It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Transactions with identical hashes Development & Technical Discussion
Yeah, I think that is right. I was thinking more if you sent your generates to g…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 06:18:28 PM | ||
Bitcoin Block Explorer Bitcoin Discussion
It's a very handy tool. It would be good (for me at least) if there was a field…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 01:33:59 PM | ||
Transactions with identical hashes Development & Technical Discussion
The network can't do it for you.Yes it can. The network should demand that valid…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 01:01:14 PM | ||
Transactions with identical hashes Development & Technical Discussion
This is not a fault in Bitcoin, but in someone's custom miner. (Maybe the networ…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 12:45:24 PM | ||
Transactions with identical hashes Development & Technical Discussion
so ... how did something like that even happen ?The implementation does not take…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 12:24:19 PM | ||
Transactions with identical hashes Development & Technical Discussion
Oh no! That's really bad!Suggested fix: Include the block number in the coinbase…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 17, 2010, 12:05:42 PM | ||
The State vs. Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
I just checked, and the total number of addresses is actually much lower. It's…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 10:05:25 PM | ||
Need OP_BLOCKNUMBER to allow "time" limited transactions Development & Technical Discussion
That would be useful, but it's probably best to keep scripts stateless. Since di…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 09:47:30 PM | ||
THE Ultimate Killer App for Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
Great. So what would you like to buy using Bitcoins and what do you have that yo…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 08:24:07 PM | ||
Need OP_BLOCKNUMBER to allow "time" limited transactions Development & Technical Discussion
At the moment, if you make a payment to someone but they've wiped their wallet t…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 08:17:03 PM | ||
Are GPU's actually a good thing? Bitcoin Discussion
GPU mining has had an interesting effect on Bitcoin even in the short time I hav…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 07:56:35 PM | ||
People complaining about how hard it is to generate Bitcoin Discussion
The issue is how to jump-start the economy and get the basic economic unit flowi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 07:31:05 PM | ||
Rethinking Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
In your initial post RHorning you raised a number of interesting issues and I di…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 14, 2010, 07:09:38 PM | ||
People complaining about how hard it is to generate Bitcoin Discussion
QuoteI agree that it would be more fair if every person started with an equal nu…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 13, 2010, 07:01:33 PM | ||
Some testing that I did on the testnetwork, my findings. Development & Technical Discussion
In support of the priority feature, SelectCoins only uses your own 0 conf transa…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 13, 2010, 06:55:11 PM | ||
Rethinking Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin rewards user's expendature of CPU time to support the network but does n…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 12, 2010, 09:14:34 PM | ||
What if someone encodes kiddie porn into the chain? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think so much information can be encoded into just ONE address, is there…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 12, 2010, 09:20:33 PM | ||
What if someone encodes kiddie porn into the chain? Development & Technical Discussion
I saw a post saying that for 50BTC you could encode something like 300K into the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 12, 2010, 09:03:15 PM | ||
Feature Request: Printed Wallet Backups ("Bearer Bonds") Development & Technical Discussion
Some people like to hold a physical item in their hand.They perceive this as mor…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 12, 2010, 02:10:11 AM | ||
Feature Request: Printed Wallet Backups ("Bearer Bonds") Development & Technical Discussion
Could you print a certificate that represents a certain number of bitcoins that…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 11, 2010, 09:47:31 PM | ||
Creating a Bitcoin Buying / Selling Service Bitcoin Discussion
Is it worth attempting: I've been very tempted!You're an existing bitcoin exper…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 11, 2010, 01:14:34 PM | ||
Feature Request: Printed Wallet Backups ("Bearer Bonds") Development & Technical Discussion
You could do this by printing out your private keys. gavinandresen may have som…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 08:49:41 PM | ||
Some testing that I did on the testnetwork, my findings. Development & Technical Discussion
The priority calculation you suggest would be a considerable improvement over th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 07:30:32 PM | ||
Bitcoin is not as advertised Bitcoin Discussion
BBE is not "released" yet, so I certainly don't guarantee that this will be accu…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 07:03:02 PM | ||
"wallet" handling code should be a separate process. Development & Technical Discussion
All the other functionality needed (like generating public/private keys, generat…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 04:14:26 PM | ||
Idea for the future (Is this possible?) Economics
Otherwise, if this takes off, it seems like it will just be a big waste of energ…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 04:00:41 PM | ||
"wallet" handling code should be a separate process. Development & Technical Discussion
If you're a multinational using Bitcoin for substantial payment and capital purp…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 03:42:37 PM | ||
"wallet" handling code should be a separate process. Development & Technical Discussion
Agreed. However, splitting the functionality across processes that communicate u…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 03:39:01 PM | ||
"wallet" handling code should be a separate process. Development & Technical Discussion
I've reviewed Bitcoin's networking code looking specifically for possible buffer…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 08, 2010, 01:26:12 PM | ||
"wallet" handling code should be a separate process. Development & Technical Discussion
Buffer overflow attacks against the current client could allow an unauthenticate…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2010, 11:50:38 PM | ||
Bitcoin ocd Bitcoin Discussion
What happens if you're also uncomfortable having a balance that is doesn't have…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2010, 11:10:37 PM | ||
RFC: Remove mining from bitcoin? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, there seems to be agreement that eventually users will have a "lightweight"…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2010, 11:04:40 PM | ||
Some testing that I did on the testnetwork, my findings. Development & Technical Discussion
Actually... prioritizing free transactions based on both amount and their "age"…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2010, 09:31:22 PM | ||
RFC: Remove mining from bitcoin? Development & Technical Discussion
I agree that the Bitcoin coin generation should be a separate process that has a…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 07, 2010, 08:19:50 PM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
So, if the block size is over 40KB, ALL transactions in that block would require…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 05, 2010, 10:34:03 AM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
Look at the code... "If the block size is under 40KB, transactions over 25KB are…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 05, 2010, 07:58:34 AM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
The generators are the ones who have to store the block chain and do the proof-o…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 05, 2010, 03:57:58 AM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
Yes; transaction fees are ignored by AcceptBlock. This is by design, as it allow…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 11:10:45 PM | ||
Bitcoin is not as advertised Bitcoin Discussion
The easiest way is to simply watch for an excessively long block interval. Alt…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 10:55:37 PM | ||
Bitcoin is not as advertised Bitcoin Discussion
The total proof-of-work of the blockchain is considered by the clients when deci…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 10:47:21 PM | ||
Bitcoin is not as advertised Bitcoin Discussion
If a bitcoin was sent 2 months ago and someone changes the block chain did a bit…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 10:11:37 PM | ||
Bitcoin is not as advertised Bitcoin Discussion
I still would like to see tentative explain me how he could create a chain of 90…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 10:22:24 PM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
Some are temporarily disallowed if their fee is too small, and they'll be includ…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 09:43:45 PM | ||
Some questions regarding block chain info, transaction limits, etc. Bitcoin Discussion
You'll never believe it but I typed a big long reply and then lost the whole thi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | November 04, 2010, 09:11:00 PM | ||
Decentralized Bitcoin scratch-off cards Development & Technical Discussion
The person creating the card generates an ECDSA keypair. This consists of two pi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 10:26:49 PM | ||
Decentralized Bitcoin scratch-off cards Development & Technical Discussion
Ok thanks for the prompt reply. There are just a couple of points I still don't…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 09:59:26 PM | ||
Decentralized Bitcoin scratch-off cards Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for going into a bit more detail. Unfortunately I believe you expect read…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 08:42:36 PM | ||
OpenSSL ciphers and App Engine Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for that. You might feel that you're mailing this stuff into a void but I…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 10:23:37 AM | ||
Decentralized Bitcoin scratch-off cards Development & Technical Discussion
That sounds fascinating. So the scripting language is fully enabled at the momen…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 10:20:51 AM | ||
no confirmations Bitcoin Discussion
Here's what could happen if somebody controls 50% of the nodes-that-are-acceptin…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 28, 2010, 09:34:40 AM | ||
Bitcoin darts Bitcoin Discussion
I would have liked to use something publicly verifiable for the hash used in det…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 27, 2010, 09:25:16 AM | ||
A lucrative attack on bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Here's how much it would cost (estimates) to make the block size go to various l…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 26, 2010, 05:49:00 PM | ||
A lucrative attack on bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
You seem to be holding two mutually contradictory postions, creighto.On the one…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 26, 2010, 02:22:47 PM | ||
A lucrative attack on bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Sure it does, the transaction fee schedule is written with the purpose of limiti…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 26, 2010, 03:35:36 AM | ||
A lucrative attack on bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin currently provides excellent security guarantees against forgery or othe…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 26, 2010, 01:40:36 AM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
Thank you theymos for taking the time to criticize the scheme in some detail.The…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 26, 2010, 01:23:49 AM | ||
Multiple Wallets, one computer (multiple accounts) Development & Technical Discussion
If you're running something like mybitcoin or mtgox or any other site that lets…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 25, 2010, 08:40:50 PM | ||
Suggestion: Allow short messages to be sent together with bitcoins ? Development & Technical Discussion
Is there anything stopping a competitor from doing it?A competitor to whom from…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 25, 2010, 12:07:10 AM | ||
Suggestion: Allow short messages to be sent together with bitcoins ? Development & Technical Discussion
Why should we reinvent the wheel when theres an existing way to do things ? When…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 24, 2010, 11:00:53 PM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
This is essentially already done....Neither of these are actually implemented ye…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 24, 2010, 10:21:42 PM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
Mobile phone application won't have to be a full bitcoin client nor server. It…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 24, 2010, 09:12:57 PM | ||
Suggestion: Allow short messages to be sent together with bitcoins ? Development & Technical Discussion
It would be unwise to have permanently recorded plaintext messages for everyone…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 24, 2010, 03:53:29 PM | ||
Python code for validating bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
(address =~ /^[a-zA-Z1-9]{33,35}$/) You should bear in mind the fact that 11111…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 19, 2010, 06:40:42 PM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
As far as verifying that the server isn't lying, I don't think that's possible w…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 17, 2010, 04:01:01 PM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks to ribuck for putting me right about client cheating. I have deleted the…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 15, 2010, 09:05:27 AM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think that trusted groups are needed if the probabalistic scheme is used…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 15, 2010, 12:57:39 AM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
You seem to value the accuracy provided by your "metahash" scheme while apparent…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 14, 2010, 11:23:00 PM | ||
Warning : Check your system ( Help me ) Bitcoin Technical Support
Just remind me why Bitcoin cares about the time? Is it just to change the diffic…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 14, 2010, 06:55:21 PM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
Your "metahash" method of measuring work, though more accurate than the probabli…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 14, 2010, 06:34:58 PM | ||
Pooled/Remote Mining Development & Technical Discussion
The distribution of bitcoins are actually included in the output of the generate…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 14, 2010, 01:36:47 PM | ||
Vanity bitcoin addresses: a new way to keep your CPU busy Development & Technical Discussion
ByteCoin: cool! Are you finding alternative public keys for a given ECC private…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 07, 2010, 06:39:10 PM | ||
Vanity bitcoin addresses: a new way to keep your CPU busy Development & Technical Discussion
lol you just invented bitcoin customised number plates!I believe I was the first…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | October 07, 2010, 12:18:06 PM | ||
Losing Critical Mass and Call to Action Bitcoin Discussion
1RayJSScakAmpRtQRbqyN5xfchKnqQNb9 is mine. Feel free to send 0.01btc and I'll s…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 14, 2010, 06:18:57 PM | ||
Losing Critical Mass and Call to Action Bitcoin Discussion
I have a couple bitcoin addresses that start with 1R, but they are very rare com…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 14, 2010, 09:14:10 AM | ||
Losing Critical Mass and Call to Action Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin excludes a few normal characters for the sake of readability, and a Bitc…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | September 14, 2010, 12:29:39 AM | ||
[PATCH] implement 'listtransactions' Development & Technical Discussion
I hope you have permission from the people in the converstation to post that. If…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 19, 2010, 12:18:45 PM | ||
Hiding the recipient and amount until the money is spent Development & Technical Discussion
Assuming you have enough memory to store all your public keys in a hash table in…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 10:01:14 PM | ||
Potential disaster scenario Bitcoin Discussion
A simple(?) modification of the algorithm would be to apply the adjustmentafter…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 12:55:22 PM | ||
Bitcoin Vocabulary Bitcoin Discussion
Useful. I have made some corrections for strict accuracy. If they are acceptable…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 12:37:38 PM | ||
Transaction Overload Solution Development & Technical Discussion
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7698#msg7698The transaction fee tr…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 12:11:47 PM | ||
Privacy versus Safety: handling change Development & Technical Discussion
Is it possible to get an address collision?Possible - yes. Practical - not at th…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 12:02:17 PM | ||
Anonymity Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 11:53:34 AM | ||
How to protect your wallet Development & Technical Discussion
The only thing you really need to back up and keep secret are the private keys w…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 11:43:13 AM | ||
Pros and cons of using new Bitcoin addresses for each transaction? Bitcoin Discussion
I think the number of addresses is like 33^62 (26+26+10?) that's over 10^94. If…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 11:30:56 AM | ||
Hiding the recipient and amount until the money is spent Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin needs to see TxOut amounts so it can add them up and make sure the trans…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 11:20:48 AM | ||
blocks minus 1 Development & Technical Discussion
Agreed. Seems like a change for the better.
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 11:04:48 AM | ||
Hiding the recipient and amount until the money is spent Development & Technical Discussion
This offers the same anonymity as using a new address each time? And you would s…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 16, 2010, 08:49:00 AM | ||
Hiding the recipient and amount until the money is spent Development & Technical Discussion
The signed TxIns are not encrypted. The network checks that they haven't been sp…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2010, 06:31:49 PM | ||
[PATCH] implement 'listtransactions' Development & Technical Discussion
Most transactions are not "rolled back" when two chains recombine. Transactions…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2010, 05:01:28 AM | ||
Hiding the recipient and amount until the money is spent Development & Technical Discussion
We can change transactions so that nobody can tell who the recipient is and how…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2010, 04:53:18 AM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
This is different. The balance sheet was a way of rolling up known transactions…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2010, 01:35:01 AM | ||
[PATCH] implement 'listtransactions' Development & Technical Discussion
Generated blocks show up as mixed_debit until they "mature", which is around 120…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 15, 2010, 12:34:01 AM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
Nope, this is a much different solution.I quoted the following portion of your p…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 14, 2010, 11:58:23 PM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
What we need is a way to generate additional blinded variations of a public key.…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 14, 2010, 10:12:09 PM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
An interesting feature is that this simplifies the validation process. All that…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 14, 2010, 09:46:52 PM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
If there was a transaction for each transaction fee, then what about the transac…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | August 05, 2010, 11:45:58 AM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
I don't think that's how public keys work. You can't arbitrarily choose a publi…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 23, 2010, 10:57:34 PM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
I just had a bit of a brainwave as to how we could implement "balance sheets" as…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 23, 2010, 07:16:25 AM | ||
With "Balance sheets" most of the block chain can be forgotten. Bitcoin Discussion
I'd just like to clarify that "balance sheets" as I outlined them were not "ligh…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 22, 2010, 08:30:19 PM | ||
Largest transaction so far 35000BTC in block 65566 Economics
The largest transaction so far is 35000BTC in block 65566.This block had about 1…
|
n/a | ByteCoin | July 22, 2010, 02:45:14 PM |