Topic:   (Read 1354 times)

Very, VERY funny right there.

You know that part about where I said, that, like, if we ever had a $100k party (that I wouldn't show up at for OpSec reasons), I would have to punch you in the face over years of animosity, because that's just the way the universe works ?

Yeah, I think I'd rather just shake your hand and walk over to the bar with you to get a drink. #nohomo

And seriously, dude. I had forgotten how wordy your posts are. You haven't changed

Let's take it step by step to reveal to the reader what sort of scumbag nutildah is and what lies he is still pushing

The reader can clearly see that nutildah can NOT be trusted. It is UNDENIABLE that he is a willing scam facilitator for pay willing even to act EVIL by his own definition for 0.3btc (at that time worth 300bucks)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52663441

He also states when trying to sell HIS OWN account that he is not interested in sig campaigns LOL  recently found protecting scams and even disputing their flags whilst they were paying him to have a sig. He is also one of the biggest losers on this forum. He was a NEM stake holder and early dash (scam) pusher. He should be rich but was RECENTLY found begging for 0.02btc loans. LOL

So that is the kind of retarded willing scam facilitator and liar you are dealing with.


Now.

1. There is UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE of whataboutBOB turning up on our thread that presented OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE of double standards being pushed by SCAMMERS to silence those that dare to reveal the DT scammers own prior financially motivated wrong doing. (NUTILDAHS PALS AND NUTILDAH ACTUALLY)
BOB turns up and does not attempt to debate those observable instances of SCAMMERS double standards. HE tries TO SUPPORT THEIR ACTIONS by claiming
a/ If you present the scammers clear double standards then that means you have been fucked in your ass too much and are likely nefarious yourself
b/ That you must accept scammers double standards or you are poking bears ?

This is clear undeniable evidence of supporting those scammers and their double standards and trying to shout down and derail any thread highlighting their actions.

UNDENIABLE - but nutildah tries to dupe you that there is no support of scammers and their actions. ALSO bob has been found before rushing in to defend scammers and tackle whistle blowers.


2. CRYPTOHUNTER likey sold his account - MORE speculation and made up bullshit WHEN NUTILDAH IS A FAMOUS SCAMMER FACILITATOR THAT TRIED TO OR SOLD HIS ACCOUNT. The nutildah password has changed more times than suchmoon has eaten cookies in the last week? OH REALLY?
How many times has the cryptohunter account changed passwords??  if it has even been changed once since it was hacked that would be something to look at.


3. The posts deleted clearly are off topic they do not address bobs trust abuse AT ALL they are derailing to speculation of cryptohunter being US which is not true and they have no conclusive proof at all because that would be impossible.  Again just a bunch of scammers and scammer supporters trying to derail the trust abusing actions of one of their supporters who LIKE NUTILDAH THE PROVEN SCAM FACILITATOR FOR PAY will use the red trust feebback for their own personal reasons. WHEN they should have clearly red trust, a flag and be removed from DT.

4. A proven willing scam facilitator for PAY and one that seeks to EDIT AND HIDE the evidence of his past is on DT? claiming honest members with ZERO instances of financially motivated wrong doing should have more red trust given by HIM lololololololo

Let us blow his tiny scam facilitating mind a little more. " nobody posting from the cryptohunter account has ever posted from the toaa account either and visa versa"  got it not account seller and scam facilitator for pay?? mr I want to delete my post history to hide the evidence haha

NUTILDAH read all about that imbecile and his double standards, willing scam facilitating for 300buck approx and then trying to delete the evidence ...oh yeah not interested in signatures either LOLOLOL

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52663441

What we have so far:

- cryptohunter, aka The-One-Above-All, has provided zero evidence that Bob has been "supporting scammers"
- cryptohunter likely sold his account:


I don't know what else there is to be taken away from that particular wording. There are many easier ways to have conveyed this information, yet they chose to convey it in a fashion which insinuates they sold their account.

Meanwhile, any time somebody presents evidence or rationale that runs contrary to cryptohunter's talking points, they delete the post, under the pretense that it violates their local rules (even if it does not).

This summation of observable instances paints a picture of clearly untrustworthy, and I daresay scam facilitating, behavior by this user. I am doubling down on my initial recommendation left on their trust wall some 8 months ago that this user be avoided at all costs.

Wow.  I did not know that you did all of the things that you proclaim to have done.  I have largely only seen non-contributory content in your posts, so far. 

Maybe I should get out more to attempt to identify such "observable and undeniable instances of financially motivated wrong doing including, scamming, extortion, scammer supporting, willing scam facilitating for pay, trust abuse and double standard" that are allegedly being shown through some of your posts?

I will watch out for it more, to see if I identify any of that within any of your posts.


 At least you have goals.  I suppose that could be a good thing if you can attempt to direct yourself(ves) on some kind of meaningful goals.  If bringing me down is your purportedly good for the forum goal, then so be it.

By the way, if you are just making up daemons, then hey, I may as well serve as one of them, no?  Gives you(s) a purpose in life and within this forum.


 Could be.  You(s) is(are) entitled to your perspective/opinion.


 Haven't we already gone over this, not that I agree with your lil rendition, but I understand that you are referring to your deletion of my post.  You are not really saying anything new, but just repeating the same thing.


 No "we" are not clear, yet.


I am not intending to post anymore there or even to read the thread, even though I do have it on my watch list.  Maybe I should remove that thread from my watch list?  There surely is not anything substantially meaningful going on in that thread, is there?  NOT with you self-moderating such contents.


 O.k.  You are starting to make some senses.   


 I am not clear, you are trying to invite me somewhere?  On a date?  I am not interested.


This part is a bit unclear, but I suppose that everyone has a perspective regarding what they are doing, and their targets.  There is some built in double standards within ordinary human discretion, so I am not sure if you are expecting people/members to be/act the same as robots?

Not sure that CH started any threads that looks like another speculation and outright pile of shit.

Moving on past that nonsense to what we can prove.

You can not accept the rules are going to apply to you like they apply to every other member fatty.

Anyway the fact most DT are claiming you can is our new entry ticket back to WO thread. They will thank you now for having us back there to chat to over and over and over again regardless of their unfair deletes ... nom nom nom.

Suchmoon invites us back to WO forever now. Thanks suchmoon.

We don't mind at all. You are wrong (like usual) suchmoron. These can be used for bumps and MORE attention. We have nothing to fear. The more attention the better. Now WO can not do shit with their unfair self modding bullshit. WO is back on the menu. We will make it very clear you want us back there and that we should be allowed to repost and repost and repost as many times as we like to get our points across.

NO RULES ABOUT IT. Read pharmacist, direwolf and all the other morons explanations if you need to. We will quote them in the Wo thread for you to read when we feel the need.

Actually the clear view that it is totally allowed and nothing against it opens a lot more doors. So no more hiding away for you. Thanks for assisting us suchmoon. Glad you took us off ignore.....oh yeah that was just bullshit and you are still hanging on our every word.

We're all off out tonight and likely tomorrow.... you know having fun , enjoying our lives. See you scumbags back here in a couple of days.  I know you would be bored without us here whipping you all into shape. (well not suchmoon obviously) haha xxx

Cryptohunter deleted a few of my posts in his self-modded thread too and this triggered him enough to start a Meta thread complaining about unspecified "DT members". As if someone forced him to create that thread or to keep deleting those posts.

So according to JJG

Presenting observable and undeniable instances of financially motivated wrong doing including, scamming, extortion, scammer supporting, willing scam facilitating for pay, trust abuse and double standards = stiring up shit and non-contributory content. AHAHAHAHAHAHAH  He sounds IDEAL for DT. hahahaahah
#

Sorry wordy wordsmith .. your waffle will be sliced away to reveal the paper thin defense which we will enjoy igniting with our flame thrower or shredding with our chain saw.

You already seem less that those low functioning no hoping self debunking fools that came before you. There is no substance just a lot of flowery waffle.

You were making no point. You posted off topic irrelevant garbage to try and derail our thread. You then claim it was not off topic because although it tackled none of the central points in the OP some other half witted idiot scammer ( the same one you tried to protect by sneakily removing his quoted post in the wo thread) went off topic so you think it is permitted flow and someone on topic to continue with his off topic derailing LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You are making no points you are clearly unable to form a credible and valid rebuttal to our points. Are we clear now??

You need to stick to specifically debating the central points in the initial post, you also need to stick by our local rules there. Got it idiot.

I don't care if you two girls had some bitch fight over who is the receiver this week and who cooks dinner next week. You sissy squabbles are nothing to "us" you are trying to derail the thread that details whataboutbobs trust abuse and girly bitchy tactics. Got it moron.

Good now stfu or bring some meat to your arguments to we can really tuck in.

We do not bond with scammer supporting bitcoin beggars who seek to push clear double standards on this board. We crush them.

Hey.  I was trying to bond with TOAA, and you are ruining the moo.  #nohomo.

You are going to scare him away (we could only wish).

Sorry to see that you don't seem to understand engwish.

Regarding that above linked thread; I see that you are quite the self-entertained drama queen.  Surprises me that you are allowed to propagate such - non-contributory content.


You are fighting for stirring shit. Seems to be your specialty.


I just came to this thread to post my deleted thread.  


This point that you are making is clear as mud to the extent that it is relevant to any possible at-issue point.  


You(s) (look I am being courteous by referrring to you(s) in the plural.... ) seem to have a tendency to kind of lump matters together, whether subject or members, so there is that.


I did not know that I needed to refute anything.  I just posted a deleted thread, and you confirmed that you deleted it.  So, the subject seems to be over.  You admitted the whole point that I was making..  Thanks for your cooperation.  You are such a nice guy(s).  




I get that you are like a broken record with unimportant points, so I have observed that instance of an observable, if that counts for anything.  

LOL sorry you do not like the rules of the forum haha

Errr well when you are clearly siding and supporting these kinds of people...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52014561

And claiming that people that are fighting for transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all members are the BAD guys I don't think you are fooling any one really.

I am suggesting you are supporting bobs clearly trust abusing actions YES.

LOL I love how you say I was only replying to some other person (who was not debating anything to do with the central points mentioned in initial post) then when we just say that is no excuse you say....oh well I don't accept your summary LOLOLOL

What are you saying then If we were getting you all wrong.

There is no substance in your answers at all with regard refuting anything we have said.

you were offtopic and didn't bring any observable instances = get it now?? LOL

Cryptohunter is incapable of engaging in honest debate, thus I am putting him on ignore permanently (and all his alts, as well).


No, you presented no evidence. You said, "here are the scammers" and presented a list of DT members which you claim to be scammers, yet you've provided no OBSERVABLE PROOF of this. Its just you doing what you do best: calling people names. Its the only thing you do.


Theymos wasn't speculating, he said "you are cryptohunter." He didn't say "you might be cryptohunter." It is not speculation. It is a statement of fact which he is in a unique position to verify. So you've just lied once again. There are other ways to verify you are cryptohunter besides IP information. Common sense is a big one, something that you are severely lacking.

The only thing I "got" is that, for the life of you, you cannot be honest. You are simply incapable of it. I don't know whether its a psychological problem, if it comes with being a troll, or if its a genuine neurobiological deficiency. Whatever it is, its rendered you incapable of telling the truth. Ergo, you are not to be trusted or taken seriously.

Despite my efforts to find a rational, decent side to you, you have once again failed to debate in good faith and as such I am now putting you on ignore permanently.


LOL, I suppose I did.