----------
At the moment I am still using 2778 HZ/USD (from 0.00000120 BTC and 300 USD) which is a very good average over time - but it is just an average, and thus introduces unnecessary inaccuracies to my analysis.
BTC price data I will for sure find in several places, but what about HZ?
Thanks to Ge Be Wolf for the hint: http://coinmarketcap.com/static/generated_pages/currencies/datapoints/next-horizon-180d.json
The first dimension of each tuple is time, with:
http://www.epochconverter.com/
"Assuming that this timestamp is in milliseconds:"
1412152752000 = GMT: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
1427655256000 = GMT: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:54:16 GMT
1427693957000 = GMT: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:39:17 GMT
The structure is the following:
market_cap_by_available_supply_data: [280]
0: {0: 1412152752000, 1: 196152.5768673741} GMT: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
279: {0: 1427693957000, 1: 127815.6416205677} GMT: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:39:17 GMT
price_btc_data: [280]
0: {0: 1412152752000, 1: 0.00000201903} GMT: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
279: {0: 1427693957000, 1: 9.64973e-7} GMT: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:39:17 GMT
price_usd_data: [280]
0: {0: 1412152752000, 1: 0.000782112} Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
279: {0: 1427693957000, 1: 0.000237479} Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:39:17 GMT
market_cap_by_total_supply_data: [280]
0: {0: 1412152752000, 1: 782112} GMT: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
279: {0: 1427693957000, 1: 237479} GMT: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:39:17 GMT
volume_data: [175]
0: {0: 1412152752000, 1: 3872.89} GMT: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 08:39:12 GMT
174: {0: 1427655256000, 1: 1002.5} GMT: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:54:16 GMT
price:
October 0.00000202 BTC/HZ and
March 0.00000096 BTC/HZ
- sounds about right.
So I have data now for the second half of the year of HZ's existence.
Most of the asset action happened since then I guess - if I don't find any other data,
then it's perhaps ok to just use an average HZ price for those first 6 months.
What is a good average BTC/HZ price for the time between genesis block, and October 1st?
THANKS!