The fact that Andrew does not refund advertisers for fraud means that it is in his interest to ban partners for fraud (he gets to pocket the whole cost of their clicks).
In essence, he is directly profiting from defrauding his advertisers.
The model is flawed inherently, the interest of the site operator should always be to maintain a fraud-free service, but with BitcoinAdvertisers this is not the case.
Topic: . - page 3. (Read 17991 times)
hey averyone, if you ask me http://bitcoinadvertisers.com is the biggest scam site ever!!
we will never get paid out - http://bitcoinadvertisers.com/partnerstat.php?p=1Jmq5ZmotK5y3KSKRNxx9k67EdiDccmd1G
so everyone out there, do NOT use this site !
we will never get paid out - http://bitcoinadvertisers.com/partnerstat.php?p=1Jmq5ZmotK5y3KSKRNxx9k67EdiDccmd1G
so everyone out there, do NOT use this site !
confirmed: total scam
THIS WEB DOES NOT PAY
i removed the banners of my web already,
the owner does not deceive just the user, keeping his account generating traffic without paying and without any notice, but also deceive the guys who bought his service, as the traffic generated and not paid, will be deduced from the traffic the advertiser paid for!
overall a quite round business! full incoming bitcoins and zero outcoming ones.
"turn your website into a money making monster" ?!? BS.
THIS WEB DOES NOT PAY
i removed the banners of my web already,
the owner does not deceive just the user, keeping his account generating traffic without paying and without any notice, but also deceive the guys who bought his service, as the traffic generated and not paid, will be deduced from the traffic the advertiser paid for!
overall a quite round business! full incoming bitcoins and zero outcoming ones.
"turn your website into a money making monster" ?!? BS.
Again I'm left wondering how this can just be okay to do...
because bitcoin.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
Again I'm left wondering how this can just be okay to do...
because bitcoin.
Scammer gonna scam, scammed gonna stay scammed.
Case filed.
PS: For every scammer out there, just ignore when you're being accused and you'll not be considered a scammer
Case filed.
PS: For every scammer out there, just ignore when you're being accused and you'll not be considered a scammer
Exactly, man.
I learned my goddam lesson now
Never admit to ANYTHING at all and you get scot free.
Valuable fife lesson right there folks.
Works every damn time !
Same problem! This is my thread about it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinadvertiserscom-wont-pay-me-87567
You should start searching before using a service. Many people have been scammed and there are plenty complaints on this forum.
Same problem! This is my thread about it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinadvertiserscom-wont-pay-me-87567
Great! I'm so glad that progress is being made to resolve this.
This has been going on for so long, I forgot which horse I had in this race.
Great! I'm so glad that progress is being made to resolve this.
This has been going on for so long, I forgot which horse I had in this race.
As it stands i would say stealing someones earned balance is indeed a scam.
Well if you agree to the terms and they say your account can be closed at any time then yes it would stand up in court.Still haven't received my payment, btw. But as I put the ads on my lowest traffic site, it didn't get any new click yet. Although, I wonder what can be so hard in programming a cron payment...
Well if you agree to the terms and they say your account can be closed at any time then yes it would stand up in court.
Nope. In the ToS you can write everything, even for example that with the click of "I agree" button user gives away his house for free in website's owner favor. Of course it will never be upheld in the court. 
Can anyone figure out which term they broke?
Are all users of the site breaking the same term?
Would it stand up in court?
---
As it stands i would say stealing someones earned balance is indeed a scam.
Are all users of the site breaking the same term?
Would it stand up in court?
---
As it stands i would say stealing someones earned balance is indeed a scam.
Well if you agree to the terms and they say your account can be closed at any time then yes it would stand up in court.
Not necessarily. Many judges take a "common sense" approach to these kind of things. Just because the terms may technically allow something doesn't negate the rest of the contract.
Can anyone figure out which term they broke?
Are all users of the site breaking the same term?
Would it stand up in court?
---
As it stands i would say stealing someones earned balance is indeed a scam.
Are all users of the site breaking the same term?
Would it stand up in court?
---
As it stands i would say stealing someones earned balance is indeed a scam.
Well if you agree to the terms and they say your account can be closed at any time then yes it would stand up in court.
Sorry, to clarify I meant that we have a policy to not discuss specific TOS disputes in public, for the cases that have already been aired in public I'm not making any further comment.
You also do not discuss in private. You just ignore.
This guy clearly deserves a scammer tag.
So many people complaining ...
Have you learned your lesson? its only scamming if you didn't say "i will do whatever i want and if you complain i will do whatever i want anyway" before the deal.
I have indeed learned my lesson. Have a slick TOS that allows me to take all the BTC and not give anything in return
Any corrupt lawyer taking BTC here up for the challenge ? Make it small print too !
Sorry, to clarify I meant that we have a policy to not discuss specific TOS disputes in public, for the cases that have already been aired in public I'm not making any further comment.
You also do not discuss in private. You just ignore.
This guy clearly deserves a scammer tag.
So many people complaining ...
Have you learned your lesson? its only scamming if you didn't say "i will do whatever i want and if you complain i will do whatever i want anyway" before the deal.
Sorry, to clarify I meant that we have a policy to not discuss specific TOS disputes in public, for the cases that have already been aired in public I'm not making any further comment.
You also do not discuss in private. You just ignore.
This guy clearly deserves a scammer tag.
So many people complaining ...
Jump to: