Pages:
Author

Topic: . - page 5. (Read 40384 times)

legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
March 25, 2012, 12:01:36 AM
#77
Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
March 20, 2012, 06:43:51 AM
#76
works for me..check if u enabled it in settings of the qt client..isn`t called anonymity anymore..something with coinxxxx..Smiley

oops, I completely forgot about that. thanks, pt!

is there any particular reason why it is not activated by default?
hero member
Activity: 484
Merit: 500
March 20, 2012, 04:51:54 AM
#75
works for me..check if u enabled it in settings of the qt client..isn`t called anonymity anymore..something with coinxxxx..Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
March 20, 2012, 04:13:55 AM
#74
If you're on WINDOWS please use the new 0.5.3.1 build which has the patch for the recent vulnerability.

https://github.com/coderrr/bitcoin/downloads

If you use a previous version on WINDOWS you are in danger of being hacked and getting your wallet stolen.

does it work for everyone else? for me the anonymity tab does not show up with this version  Cry
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 18, 2012, 11:50:58 AM
#73
Is there a branch that merges cleanly to the official git master branch?  I get merge conflicts when I try.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
March 17, 2012, 03:47:45 PM
#72
OK, got it working! Very cool patch. Quick tip for OSX users who can't get it to compile: change the makefile.osx so it looks like this:
Code:
#CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch i386 -O3 \
LDFLAGS="-arch x86_64"
CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch x86_64 -O3 \

I don't think my install of Boost works with i386.

Which function do I use to check which accounts are tied together by transactions?
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
March 17, 2012, 08:48:29 AM
#71
So isn't just going to the address level not quite enough?
e.g. shouldn't it be the transaction level for selecting inputs not just the address level?
Or does it already do that and I missed that comment somewhere?
member
Activity: 221
Merit: 10
March 16, 2012, 11:04:26 PM
#70
Amazing!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
March 16, 2012, 09:51:11 PM
#69
This is exactly what I was looking for! I'll try to get this running on OS X.

ETA:I'm a Github noob, how do I download the source?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
March 16, 2012, 08:03:16 PM
#68

any chance of a 5.3.1 binary?
donator
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
March 15, 2012, 03:39:52 PM
#67
Also, please post a donation address so I can send you some btc for this feature - it has been extremely useful!
donator
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
March 15, 2012, 03:38:51 PM
#66
Are you going to provide a patched build based off of Bitcoin 0.5.3?

many thanks

can't wait until they just merge this into the main tree!

Also, have you heard of this? From facebook group "Bitcoin P2P Cryptocurrency":

"Efforts are underway to make bitcoin transactions more anonymous.  Right now transactions are viewable using the blockchain.  However, the protocol could be changed such that an a anonymous transaction (not pseudo-anonymous) can prove it is valid by providing cryptographic proof of the validity of previous transactions.  If the developers succeed there will be no way to track bitcoins and it will be strongly anonymous."

http://wbl.github.com/bitcoinanon.pdf
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
February 17, 2012, 03:31:55 AM
#65
This is an eye opener for me and i hope it will make it into the official version.
I will follow this.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
February 17, 2012, 02:45:14 AM
#64
This is the one reason I've been looking for alternative clients. I like the idea of controlling where it sends from. If this makes into the official build, I'd be totally convinced.

Any chance of a patched OS X binary? Smiley
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
February 17, 2012, 01:27:33 AM
#63
Am i right in saying that this feature will not be supported by the official client?

I expect it to be at some point.
legendary
Activity: 1937
Merit: 1001
February 16, 2012, 01:16:46 PM
#62
Am i right in saying that this feature will not be supported by the official client?

Anyway, i thought it would be nice to have an additional feature that makes use of the new import/export keys command in 0.6rc1. If we could just rightclick the address from the anonymity tab and select export.
And a new button to import a key.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
February 13, 2012, 02:26:25 AM
#61
Being able to sort the input addresses would be nice.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 102
Bitcoin!
February 13, 2012, 02:05:50 AM
#60
Two questions--

1. On the screen where you choose the input transactions, could you display the "age" as well, so that you can easily choose older ones to avoid paying a tx fee?

2. Is this patch under any kind of consideration for inclusion in the mainline client?
donator
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
February 11, 2012, 04:25:36 PM
#59
Question -- how do I specify multiple source addresses for sending BTC?

(even though it's probably CTRL-click, for the sake of completeness...)

Settings - options - display
check that Display advanced anonymity features is ticked
click OK

There should be a new tab between address book and export




Go to Send coins and look at the bottom where it says send from:



Click anonymity



click the address you want to send from, and it will highlight in blue.
CTRL-click to add more addresses.

go to Send coins, at the bottom you will see the selected address(es). You can delete or add addresses directly here, each address separated with a ; (semi-colon)



if there is insufficient funds in the selected addresses it will error and you will need to reduce the amount or  use another tab.

CTRL-clicking all addresses is equivalent to having none selected. ie the client will use up to all of the addresses that contain balances to calculate.

Don't forget that there is a tx fee for EACH address used, not one combined fee.

marked


Awesome! Thanks.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
February 11, 2012, 10:05:43 AM
#58
Can we have this rebased against 0.6?

Thanks.

Would be nice but isn't 0.6 still RC?

Also would like the ability to see tx fees as either a separate transaction linked to the send, or as a separate column.
something the can be done through the options |display.


marked
Pages:
Jump to: