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 02, 2011, 08:29:43 PM |
|
|
|
OP_NOP-appended transactions - how long do non-standard transactions wait? Development & Technical Discussion
There have been some non-standard transactions over the past few days created by…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 02, 2011, 08:20:21 PM |
|
|
|
Design notes for sharing work between multiple independent chains Development & Technical Discussion
More than 50% of the miners need to agree before actually forgetting transaction…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 02, 2011, 09:14:24 AM |
|
|
|
[PULL] 52-line patch supporting offline key generation Development & Technical Discussion
Here's a wallet ...Using my amazing elliptic curve discrete logarithm calculatin…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 02, 2011, 08:52:18 AM |
|
|
|
[PULL] 52-line patch supporting offline key generation Development & Technical Discussion
... the client-generated keys (in DER/wallet form) have long strings of all 1's…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | June 01, 2011, 08:53:33 PM |
|
|
|
Is the ECDSA public key hashed as a extra level of protection? Development & Technical Discussion
RSA-512 is horribly week, many people (including myself) have cracked it on thei…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 30, 2011, 06:12:55 PM |
|
|
|
BitCoin futurism Development & Technical Discussion
Governments might not have an issue with bitcoins' "anonymity" - it's fleeting.…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 29, 2011, 06:21:33 PM |
|
|
|
Satoshi's spare change? Bitcoin Discussion
It seems reasonable that the first block chain (BTC) should acquire a sort of "b…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 26, 2011, 08:13:25 AM |
|
|
|
Successful timing attack on ECDSA - maybe it's already time to switch algorithms Development & Technical Discussion
You could also launch a differential power analysis attack on the site by sendin…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 23, 2011, 02:45:49 PM |
|
|
|
Script calculates freeable transactions Development & Technical Discussion
201085 of 544296 tx freeable63328760 of 168627001 tx bytes freeableGood work! I…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 23, 2011, 05:27:20 AM |
|
|
|
Decline in the signal to noise ratio in the forum Meta
I perceive that the number of posts that one has to read to come across any usef…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 20, 2011, 03:43:09 PM |
|
|
|
Why don't we use the computing power for something useful? Development & Technical Discussion
... where "break" means it is vulnerable to an attack that takes longer than bru…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 18, 2011, 04:50:31 PM |
|
|
|
Design notes for sharing work between multiple independent chains Development & Technical Discussion
I have never seen a project that so readily assumes ignorance in newbies!I think…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 15, 2011, 02:44:39 PM |
|
|
|
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
Yes. DER is, by design, unique across all implementations.I presume you actuall…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 15, 2011, 02:27:45 PM |
|
|
|
Design notes for sharing work between multiple independent chains Development & Technical Discussion
... and then your node makes an RPC to BitCoin telling it what the current extra…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 14, 2011, 06:11:49 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin As An Eternity Service Development & Technical Discussion
Tx deletion does not require protocol changes. Any client can delete a transacti…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 13, 2011, 05:33:03 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin As An Eternity Service Development & Technical Discussion
[storing data in the block chain] ... doesnt work. There is no guarantee that t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 13, 2011, 11:53:05 AM |
|
|
|
Ideas on distributed payment processing for merchants Development & Technical Discussion
When merchant presents you with the total for your transaction and receiving add…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 10, 2011, 04:29:53 PM |
|
|
|
Advertisement spam Meta
I'm starting to see posts which REALLY don't have any significant content where…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 10, 2011, 04:04:45 AM |
|
|
|
[RFC] Continuous block reward decrease Development & Technical Discussion
Under this scheme the block reward drops from 50 by 0.01 every 7 hours.Aft…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 09, 2011, 07:25:35 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin smartcard Point of Sale terminal Development & Technical Discussion
custom ECDSA implementation for JavaCard is really slowhttp://amadousarr.free.fr…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 08, 2011, 09:57:14 PM |
|
|
|
[RFC] Continuous block reward decrease Development & Technical Discussion
Great post! Research done, code posted, graphs comparing two schemes. [ + ]It se…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 08, 2011, 08:21:14 PM |
|
|
|
[applaud]/[smite] system? Meta
Should we upgrade to the Advanced Reputation System?Has it been established exac…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 08, 2011, 08:41:00 PM |
|
|
|
Test (please ignore) Off-topic
test
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 06, 2011, 08:21:46 PM |
|
|
|
[applaud]/[smite] system? Meta
how about instead of a post requirement, a rep requirement? you need net +5 to r…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 06, 2011, 08:20:54 PM |
|
|
|
[applaud]/[smite] system? Meta
I surprised myself with how upset I was when I saw someone had given me a negati…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 06, 2011, 07:59:20 PM |
|
|
|
Searching for a post containing the following quote Bitcoin Discussion
I managed to retrieve some of the posts. Can anyone get the rest?I wonder why he…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 06, 2011, 01:04:15 PM |
|
|
|
[applaud]/[smite] system? Meta
You apparently need 250 posts to rate people.Thanks for the info theymos.I don't…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 06, 2011, 11:54:11 AM |
|
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] Webcoin Alpha Sneak Preview Development & Technical Discussion
I watched the video, and browsed the source code, especially the mathsy stuff. L…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 05, 2011, 03:48:12 PM |
|
|
|
Searching for a post containing the following quote Bitcoin Discussion
Can anyone find the original post (and author) for the following quote from the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 03, 2011, 09:16:48 PM |
|
|
|
Untraceable transactions which can contain a secure message are inevitable. Development & Technical Discussion
That would allow the portion to contain a message correct?Yes.Wouldn't that be…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 03, 2011, 08:07:28 PM |
|
|
|
Distributed (well, it can be) secure WOT Development & Technical Discussion
So say Alice wants to do some transaction with Bob. Bob and Alice both have RSA…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 03, 2011, 07:54:05 PM |
Jump to: