Pages:
Author

Topic: ... - page 5. (Read 5420 times)

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 502
August 18, 2015, 07:46:23 AM
#11
No less than 250 nodes are virtual servers from Amazon, Microsoft, Digital Ocean, etc. Seems like almost every company that offers free trials has at least a handful of Bitcoin XT servers.

This data is meaningless if you don't compare it against the stats of nodes running Bitcoin Core. Even with that, your conclusion seems to be silly: The fact that a node runs on a VPS does in no way indicate that the respective node has been obtained for free and for the sole purpose of increasing node count.

Apart from your shoddy reasoning, you ignore the fact that cloud-based infrastructure is just a very normal fact of today's businesses. Also, only a very small percentage of cloud servers have been obtained for free, for most of them clients are paying real money (else the providers would go under, no?) We certainly run all of our infrastructure on cloud-based systems, and we pay thousands of $ per month for that. And yes, we are running bitcoin nodes on these servers.

Additionally, I doubt that the servers that you can get for free are even capable of running a node due to their limited resources (although I am not sure whether this is true for all providers).
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
August 18, 2015, 07:17:13 AM
#10
Interesting, but what will happen when the trial ends and the nodes shut down ? Will the transactions need more time to proceed ?
donator
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
August 18, 2015, 06:31:55 AM
#9
There are 100% of non-XT (Non-BIP101) blocks. They have zero hashing power yet.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
August 18, 2015, 06:15:29 AM
#8
What does mining have to do with full nodes?
You, again, fail to understand fundamentals of Bitcoin.

If you look at http://xtnodes.com/ you see, that "Bitcoin XT nodes" and "BIP#101 mined-blocks" are two different characteristic numbers.

How many of the "normal" full-nodes are virtual servers? Have you researched that?
I don't see any problems with virtual servers. In my company every server is a virtual server. That is nothing unusual. It means, that you can scale them better for their purpose.
I've said nodes doesn't indicate mining power in every post in this thread. Thanks for the insult though.

You wrote:
Many of those could also be NotBitcoinXT nodes (Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/not-bitcoin-xt-1154520 )

Those are disguised nodes that appear as BitcoinXT but don't actually support the blocksize increase.
Which is another retarded thing in this whole discussion.
Why would anybody run a NotBitcoinXT nodes, other than to trying to hurt Bitcoin at all? Miners for sure wouldn't do that, since they are revenue oriented and it would just hurt themself to cause such a confusion.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 101
August 18, 2015, 06:09:34 AM
#7
Many of those could also be NotBitcoinXT nodes (Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/not-bitcoin-xt-1154520 )

Those are disguised nodes that appear as BitcoinXT but don't actually support the blocksize increase.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
English <-> Portuguese translations
August 18, 2015, 05:55:02 AM
#6
What after the trial period? If Bitcoin community split into two and Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin XT run on different nodes - due to this coming fork, many people may lost their Bitcoins in their wallets.

So stick for the One, and my vote is for Bitcoin Core.

That's why you are avoiding XT?
Because of bs?

I don't know if I want to slap or laught at everyone that didn't understand what is a fork.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
August 18, 2015, 05:53:05 AM
#5
What does mining have to do with full nodes?
You, again, fail to understand fundamentals of Bitcoin.

If you look at http://xtnodes.com/ you see, that "Bitcoin XT nodes" and "BIP#101 mined-blocks" are two different characteristic numbers.

How many of the "normal" full-nodes are virtual servers? Have you researched that?
I don't see any problems with virtual servers. In my company every server is a virtual server. That is nothing unusual. It means, that you can scale them better for their purpose.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
August 18, 2015, 05:50:31 AM
#4
What after the trial period? If Bitcoin community split into two and Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin XT run on different nodes - due to this coming fork, many people may lost their Bitcoins in their wallets.

How exactly is that going to happen?

Indeed, that's the opposite of what will happen. If you have 1 BTC pre-fork, then post-fork you have 1 BTC on Core + 1 BTC on XT.
legendary
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
August 18, 2015, 05:44:10 AM
#3
What after the trial period? If Bitcoin community split into two and Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin XT run on different nodes - due to this coming fork, many people may lost their Bitcoins in their wallets.

How exactly is that going to happen?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
August 18, 2015, 05:41:32 AM
#2
What after the trial period? If Bitcoin community split into two and Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin XT run on different nodes - due to this coming fork, many people may lost their Bitcoins in their wallets.

So stick for the One, and my vote is for Bitcoin Core.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
August 18, 2015, 05:28:57 AM
#1
....
Pages:
Jump to: