NSA for sure can find who Satoshi Nakamoto is
and maybe he already has found job in USA,maybe CIA or something ,becouse of his skills
offcourse paid in bitcoin
Soma is a fictional drug from the Aldous Huxley novel "Brave New World," which is used to keep the masses docile and controllable
And btc we can consider btc like a drug,drug is opening eyes for a while,but if to be to much attached,can destroy
That book is preety good
Topic: / - page 3. (Read 4254 times)
And the predictable cover-up attempts begin! Just more proof that I'm onto something they don't want people to know about.
More proof you're nothing but a loon, LaudaM makes points and you say it is proof that you're right without acknowledging the information just given to you. Valence your name is an anagram of Enclave, such as could you be an NSA spy surrounded by members? No, it's just a damn anagram.
Well I certainly don't agree with Laudam's point that bitcoin has no flaws. I also think it matters a lot who created bitcoin, but that's besides the point. Not sure what you mean by "NSA spy surrounded by members," so can't respond to that particular accusation.
These ad hominim attacks are telling, the truth hurts i guess.
I said that Bitcoin currently has no flaws. This means that tomorrow someone could come up with a way to break SHA256 and such.
If you say this is false, please provide me with the evidence of those alleged flaws. Anyone is free to verify the code for themselves to check if anything is broken.
In this case: minor bug =/= flaw; weakness =/= flaw.
At the end of the day, consider this: Even if Satoshi Nakamoto was a team of NSA geniuses at work, it wouldn't even matter. First of all, the project is open source and does everything we expect. Second of all, other technology created by the gov, in this case TOR, ended up as useful for the common folk. Hell even the internet was some secret army shit.
Why would NSA go to all the trouble creating this huge sprawling secret organization then drop the simplest easiest to figure out clue right in the open? It makes no sense that an entity who could build a virtually uncrackable code would try and hide something in a puzzle so simple that a child could see through it.
Don't worry OP, they are filming new episodes of Xfiles soon, you can fantasize all over that kindergarten-level shiz real soon and you wont have to make an ass of yourself in here anymore.
Don't worry OP, they are filming new episodes of Xfiles soon, you can fantasize all over that kindergarten-level shiz real soon and you wont have to make an ass of yourself in here anymore.
Top secret operations do not use cute little anagrams. I's not a contest that drops hints.
Open your eyes bro, that's just what they want you to think. ...
THEY? This is something you made up this morning, lol.
now if you want a real code breaking challenge you may be interested in this:
https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code
Codes and breaking them is real spycraft, but it ain't easy. And since it tends to be a natural ability more than a learned skill agencies are always on the lookout for young talent.
Guilty as charged
I'm procrastinating from what I really have to get done this morning, which is draft and send a demand letter to a pre-paid debit card company that closed my account and is trying to get out of sending me a check for the account balance. Making up conspiracy theories is much more fun than threatening to sue crooked banks 
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
bitcoin has not flaws, if you are thinking the contrary .... then please explain or better illustrate these flaws
. Remember that bitcoin was created only few years ago and it can surpass and 'destroy' the actual economic system (because it is better and more easier to use).Obviously I agree with your later point, you're preaching to the choir.
In regard to flaws (and/or weaknesses), since nothing is perfect, here you go.
Please stop these useless conspiracy theories. It does not matter if Satoshi was just a regular man, CIA or NSA agent.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
Bitcoin is open source; Bitcoin works and currently has no flaws. It does not matter who created it.
End of story.
bitcoin has not flaws, if you are thinking the contrary .... then please explain or better illustrate these flaws
. Remember that bitcoin was created only few years ago and it can surpass and 'destroy' the actual economic system (because it is better and more easier to use).
You mention this was a single, isolated secret ops program but I disagree. I think the NSA made over 100,000 smaller ops programs all under the "Satoshi Nakamoto" umbrella.
This proves it: http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000&a=n
This proves it: http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satoshi+nakamoto&t=1000&a=n
I think that you just have too much spare time.
Do you really think that govt would pump money in an open source project that is actually against the govt's monopoly over the "value" of the money? (I talk about inflation politics).
It recently occurred to me that all this speculation about "who" Satoshi is might be a red herring, and that the name does not stand for an individual person but for a top secret gov't operation. Then I started to wonder how to crack the enigma of that elusive name, and it soon became clear that it had to be an anagram for something. As I researched further into this I became convinced that this has to be the answer to "who" Satoshi is. After some exhaustive work I arrived at what seems to me the most likely decipherment of the code and I now present it in these forums for the review of the bitcoin community. You may not agree with the specific anagram I came up with as there are many other possibilities. But it seems undeniable that the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" is some kind of code. Solving the code could be the key to the survival of bitcoin. Here's the anagram I came up with:
A NSA Soma hit to KO
KO is of course a term from the sport of boxing which means "knockout." Soma is a fictional drug from the Aldous Huxley novel "Brave New World," which is used to keep the masses docile and controllable. I don't think the term "NSA" requires any explanation in these forums.
And with this it becomes clear what's really going on with bitcoin. I'm not saying to avoid bitcoin and never use it. It's possible that the people will be able to re-direct bitcoin from its original purposes of governmental control, or even to create a new crypto with different aims. But an awareness of these hidden realities is advisable as we move into an unknown future.
No.
Not because I think that NSA had nothing to do with it, because it might, nobody knows.
I am saying no because your anagram is not convincing.
In fact it sounds like gibberish.
Well don't blame me, the NSA came up with it I just deciphered it. There are, howerver, other possibilities:
oh i am nsa task too
I mask nsa oath too
There is a lot of anagrams with "satoshi nakamoto" words.
Also I think that you can find some good phrases also with "SS" (Schutz-staffeln),
And so on... but i think that your good analysis is not scientific
but is more "a monte carlo" solution to a problem that you decide where to fit (convergence).Attention!
I am not able to say that "NSA CIA FBI" or whatelse are not implicated, by the way if there is a fog of anonymity, who is behind the creation of the protocol could be "everyone".
No I am not ...
I'm not sure if this is serious or not, but I'd like to hope that it's not. It reminds me of those pitiful attempts that try to convince people that the Illuminati is behind everything and present an image of a triangle as evidence. An anagram doesn't serve as appropriate proof of such bold claims in any way.
Top secret operations do not use cute little anagrams. I's not a contest that drops hints.
Open your eyes bro, that's just what they want you to think. They depend on codes built into their public names, sorta like how private key encryption derives public keys from private keys through the use of passwords. How else will allied agencies and operations communicate with each-other without risking the interception of their signals. They build secret info into names so that various deep-cover agents and groups can retrieve the information without the use of radio signals.
I just broke their code and instead of thanking me you guys are attacking me. Fine suit yourselves, go on living in the dark until they decide it's time to bring down the gauntlet.
You're just going to get responses from bashers in a thread like this
Top secret operations do not use cute little anagrams. I's not a contest that drops hints.
Open your eyes bro, that's just what they want you to think. ...
THEY? This is something you made up this morning, lol.
now if you want a real code breaking challenge you may be interested in this:
https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code
Codes and breaking them is real spycraft, but it ain't easy. And since it tends to be a natural ability more than a learned skill agencies are always on the lookout for young talent.
It recently occurred to me that all this speculation about "who" Satoshi is might be a red herring, and that the name does not stand for an individual person but for a top secret gov't operation. Then I started to wonder how to crack the enigma of that elusive name, and it soon became clear that it had to be an anagram for something. As I researched further into this I became convinced that this has to be the answer to "who" Satoshi is. After some exhaustive work I arrived at what seems to me the most likely decipherment of the code and I now present it in these forums for the review of the bitcoin community. You may not agree with the specific anagram I came up with as there are many other possibilities. But it seems undeniable that the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" is some kind of code. Solving the code could be the key to the survival of bitcoin. Here's the anagram I came up with:
A NSA Soma hit to KO
KO is of course a term from the sport of boxing which means "knockout." Soma is a fictional drug from the Aldous Huxley novel "Brave New World," which is used to keep the masses docile and controllable. I don't think the term "NSA" requires any explanation in these forums.
And with this it becomes clear what's really going on with bitcoin. I'm not saying to avoid bitcoin and never use it. It's possible that the people will be able to re-direct bitcoin from its original purposes of governmental control, or even to create a new crypto with different aims. But an awareness of these hidden realities is advisable as we move into an unknown future.
First of all, government secret operations do not usually name a program (or "code name") that actually corresponds in a meaningful way to the actual purpose of the program. It is more likely that if it was a secret op, that the creator would be associated with an actual person in society, for credibility and mass adoption.
Second of all, if you really think about Bitcoin/bitcoin, and all its possibilities and how it can truly change many systems that exist today (ex. tech, banking, government, social), then I personally do not believe a secret op would want to create and release this upon the world. If you and your group liked the status quo and were attempting to maintain it, I do not believe Bitcoin/bitcoin in the long run, will help your objectives. It could potentially erode it.
Even though I enjoy reading the Satoshi conspiracy theories, I do not believe he created Bitcoin/bitcoin to control people, but to free them.
Jump to: