Bitcoin Forum>Bitcoin>Development & Technical Discussion
Pages:
Author

Topic: . - page 4. (Read 40384 times)

kano
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Re: .
June 24, 2012, 06:59:11 PM
#97
Quote from: phelix on June 24, 2012, 09:04:33 AM
Quote from: kano on June 19, 2012, 05:55:42 AM
... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.

Quote from: phelix on March 25, 2012, 04:18:19 AM
Quote from: kano on March 25, 2012, 12:49:38 AM
Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 25, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.

is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?

?
So for the average joe's wallet that might want to use this to choose transactions or addresses, it's no good since you have to have done this from the start and always remember to do it that way?

My point being that your saying that this is only of use to people who have anonymity issues, rather than also for those who wish to have control over certain transactions
i.e. going one more level is as far as is possible with selecting sources for a transaction - and why not allow that? Why stop early?
kano
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Re: .
June 24, 2012, 06:52:27 PM
#96
Quote from: phelix on June 24, 2012, 09:06:43 AM
a feature that sets the transfer amount to all coins in the selected address minus fee would be nice. currently it's a pita to empty an address.

It seems that knowing the fee in advance is beyond bitcoin.

This an issue that has been ignored or argued not possible for a VERY long time, every time it comes up, since there are some variables in the calculation that change over time I imagine is the excuse.

... what's that old timers term ... 2 phase commit ... not used much these days ...
phelix
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
Re: .
June 24, 2012, 09:06:43 AM
#95
a feature that sets the transfer amount to all coins in the selected address minus fee would be nice. currently it's a pita to empty an address.

phelix
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
Re: .
June 24, 2012, 09:04:33 AM
#94
Quote from: kano on June 19, 2012, 05:55:42 AM
... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.

Quote from: phelix on March 25, 2012, 04:18:19 AM
Quote from: kano on March 25, 2012, 12:49:38 AM
Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 25, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.

is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?

?
Luke-Jr
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Re: .
June 19, 2012, 10:21:41 AM
#93
Quote from: Ente on June 19, 2012, 04:43:48 AM
Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!
As of right now, that probably won't be happening. There's a lot of cleanup needed before it can be merged, and both coderrr and dooglus who were maintaining it seem to have lost interest. I've been rebasing it for next-test, and Diapolo is trying to clean up the GUI code, but it still needs someone to clean up the internals.
kano
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Re: .
June 19, 2012, 05:55:42 AM
#92
... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.
phelix
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
Re: .
June 19, 2012, 05:34:22 AM
#91
Quote from: Ente on June 19, 2012, 04:43:48 AM
Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 15, 2012, 01:42:09 AM
Quote from: Hawkix on May 15, 2012, 01:07:47 AM
Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.

Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!

Ente
+1
Ente
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
Re: .
June 19, 2012, 04:43:48 AM
#90
Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 15, 2012, 01:42:09 AM
Quote from: Hawkix on May 15, 2012, 01:07:47 AM
Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.

Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!

Ente
Luke-Jr
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Re: .
May 15, 2012, 01:42:09 AM
#89
Quote from: Hawkix on May 15, 2012, 01:07:47 AM
Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.
CIYAM
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
Re: .
May 15, 2012, 01:15:30 AM
#88
If the ability to specify a "change address" was also added to/included with coin control for release in the next version (i.e. 0.7.0) then I will gladly pay a bounty of 20 BTC to the author of the patch that is merged in (feel free to quote this for reference). Smiley


Cheers,

Ian.
Hawkix
hero member
Activity: 531
Merit: 505
Re: .
May 15, 2012, 01:07:47 AM
#87
Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
Luke-Jr
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Re: .
May 10, 2012, 01:50:10 PM
#86
Quote from: check_status on May 10, 2012, 12:44:56 PM
Is this still being developed?
The latest version is still included in next-test.
check_status
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician
Re: .
May 10, 2012, 12:44:56 PM
#85
Is this still being developed?
Justin00
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Re: .
April 14, 2012, 02:36:11 AM
#84
Thanks I will test her out.

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 10, 2012, 08:03:03 AM
next-test should be compatible with 0.6.0, and has Coin Control
Serenata
sr. member
Activity: 250
Merit: 250
Re: .
April 11, 2012, 05:06:54 AM
#83
It should be mentioned elsewhere but what about an "Open Wallet..." function, for us keeping many different wallets?
Luke-Jr
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Re: .
April 10, 2012, 08:03:03 AM
#82
next-test should be compatible with 0.6.0, and has Coin Control
Justin00
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Re: .
April 10, 2012, 07:02:58 AM
#81
hmm i have been using version 6.0 in win32, have a  few addresses setup and what not.
I wanted to try your version of 5.3 but it ses my wallet is not compatible.

Not sure of the best approach to get it working. I imagine I can setup addresses in 5.3 and then use 6.0 to send the coins across and start using 5.3?? dunno if there is a better approach ?

thanks Smiley
mb300sd
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
Re: .
March 25, 2012, 02:43:26 PM
#80
It would be nice to be able to sort by clicking the Address, Label, Balance, etc buttons. Should be a simple option of your using the standard controls.
phelix
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
Re: .
March 25, 2012, 04:18:19 AM
#79
Quote from: kano on March 25, 2012, 12:49:38 AM
Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 25, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.

is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?
kano
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Re: .
March 25, 2012, 12:49:38 AM
#78
Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 25, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.
Pages:
Bitcoin Forum>Bitcoin>Development & Technical Discussion
Jump to: