| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
New Paper: Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network Development & Technical Discussion
A new paper called "Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network" by Biryuk…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 30, 2014, 08:36:29 AM |
|
|
|
I can't log in to Bytecoin and the "reset password" email never gets to me Beginners & Help |
n/a | ByteCoin | May 09, 2014, 08:40:32 PM |
|
|
|
On The Longest Chain Rule and Programmed Self-Destruction of Crypto Currencies Development & Technical Discussion
I know Nicolas Courtois and had I not seen the paper linked from his web page I…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | May 09, 2014, 08:04:51 PM |
|
|
|
Discouraging "Selfish" mining Development & Technical Discussion
I really like your proposal, ByteCoin. I think it captures the intuitive notion…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2013, 06:52:27 PM |
|
|
|
Discouraging "Selfish" mining Development & Technical Discussion
I was very pleased to read a recent paper by Eyal and Sirer which put on a rigor…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2013, 10:33:49 AM |
|
|
|
Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
This is the first thing written about Bitcoin that's been worth reading in quite…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | April 12, 2013, 06:33:30 PM |
|
|
|
[PROPOSAL] Untrackable addresses Development & Technical Discussion
That's very neat, thanks. I suggest we write this up on the wiki somewhere so it…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 20, 2012, 04:48:49 PM |
|
|
|
New Attack Vector Development & Technical Discussion
For every ECDSA signature (r,s), the signature (r, -s (mod N)) is a valid signat…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 04, 2012, 09:40:39 PM |
|
|
|
Transaction script with block height as condition Development & Technical Discussion
If you held a pre-signed transaction that sends the funds back to you with a loc…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 04, 2012, 09:29:55 PM |
|
|
|
Transaction metadata (do we need an OP_DROP transaction type?) Development & Technical Discussion
Unless you were talking about the data you need to initialize another node that…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 13, 2012, 04:35:42 PM |
|
|
|
Crypto question: Breaking ECDSA for all key-pairs simultaneously? Development & Technical Discussion
Is there a method to break an ECC curve for all key-pairs (Q,d) such that (Q=d*G…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 13, 2012, 04:26:58 PM |
|
|
|
Transaction metadata (do we need an OP_DROP transaction type?) Development & Technical Discussion
Let's say you have a message pubkey M. It was calculated from issuer public key…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 11, 2012, 07:24:24 PM |
|
|
|
Transaction metadata (do we need an OP_DROP transaction type?) Development & Technical Discussion
I think there are definitely use-cases for associating some immutable meta-data…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 10, 2012, 07:23:45 PM |
|
|
|
BIP 34 : block height in the coinbase Development & Technical Discussion
Suggested fix: Include the block number in the coinbase. Nice to see my suggesti…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 13, 2012, 06:49:51 PM |
|
|
|
Distributed bond markets and pay-to-policy outputs Development & Technical Discussion
Sahai-Waters CP-ABE is a recent advance based on pairing-based encryption. Nice…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 09, 2012, 05:49:01 PM |
|
|
|
[BOUNTY] Merchant Return/"refuse" Unwanted Incoming TX from Green Addresses Development & Technical Discussion
This sounds like the exact problem I was hoping to solve with Armory's signatur…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 31, 2012, 08:32:52 PM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
https://blockexplorer.com/address/1QLbz7JHiBTspS962RLKV8GndWFwi5j6QrByteCoin
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 31, 2012, 07:48:34 PM |
|
|
|
Adding "Send to Firstbits address" support for Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Since Firstbits addresses are deterministic, I think that they should be fully s…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 31, 2012, 07:43:02 PM |
|
|
|
[BOUNTY] Merchant Return/"refuse" Unwanted Incoming TX from Green Addresses Development & Technical Discussion
The right thing, by the way, is for the casino to request a return address (addr…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 31, 2012, 07:22:35 PM |
|
|
|
Can you attach a fee payment to a transaction you haven't signed? Development & Technical Discussion
1) Casino accepts BTC for customer deposit to customer's unique address. 2) Cust…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 31, 2012, 06:44:05 PM |
|
|
|
Forgetting the forgetful Development & Technical Discussion
Due to the absence of effective fungibility for bitcoins, all bitcoins are trace…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 26, 2012, 04:30:33 PM |
|
|
|
Miners that refuse to include transactions are becoming a problem Development & Technical Discussion
I am a little concerned that they're not actually verifying transactions like th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 19, 2012, 04:38:46 PM |
|
|
|
Rapidly adjusted micropayments and multisig/P2SH Development & Technical Discussion
The party who broadcast the TX should just hold onto it themselves and broadcast…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 04, 2012, 03:22:14 PM |
|
|
|
Backups in a Multi-sig world Development & Technical Discussion
There has always been this nagging discomfort with me with regards to P2SH... a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | March 02, 2012, 09:31:58 PM |
|
|
|
Meeting Tuesday 21:00 UTC #bitcoin-dev Freenode IRC Development & Technical Discussion
Duplicate coinbase issue (and requiring block height in the coinbase as a soluti…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | February 14, 2012, 04:08:34 AM |
|
|
|
The Truth behind BIP 16 and 17 (important read) Bitcoin Discussion
It is already cryptographically possible to have two or more devices each have a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | February 03, 2012, 07:45:20 PM |
|
|
|
0 confirmation - signed by miner? Development & Technical Discussion
The question that stays in the air is whether the risk of suffering a double-spe…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | February 03, 2012, 08:21:48 AM |
|
|
|
0 confirmation - signed by miner? Development & Technical Discussion
Is it a promise to reject any block contains a different transaction with the sa…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | February 01, 2012, 07:11:43 AM |
|
|
|
BIP 17 Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | ByteCoin | January 26, 2012, 11:29:40 PM |
|
|
|
BIP 17 Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | ByteCoin | January 26, 2012, 07:29:58 PM |
|
|
|
bytecoin's bitcoin pics for t-shirts Bitcoin Discussion
So I messaged bytecoin who created the awesome Bitcoin graphics, but he seems to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | January 14, 2012, 07:15:02 PM |
|
|
|
Possibly stupid question on tx pruning. Development & Technical Discussion
But if I am accepting a pruned chain from another node, both versions of the tx…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | January 14, 2012, 03:54:00 PM |
|
|
|
PULL request #748 : Pay-to-script-hash (OP_EVAL replacement) Development & Technical Discussion
Please, explain to us the big picture if you want the modification to happen.At…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | January 14, 2012, 03:30:08 PM |
|
|
|
PULL request #748 : Pay-to-script-hash (OP_EVAL replacement) Development & Technical Discussion
If Satoshi thought that it was better to save a few bytes than to use a standard…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | January 11, 2012, 05:38:11 PM |
|
|
|
All Hero Members are allowed to arbitrate disputes and gather private informatio Meta
Whether you're a hero member has nothing to do with it. I place very little stoc…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 30, 2011, 04:34:45 AM |
|
|
|
No "wallet protection services" without (A and B) or C transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Quote ECDSA signature of some nonce with some fixed k value. This is probably a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 25, 2011, 03:58:56 AM |
|
|
|
The way how to double protection bitcoin network against 51% attack Development & Technical Discussion
If the network was split 10 blocks ago then I should see that those 10 blocks to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 25, 2011, 03:38:56 AM |
|
|
|
Proposal: Pre-emptive measures against 51% attacks Development & Technical Discussion
Very simply - if I as a client have block X, which I know has been seen by MtGox…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 25, 2011, 03:08:36 AM |
|
|
|
No "wallet protection services" without (A and B) or C transactions Development & Technical Discussion
The proposed etotheipi solution makes it quite feasible securely to operate a bi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 22, 2011, 09:00:02 PM |
|
|
|
Single key wallets with privacy Development & Technical Discussion
I came up with a scheme which looks like it's functionally equivalent in the thr…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 21, 2011, 09:04:43 AM |
|
|
|
No "wallet protection services" without (A and B) or C transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Can we come up with a scheme that uses 2-of-3 that solves the problem?The two ad…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 14, 2011, 09:45:24 PM |
|
|
|
Poker and the shared pot at the table in a decentralised network Development & Technical Discussion
Do you think that this can become something bigger as a "totally decentralized b…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 12, 2011, 10:10:38 PM |
|
|
|
No "wallet protection services" without (A and B) or C transactions Development & Technical Discussion
As mentioned in BIP0011, implementing multisignature transactions is expected to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 12, 2011, 09:59:32 PM |
|
|
|
get address from private key Development & Technical Discussion
Code: printf("X: "); /* print both r and s for debug reasons */ for(i=0; i
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 09, 2011, 11:58:54 PM |
|
|
|
Transaction that expires if not included in next block Development & Technical Discussion
No and yes respectively.A number of mechanisms have been proposed to implement t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 08, 2011, 10:16:28 PM |
|
|
|
Elliptic curve math question Development & Technical Discussion
The recently explained security flaw resulting from adding public key points to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 08, 2011, 09:51:20 PM |
|
|
|
Using bitcoin for trusted timestamping? Development & Technical Discussion
0-value outputs can be spent (uselessly)You have a habit of identifying these in…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 04, 2011, 09:28:58 PM |
|
|
|
CubeHash as a SHA alternative Development & Technical Discussion
If you use the different hash functions separately and then XOR the results, you…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 03, 2011, 01:45:35 PM |
|
|
|
(a and b) OR c transactions Development & Technical Discussion
If you make them a 2-of-3-to-redeem, is that the same as an (a and b) OR c tran…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 01, 2011, 11:57:06 PM |
|
|
|
Elliptic curve math question Development & Technical Discussion
X = 79BE667E F9DCBBAC 55A06295 CE870B07 029BFCDB 2DCE28D9 59F2815B 16F81798Y = 4…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | December 02, 2011, 01:35:27 AM |
|
|
|
JSON-RPC API change: Explicit handling of transaction fees Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think there should be any way for users to override required fees until…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 30, 2011, 10:29:20 PM |
|
|
|
A proposal for a scalable blockchain. Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting idea!somebody should hack together a client or miner that uses a led…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 30, 2011, 10:13:42 PM |
|
|
|
Coinbaser branch's new JSON-RPC method Development & Technical Discussion
I don't know nuthin about merged mining-- anybody have objections to Luke-Jr's p…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 30, 2011, 09:49:37 PM |
|
|
|
A proposal for a scalable blockchain. Development & Technical Discussion
Building Test Ledger...10.5081% of the original sizeSplendid! Would you be so ki…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 30, 2011, 09:30:15 PM |
|
|
|
Elliptic curve math question Development & Technical Discussion
Or with point addition (slightly different, but the security is the same):The fi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 29, 2011, 01:37:46 PM |
|
|
|
Elliptic curve math question Development & Technical Discussion
My hope is that both secrets S1 and S2 would be needed to derive the actual priv…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 28, 2011, 08:46:54 PM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
In this message it includes the following:Its own private key, encrypted by the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2011, 12:48:17 PM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
As far as I can tell, the only thing the transaction script would have to do is…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2011, 10:14:07 AM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
Now I apparently didn't read the second paragraph very well, but if this means t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2011, 10:35:45 AM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
So, as soon as there's a disconnection, all users need to generate the new commo…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2011, 07:56:43 AM |
|
|
|
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator [v0.17] Development & Technical Discussion
Solution: 1) Each party publishes their pattern list.2) Each party generates a k…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2011, 07:39:13 AM |
|
|
|
BIP - Capitilizing on Bitcoin's Block Space. Development & Technical Discussion
You can put data into the block chain using standard transactions in ways that a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 03, 2011, 09:16:38 PM |
|
|
|
BIPs 11, 12 and 13: multisig txns, OP_EVAL, and OP_EVAL addresses Development & Technical Discussion
I thought I'd transplant Gavin's post to here, rather than derail the original t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 02, 2011, 06:22:24 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Transaction Volume Bitcoin Discussion
What differentiates bitcoins sent from one address to another vs. bitcoins "spen…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 02, 2011, 06:47:39 PM |
|
|
|
Tons of non-standard scripts! Development & Technical Discussion
I am crashing when I try to HASH160 an OP_0 byte, but I can't figure out what m…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 02, 2011, 02:22:09 PM |
|
|
|
Witholding transactions Development & Technical Discussion
If a client transmits a new transaction to a bunch of miners, isn't it in the in…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 12, 2011, 09:15:41 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal: Bitcoin Preauths & IOUs Development & Technical Discussion
Interestingly, in order to use LockTime, you have to give at least one of your T…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 09, 2011, 07:31:43 PM |
|
|
|
OP_EVAL proposal Development & Technical Discussion
Major structural design changes like OP_EVAL invalidate all those assurances and…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 06, 2011, 08:00:00 PM |
|
|
|
OP_EVAL proposal Development & Technical Discussion
If such comprehensive changes are being considered then I suggest that the defau…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 04, 2011, 06:53:42 PM |
|
|
|
Typo-tolerant base58 for Bitcoin clients Development & Technical Discussion
It always uses "1", because "l" looks like "1", not "L". I'm assuming the error…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 05, 2011, 11:41:35 AM |
|
|
|
Typo-tolerant base58 for Bitcoin clients Development & Technical Discussion
If the correction function only results in the replacement of an invalid charact…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 05, 2011, 11:26:25 AM |
|
|
|
Typo-tolerant base58 for Bitcoin clients Development & Technical Discussion
It does not make guesses that could be wrong. There is a checksum to prevent tha…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 05, 2011, 11:04:48 AM |
|
|
|
OP_EVAL proposal Development & Technical Discussion
I must credit sipa as first raising this issue as far as I know.If we did the ob…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 03, 2011, 09:08:11 PM |
|
|
|
OP_EVAL proposal Development & Technical Discussion
I don't see the difference between this and my proposal, except for ... the use…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 01, 2011, 08:31:46 PM |
|
|
|
OP_EVAL proposal Development & Technical Discussion
I must credit jimrandomh for this quote which put me on the right track.Now supp…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 01, 2011, 07:49:19 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal : standard transactions for security/backup/escrow Development & Technical Discussion
Note I'm talking only about locktime, NOT the ability to have replaceable TX whi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 01, 2011, 05:17:16 PM |
|
|
|
IDEA: Anonymous, revocable transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I missed this first time round. I will edit this comment on Sunday to address th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 30, 2011, 12:06:53 PM |
|
|
|
Constructing transactions without access to the block-chain Development & Technical Discussion
At the moment, everyone using Bitcoin runs a full-weight network connected clien…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 29, 2011, 06:44:16 PM |
|
|
|
[PULL] Sign and verify message with bitcoin address and public key Development & Technical Discussion
Page 8 of this paper by Bernstein et al. refers to techniques to make signatures…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 29, 2011, 08:16:07 AM |
|
|
|
DoS countermeasures may facilitate network fragmentation attacks Development & Technical Discussion
You get a very similar vulnerability through timejacking (aka "forcing clock dri…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 11:09:16 PM |
|
|
|
DoS countermeasures may facilitate network fragmentation attacks Development & Technical Discussion
An attacker concocts two different sequences of blocks and/or transactions and/o…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 10:18:32 PM |
|
|
|
Mainstream sticking your wallet.dat in the Cloud Development & Technical Discussion
Of course, it would be incredibly insecure unless your password was as long as a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 08:40:41 PM |
|
|
|
[PULL] Sign and verify message with bitcoin address and public key Development & Technical Discussion
it's probably sensible to tolerate variation as much as possible.In most practi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 07:38:25 PM |
|
|
|
VOTE: The name for Bitcoin Improvement Proposals Development & Technical Discussion
With reference to this discussionByteCoin
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 02:13:29 PM |
|
|
|
[PULL] Sign and verify message with bitcoin address and public key Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for testing. The second issue you found is a good catch!It generates a di…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 06:41:42 PM |
|
|
|
Enhancements to Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
I edited the poll to add BRFI. I presumed the two votes which were formerly allo…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 20, 2011, 03:36:39 PM |
|
|
|
Proposal : standard transactions for security/backup/escrow Development & Technical Discussion
This option would allow trust-less exchange between chains, right?No. Exchanges…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 19, 2011, 06:14:01 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Transaction Volume Bitcoin Discussion
a theoretical series of transactions which move 100% of the existing bitcoin to…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 19, 2011, 06:27:40 PM |
|
|
|
Trust-free crypto-currency exchange with time-conditional scripts Development & Technical Discussion
Now it seems you are basically re-implementing nlocktime without nlocktime in a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 12, 2011, 05:35:38 PM |
|
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] New alternate cryptocurrency - Geist Geld Announcements (Altcoins)
RE: hidden recipient address:... I'll update the wiki [with a simpler version of…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 12, 2011, 06:20:33 PM |
|
|
|
Possible way to make a very profitable 50 plus ish attack for pools? Development & Technical Discussion
No, obviously you need to do the same or more total hashes as the real chain (it…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 12, 2011, 05:48:48 PM |
|
|
|
Possible way to make a very profitable 50 plus ish attack for pools? Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for the clear explanation ArtForz!Now here's the weird part, we retarget…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 12, 2011, 05:06:23 PM |
|
|
|
Trust-free crypto-currency exchange with time-conditional scripts Development & Technical Discussion
If you're smarter than me and see how to do it please let me know!I believe I ha…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 01, 2011, 11:52:22 PM |
|
|
|
Trust-free crypto-currency exchange with time-conditional scripts Development & Technical Discussion
Once we get this, I can design all sorts of other untrusted trade schemes, but t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 01, 2011, 07:56:44 AM |
|
|
|
Trust-free crypto-currency exchange with time-conditional scripts Development & Technical Discussion
Er nothing in bitcoin requires ZK. ... It's also a bit weird calling things li…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 31, 2011, 08:34:36 PM |
|
|
|
Some nLockTime and transaction hash calculation questions Development & Technical Discussion
The idea of using nLockTime is to have a transaction which can be replaced but w…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 31, 2011, 05:58:32 PM |
|
|
|
Protecting privacy without generating and distributing new addresses. Development & Technical Discussion
You correctly identify that my proposal needs a way to revoke keys in the event…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 31, 2011, 03:41:42 PM |
|
|
|
Protecting privacy without generating and distributing new addresses. Development & Technical Discussion
Bytecoin, this is great stuff. Thanks! I'm glad you've taken the time to under…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 30, 2011, 07:34:13 PM |
|
|
|
Security of [ (A and B) or C ] transaction types Development & Technical Discussion
It was precisely this issue that prompted me to devise this solution.ByteCoin
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 25, 2011, 02:59:01 PM |
|
|
|
Protecting privacy without generating and distributing new addresses. Development & Technical Discussion
Is that at all useful/realistic? The whole point of a public key is that everyo…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 25, 2011, 09:00:49 AM |
Jump to: