Topic: / (Read 4296 times)
A NSA Soma hit to KO
The correct spelling is An NSA Soma hit to KO.
I don't get it. It's weird. I think the real satoshi nakamoto is a man which his name is Otoma Kanih Sotas. He is living happily now in his house.
A NSA Soma hit to KO
The correct spelling is An NSA Soma hit to KO.
Are you saying the correct spelling is Satoshi Nnakamoto?
A NSA Soma hit to KO
The correct spelling is An NSA Soma hit to KO.
Top secret operations do not use cute little anagrams. I's not a contest that drops hints.
I'm not too sure about that, I heard the powers that be in America are quite partial to anagrams:
Central Intelligence Agency: Elect tyrannical negligence
George Bush and the CIA: Huge gastric bonehead
Republican Party candidate George W Bush: Spectacular beating power-hungry baddie
NSA wrote a paper on digital currency in 1996
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm
there's someone named Tatsuaki Okamoto who was involved, the name is close to Satoshi Nakamoto
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm
there's someone named Tatsuaki Okamoto who was involved, the name is close to Satoshi Nakamoto
A terrifying and apocalyptic scenario could be that NSA ( or some other "big brother" ) created Bitcoin to set up a new global currency in order to associate every address to every person in the world, just to easily control every single transaction of every single user in the world ( 'cause we all know Bitcoin transaction are public ).
In my opinion everything is possible, but this scenario is highly unrealistic. This for 3 main reasons:
1. Bitcoin is open source.
2. Thanks to the aspect above, many developers are able to create new coins, based on Bitcoin algo. Yes, in some cases they made some changes, but the important thing is that they based their coins on BTC. In other words, if Bitcoin never existed, altcoins never existed too, no doubt 'bout it.
A relevant aspect is that Satoshi Nakamoto is still an anonymous, while several altcoins devs are well-know in the community ( like Evan Duffield for example ). So if we have some doubt on Bitcoin cause we don't know who found it, we could simply move to another cryptocoin, which ensure us more privacy are more reliance.
3. If Bitcoin had been created by a so powerful organization ( like NSA ) , at this point, after 6 years, it would be much more popular and adopted all over the world. They would set up a majestic media campaign or even force people to use Bitcoin. Nothing of it happens so I think your theory is quite improbable.
In my opinion everything is possible, but this scenario is highly unrealistic. This for 3 main reasons:
1. Bitcoin is open source.
2. Thanks to the aspect above, many developers are able to create new coins, based on Bitcoin algo. Yes, in some cases they made some changes, but the important thing is that they based their coins on BTC. In other words, if Bitcoin never existed, altcoins never existed too, no doubt 'bout it.
A relevant aspect is that Satoshi Nakamoto is still an anonymous, while several altcoins devs are well-know in the community ( like Evan Duffield for example ). So if we have some doubt on Bitcoin cause we don't know who found it, we could simply move to another cryptocoin, which ensure us more privacy are more reliance.
3. If Bitcoin had been created by a so powerful organization ( like NSA ) , at this point, after 6 years, it would be much more popular and adopted all over the world. They would set up a majestic media campaign or even force people to use Bitcoin. Nothing of it happens so I think your theory is quite improbable.
I think point 1 is enough to discredit the Bitcoin is NSA conspiracy theory. They would never do this under open source software, it's self defeating. Im sure they want to get rid of physical cash in the future, and they will release their own "coin" but of course closed source and ingrained within the electronic fiat scam. Hopefully people doesn't fall for it and adopts Bitcoin instead.
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
I agree with you
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
And the predictable cover-up attempts begin! Just more proof that I'm onto something they don't want people to know about.
LaudaM is a CIA agent...
Tin-Foil Hat Alert: Bitcoin certainly would make the perfect currency solution for global governance, to create a cashless society where every transaction could be traced and exist forever in a database that can be looked at later - if all the worlds government would work together (or be taken over). All you would need to do is control every major ISP, which would control what miners would be allowed to access the network, then only the miners who follow the "rules" would be allowed network access. Those "rules" could include registering of addresses, regulation of the protocol, ability to seize coins by court order or bureaucratic mandate, etc... I mean the USA already passed laws and executive orders giving the government control of all communications and the internet for our national security, privacy and our "protection". We call that Net Neutrality, and it spreading all over the world to keep "a free and open internet".... controlled by your favorite dictators in chief... just sayin'.
Check this out:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000
Sorry if someone posted it already, I didnt read the middle 2 pages.
Here's my favorite one, which lets me know for sure it was the Freemasons and not the NSA:
Aha Masons It Took
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000
Sorry if someone posted it already, I didnt read the middle 2 pages.
Here's my favorite one, which lets me know for sure it was the Freemasons and not the NSA:
Aha Masons It Took
" satanist oak homo" is the best imho
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
And the predictable cover-up attempts begin! Just more proof that I'm onto something they don't want people to know about.
LOL. Nice
Agreed the inflationary tactics of banks is what causes the boom and bust cycle.
Quote from: John Whitfield. “Ancient Traders Suffered Boom and Bust.” _Nature_ (2002). Web. 16 May 2015. link=http://www.nature.com/nsu/020101/020101-9.html
Ancient Babylonian trading markets were as volatile as our own, says an economic historian. Prices of agricultural goods in the city fluctuated hugely, and the death of Alexander the Great triggered two decades of economic instability1.
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
bitcoin has not flaws, if you are thinking the contrary .... then please explain or better illustrate these flaws
. Remember that bitcoin was created only few years ago and it can surpass and 'destroy' the actual economic system (because it is better and more easier to use).Obviously I agree with your later point, you're preaching to the choir.
In regard to flaws (and/or weaknesses), since nothing is perfect, here you go.
Hmm interesting 'flaws' but bitcoin is still better (100 times more) than the actual economic system based on banks and FIAT currencies. An human cannot create something 100% perfect (this is obvious) but maybe he can reaches 99% (and remember this is still an experiment).
Agreed the inflationary tactics of banks is what causes the boom and bust cycle.
Check this out:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000
Sorry if someone posted it already, I didnt read the middle 2 pages.
Here's my favorite one, which lets me know for sure it was the Freemasons and not the NSA:
Aha Masons It Took
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000
Sorry if someone posted it already, I didnt read the middle 2 pages.
Here's my favorite one, which lets me know for sure it was the Freemasons and not the NSA:
Aha Masons It Took
3. If Bitcoin had been created by a so powerful organization ( like NSA ) , at this point, after 6 years, it would be much more popular and adopted all over the world. They would set up a majestic media campaign or even force people to use Bitcoin. Nothing of it happens so I think your theory is quite improbable.
Quote from: Woodrow Wilson link=http://www.is.wayne.edu/MNISSANI/RevolutionarysToolkit/StrategicLessons.htm
What is the use of voting? We know that the machines of both parties are subsidized by the same persons, and therefore it is useless to turn in either direction.
Quote from: Vladimir Ilich Lenin link=http://www.is.wayne.edu/MNISSANI/RevolutionarysToolkit/StrategicLessons.htm
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
A terrifying and apocalyptic scenario could be that NSA ( or some other "big brother" ) created Bitcoin to set up a new global currency in order to associate every address to every person in the world, just to easily control every single transaction of every single user in the world ( 'cause we all know Bitcoin transaction are public ).
In my opinion everything is possible, but this scenario is highly unrealistic. This for 3 main reasons:
1. Bitcoin is open source.
2. Thanks to the aspect above, many developers are able to create new coins, based on Bitcoin algo. Yes, in some cases they made some changes, but the important thing is that they based their coins on BTC. In other words, if Bitcoin never existed, altcoins never existed too, no doubt 'bout it.
A relevant aspect is that Satoshi Nakamoto is still an anonymous, while several altcoins devs are well-know in the community ( like Evan Duffield for example ). So if we have some doubt on Bitcoin cause we don't know who found it, we could simply move to another cryptocoin, which ensure us more privacy are more reliance.
3. If Bitcoin had been created by a so powerful organization ( like NSA ) , at this point, after 6 years, it would be much more popular and adopted all over the world. They would set up a majestic media campaign or even force people to use Bitcoin. Nothing of it happens so I think your theory is quite improbable.
In my opinion everything is possible, but this scenario is highly unrealistic. This for 3 main reasons:
1. Bitcoin is open source.
2. Thanks to the aspect above, many developers are able to create new coins, based on Bitcoin algo. Yes, in some cases they made some changes, but the important thing is that they based their coins on BTC. In other words, if Bitcoin never existed, altcoins never existed too, no doubt 'bout it.
A relevant aspect is that Satoshi Nakamoto is still an anonymous, while several altcoins devs are well-know in the community ( like Evan Duffield for example ). So if we have some doubt on Bitcoin cause we don't know who found it, we could simply move to another cryptocoin, which ensure us more privacy are more reliance.
3. If Bitcoin had been created by a so powerful organization ( like NSA ) , at this point, after 6 years, it would be much more popular and adopted all over the world. They would set up a majestic media campaign or even force people to use Bitcoin. Nothing of it happens so I think your theory is quite improbable.
Jump to: