| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) Bitcoin Discussion
This is FUD, and a lot of people are trying to use this against Core. Any develo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 20, 2016, 10:54:08 PM |
|
|
|
Blockstream/Core: Support of DDOS Attacks on Classic Altcoin Discussion
When you're telling outrageous lies like this, you might also want to make up so…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 17, 2016, 06:41:58 PM |
|
|
|
Mike Hearn is wrong. Bitcoin isn't dead Bitcoin Discussion
Mike Hearn is R3CEV's bitch now, he has sold his soul to the devil, now he has t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 17, 2016, 03:26:16 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Just in case you were getting used to the upward moving price; looks like it's t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 13, 2015, 04:43:30 AM |
|
|
|
Transaction cut-through Development & Technical Discussion
Has anyone done research into simulations to estimate the possible savings which…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 11, 2015, 02:16:18 PM |
|
|
|
Segregated witness - The solution to Scalability (short term) Development & Technical Discussion
My fear is that we will be into 2017 before anything is deployed,I don't think…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 10, 2015, 05:47:36 AM |
|
|
|
Gmaxwell proves Craig Wright is a fraud Bitcoin Discussion
Craig was building PGP from source himself at the time. It would have included a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 10, 2015, 05:28:16 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
I paint jtoomim You're going to need a lot of paint, because misrepresenting the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 08, 2015, 08:05:15 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
to have an alert key and there are risk associated with him having it.A bogus al…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 08, 2015, 01:51:08 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
There were only a couple devs that wanted to keep the 1MB limit , most were in f…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 07, 2015, 01:18:40 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Segwitness is awesome... and an actual advance in scalablity, not just a paramet…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 07, 2015, 05:31:47 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Tehehe: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3vpb0u/think_bitcoin_20_is_a_goo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 06, 2015, 05:58:32 PM |
|
|
|
Delayed Replace By Fee (RBF) Development & Technical Discussion
Don't miss the FAQ: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3urm8o/optin_rbf_i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 05, 2015, 08:31:56 PM |
|
|
|
CoinShuffle: Practical Decentralized Coin Mixing for Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
I feel like JoinMarket might be a dead end precisely due to what CoinShuffle cla…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 05, 2015, 08:10:47 PM |
|
|
|
Delayed Replace By Fee (RBF) Development & Technical Discussion
Satoshi would be disgusted.If so why would the system's creator have put opt-in…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 04, 2015, 06:45:10 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
It's good that instrumentation and controls are coming. IMO they are a couple y…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 03, 2015, 03:25:32 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Bigger blocks (with at least some reasonable upper bound) make spam attacks more…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 02, 2015, 02:26:28 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
From a little watching of my connection activity, I observed that a lot of the u…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 01, 2015, 09:20:50 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
And yet this information is ruthlessly attacked whenever it is pointed out-- I a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 01, 2015, 01:35:57 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
We should not restrict anyone from being able to run a node, nor should we make…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | December 01, 2015, 03:06:32 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Wrong, wrong and more wrong.The 1MB limit was put in place in 2010, not 2008. Ac…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 30, 2015, 10:23:27 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
You keep saying that it is opt-in however it is only opt-in for the sender not t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 30, 2015, 07:08:50 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
When there are technical experts stating opposing things it is hard for people l…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 30, 2015, 12:12:49 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
It reduces the functionality of zero confirmation transactions.No it doesn't.Quo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 30, 2015, 06:10:01 AM |
|
|
|
CoinSwap: Transaction graph disjoint trustless trading Development & Technical Discussion
There are no funds at that 'location'. No funds are ever sent the revealed key…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 30, 2015, 04:23:43 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
The modern large miners are mostly not pools in the historic sense. They own mos…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 28, 2015, 08:47:46 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
If hypothetically more then seventy five percent of the miners supported BIP101…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 28, 2015, 08:52:11 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
About being short sighted, are you talking about Core devs procrastination two y…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 28, 2015, 08:39:17 AM |
|
|
|
CoinSwap: Transaction graph disjoint trustless trading Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think this will work - I was looking into private key reveal schemes in…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 27, 2015, 12:23:30 PM |
|
|
|
CoinSwap: Transaction graph disjoint trustless trading Development & Technical Discussion
Here is a private atomic swap that doesn't need the multiphase "CoinSwap" transf…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 26, 2015, 01:02:56 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
That's supposed to tell us what exactly? That under the most optimal technical e…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 25, 2015, 07:56:38 PM |
|
|
|
O(1) Block Propagation, IBLT Development & Technical Discussion
Some propose ordering them, but that promotes censorship and centralization.Orde…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 25, 2015, 02:08:28 AM |
|
|
|
bitcoin-cli listtransactions not working for watch-only address Development & Technical Discussion
You're asking about account "" but you imported the address in account "1GkktBuJ…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 22, 2015, 09:34:42 PM |
|
|
|
bitcoin-cli listtransactions not working for watch-only address Development & Technical Discussion
The empty quotes were not optional, the account name field is missing in your ex…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 22, 2015, 05:41:00 PM |
|
|
|
Priority Transactions; What Are The Implications? Development & Technical Discussion
I am boggling at people making a big deal about this.Exchanges and such getting…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 21, 2015, 01:03:52 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
QuoteThe BTTC event will forceWhat? Miners have taken payments for prioritizing…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 21, 2015, 05:14:37 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin should not have any leadership, which is why the development needs to be…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 20, 2015, 06:14:29 AM |
|
|
|
Protection against botnet DDoS of invalid (signature or otherwise) transactions? Development & Technical Discussion
There are ways to harden against these attacks-- e.g. require expensive POW on c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 20, 2015, 04:20:27 AM |
|
|
|
Notes on the use of midstate compression for coinbase transaction commitments Development & Technical Discussion
Merkle damgard construction fragile? How so?Wikipedia has a list of generic atta…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 20, 2015, 01:27:12 AM |
|
|
|
Notes on the use of midstate compression for coinbase transaction commitments Development & Technical Discussion
I thought I'd leave a note for posterity related to the reoccurring scheme of us…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 19, 2015, 06:31:55 PM |
|
|
|
Segregated Witness Development & Technical Discussion
We have a new design, a logical refinement from the earlier one, which is substa…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 19, 2015, 06:15:35 PM |
|
|
|
Suggestion: Button that check/uncheck "send this transaction anonymously" Development & Technical Discussion
Tracing funds is incompatible with "cash", and somewhat incompatible with the de…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 17, 2015, 05:50:58 PM |
|
|
|
O(1) Block Propagation, IBLT Development & Technical Discussion
This is a big topic especially for [...] which hold the majority of the networks…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 17, 2015, 05:49:07 PM |
|
|
|
Are there any plans to release Core 0.10.4? Development & Technical Discussion
0.10.4 binaries were just waiting on more confirming builds, the software is don…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 16, 2015, 06:06:58 PM |
|
|
|
O(1) Block Propagation, IBLT Development & Technical Discussion
What is important is seeing the implementation of some level of block propagatio…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 16, 2015, 05:25:08 PM |
|
|
|
Is it secure to use bitcoin private public key for message encryption? Development & Technical Discussion
The message encryption is not done by the elliptic curve when using ECIES, conve…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 15, 2015, 07:01:16 PM |
|
|
|
Is it secure to use bitcoin private public key for message encryption? Development & Technical Discussion
Regarding the security when using the public key for message encryption:The secu…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 14, 2015, 06:39:17 PM |
|
|
|
Partial validating nodes Development & Technical Discussion
"You do them without a UTXO commitment by instead committing to the input block…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 13, 2015, 02:55:30 AM |
|
|
|
Encrypt a message with bitcoin public key? Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | gmaxwell | November 09, 2015, 03:15:21 PM |
|
|
|
Encrypt a message with bitcoin public key? Development & Technical Discussion
Now, you may want to send a message to the person whom you are sending bitcoins.…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 07, 2015, 01:27:14 PM |
|
|
|
BIP 0065 Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | gmaxwell | November 08, 2015, 02:57:05 PM |
|
|
|
BIP 0065 Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | gmaxwell | November 08, 2015, 02:29:03 PM |
|
|
|
Encrypt a message with bitcoin public key? Development & Technical Discussion
A bitcoin address is NOT a public key.A bitcoin address absolutely IS a (seriali…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 06, 2015, 06:04:48 PM |
|
|
|
OP_XXX: How to take current block height? Development & Technical Discussion
Will 0.11.2 have these OPs? Or they are only planned in future like sidechains O…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 05, 2015, 01:40:11 PM |
|
|
|
OP_XXX: How to take current block height? Development & Technical Discussion
I guess that will be once 0.12 is released.Soft-forks shouldn't be and aren't ti…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 04, 2015, 09:45:52 PM |
|
|
|
Running bitcoind in pruning mode Development & Technical Discussion
You still verify and relay transactions. Other nodes can no longer get block fro…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 04, 2015, 11:31:57 AM |
|
|
|
Synchronizing wallet balance from a pruned node Development & Technical Discussion
Doing that invalidates the security provided by running it in the first place. (…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | November 01, 2015, 01:46:42 AM |
|
|
|
Synchronizing wallet balance from a pruned node Development & Technical Discussion
if I didn't import enough watch-only addresses] and then use listunspent RPC.So…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 31, 2015, 05:15:45 AM |
|
|
|
Ghost address 1HT7xU2Ngenf7D4yocz2SAcnNLW7rK8d4E appeared in my wallet.dat Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, I experienced corrupted wallet issue and I resolved it via -salvagewallet o…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 29, 2015, 06:50:41 PM |
|
|
|
Ghost address 1HT7xU2Ngenf7D4yocz2SAcnNLW7rK8d4E appeared in my wallet.dat Development & Technical Discussion
seen this. thanks. still, how it ended up in my wallet? with the private key in…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 29, 2015, 01:36:03 PM |
|
|
|
Ghost address 1HT7xU2Ngenf7D4yocz2SAcnNLW7rK8d4E appeared in my wallet.dat Development & Technical Discussion
Is this wallet encrypted?Would you be willing and/or able to test a patch?
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 28, 2015, 04:09:33 PM |
|
|
|
What is the best SPV for handling large number of users? Wallet software
Services providing services to other users should almost certainly not be using…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 28, 2015, 12:39:58 AM |
|
|
|
Why are transaction malleable in the first place? Development & Technical Discussion
They shouldn't be malleable; lack of canonicalization was an oversight.Canonical…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 27, 2015, 01:12:47 AM |
|
|
|
What is most best way to agree on something if all actors are known? Services
When all the actors are known the problem you're trying to solve is called "dist…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 26, 2015, 07:37:49 PM |
|
|
|
tampering with bip70 payment requests Development & Technical Discussion
The mechanism would be that you've transported it over a secure transport in the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 26, 2015, 07:22:42 PM |
|
|
|
Dust threshold changed without any mention in 0.11.1 Development & Technical Discussion
How do you define toxic waste exactly ? Any usage which does not use bitcoin as…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 26, 2015, 02:12:50 AM |
|
|
|
Dust threshold changed without any mention in 0.11.1 Development & Technical Discussion
Using Bitcoin for other than monetary purpose is not abuse if you are willing to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 25, 2015, 11:42:52 PM |
|
|
|
Block lattice Altcoin Discussion
It appears (from the writeup) that you are unaware of sybil attacks?The graph of…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 24, 2015, 03:30:15 PM |
|
|
|
Should websites refuse to send coins to an already used address? Development & Technical Discussion
Two more.questions regarding to that:1) It was known how to generate a new addre…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 24, 2015, 03:16:26 PM |
|
|
|
Should websites refuse to send coins to an already used address? Development & Technical Discussion
Reuse of an address is the sole business of its owner. It's a matter of choice,…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 23, 2015, 03:46:37 PM |
|
|
|
Why are transaction malleable in the first place? Development & Technical Discussion
Although the CIYAM Wallet is not currently being used (except for testing by mys…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 23, 2015, 12:16:04 PM |
|
|
|
Why are transaction malleable in the first place? Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for your reply.One standard issue in cryptography that I was alluding to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 22, 2015, 07:15:48 PM |
|
|
|
Should websites refuse to send coins to an already used address? Development & Technical Discussion
Warning about it, at least, would be productive-- as there has been a fair amoun…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 22, 2015, 06:42:45 PM |
|
|
|
Dust threshold changed without any mention in 0.11.1 Development & Technical Discussion
Boy what a bad loser you are. End users will read these notes:Don't look at me:…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 22, 2015, 02:49:33 AM |
|
|
|
Why are transaction malleable in the first place? Development & Technical Discussion
That "mild" denial of service attack is likely to be perceived as a failure of t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 21, 2015, 05:32:45 PM |
|
|
|
Dust threshold changed without any mention in 0.11.1 Development & Technical Discussion
WTF are you talking about? What you might see as abusive is by no means an objec…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 21, 2015, 04:59:16 PM |
|
|
|
Why are transaction malleable in the first place? Development & Technical Discussion
This is a standard problem in cryptography and has a standard solution. In other…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 21, 2015, 04:32:22 AM |
|
|
|
A quick idea, mining tokens Development & Technical Discussion
Step 1. Monopolize tokensStep 2. Totally control system.Step 3. Profit.The reaso…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 21, 2015, 03:44:46 AM |
|
|
|
Dust threshold changed without any mention in 0.11.1 Development & Technical Discussion
If you are not using the Bitcoin currency except incidentally but instead abusin…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 21, 2015, 02:32:57 AM |
|
|
|
Zero Knowledge Transactions Altcoin Discussion
1. Plagiarize the work, shared freely, of Adam Back, Shen, Denis, myself, and ot…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 17, 2015, 01:41:58 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
This is very close to hardfork. Yes. I do understand that it is not a hardfork i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 15, 2015, 06:57:34 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
Are there any negatives to this fix?I suggest reading this thread.Seriously. suc…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 15, 2015, 02:11:15 AM |
|
|
|
Fees for full nodes? Development & Technical Discussion
Currently, pruning is not the solution. You should be able to operate a full nod…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 14, 2015, 07:37:14 PM |
|
|
|
Feature that should be added Development & Technical Discussion
But you can't fall under the trap of keeping Bitcoin Core as a super limited sof…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 14, 2015, 12:18:27 PM |
|
|
|
A mistake in bitcoin.org? (Satoshi's github account) Development & Technical Discussion
Because s_nakamoto@1a98c847-1fd6-4fd8-948a-caf3550aa51b was never an account on…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 13, 2015, 09:49:58 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
The is an easy rule-of-thumb to spot high-S signatures. For example, the follow…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 08, 2015, 12:43:32 PM |
|
|
|
Confidential Transactions, Content privacy for Bitcoin transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Does it mean that x and a are to be communicated privately (off-chain) from send…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 08, 2015, 12:41:10 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
declare the other wallet developers out of boundsI declare all software that doe…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 08, 2015, 02:38:25 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin maleabity attack - who made it and is it still running? Bitcoin Discussion
Please explain (or reference an explanation) as to why malleability features wou…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 07, 2015, 08:13:56 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin maleabity attack - who made it and is it still running? Bitcoin Discussion
The problem is that a known bug in the bitcoin protocol has festered for years.…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 07, 2015, 02:35:08 PM |
|
|
|
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY source code clarification Development & Technical Discussion
It is saying that if this case weren't rejected then CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY could b…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 06, 2015, 04:04:33 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
If you are changing bitcoin core in response to this you are likely doing someth…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 06, 2015, 03:22:33 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, and that sounds like a good solution. Miners could mutate all transactions…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 05, 2015, 06:28:14 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin concept is broken. Nobody can fix it. Point.Not so! (well, if the concep…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 05, 2015, 12:56:05 PM |
|
|
|
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? Development & Technical Discussion
I'm curious, why is `SCRIPT_VERIFY_LOW_S` not a standard verification flag?Becau…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | October 05, 2015, 01:36:21 AM |
|
|
|
Format for full file signatures Development & Technical Discussion
Bitsig does not (yet!) include any PKI infrastructure possibilities, and is ther…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | September 26, 2015, 03:10:01 PM |
|
|
|
Format for full file signatures Development & Technical Discussion
Yes. Bitcoin uses digital signatures. It also uses addition. And linked lists. …
|
n/a | gmaxwell | September 25, 2015, 01:59:11 PM |
|
|
|
Any safe way to config RPC when running on TOR? Bitcoin Technical Support
Tor hidden service support can only connect to the specified ports in the tor co…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | September 25, 2015, 01:12:45 PM |
|
|
|
Two Full Nodes, Same Router Development & Technical Discussion
It appears that in order to run a full node port 8333 must be forwarded to that…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | September 21, 2015, 08:20:49 PM |
|
|
|
Reducing the orphan rate to 0 in a >100k TPS chain Development & Technical Discussion
I think you're missing my point: There is no reason to care about orphans absen…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | September 19, 2015, 05:28:38 PM |
Jump to: