Ah, there it it. Thanks.
OK, we'll see...
Topic: [0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining| - page 114. (Read 398185 times)
May 16, 2012, 11:48:54 AM
May 16, 2012, 11:43:49 AM
Oh wait, it was turned off? I don't see the option anymore (sure I saw it the other day!).
I don't know then, I only started mining here full-time yesterday. Previously was a back-up pool.
I don't know then, I only started mining here full-time yesterday. Previously was a back-up pool.
Go to Worker, on the left side of the screen then select edit and it is the first check box under comment. Uncheck it and see if that helps. It helped on mine but I didn't pay attention as to how much.
Sam
May 16, 2012, 11:38:54 AM
Oh wait, it was turned off? I don't see the option anymore (sure I saw it the other day!).
I don't know then, I only started mining here full-time yesterday. Previously was a back-up pool.
I don't know then, I only started mining here full-time yesterday. Previously was a back-up pool.
May 16, 2012, 11:35:46 AM
I'll try...
May 16, 2012, 11:34:49 AM
Seem to be getting a reject rate of 1.2-1.4%
What are others getting?
As a comparison, on EMC I get 0.6-0.7%.
I have 4 BFLs on CGminer with load balancing between Ozcoin and EMC pool.
What are others getting?
As a comparison, on EMC I get 0.6-0.7%.
I have 4 BFLs on CGminer with load balancing between Ozcoin and EMC pool.
Did turning off the Namecoin Long Polls help?
Sam
May 16, 2012, 11:24:27 AM
Seem to be getting a reject rate of 1.2-1.4%
What are others getting?
As a comparison, on EMC I get 0.6-0.7%.
I have 4 BFLs on CGminer with load balancing between Ozcoin and EMC pool.
What are others getting?
As a comparison, on EMC I get 0.6-0.7%.
I have 4 BFLs on CGminer with load balancing between Ozcoin and EMC pool.
May 16, 2012, 07:27:06 AM
I've got an update guys.Things will be resolved in the next update of Avast. 
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Good news
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Cheers film2240
You're welcome Graet
Finally got Avast to do something.Woo hoo.
May 16, 2012, 07:15:19 AM
I've got an update guys.Things will be resolved in the next update of Avast.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Good newsUploaded with ImageShack.us
Cheers film2240
May 16, 2012, 06:24:32 AM
I've got an update guys.Things will be resolved in the next update of Avast.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
May 15, 2012, 11:49:52 AM
I've sent a reply to Avast now through their ticket system:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
Thanks film2240 - user support in these situations is invaluable
You're welcome Graet.
Sometimes people/companies just need a gentle prod to get things going. May 15, 2012, 11:45:47 AM
I've sent a reply to Avast now through their ticket system:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
Thanks film2240 - user support in these situations is invaluable
May 15, 2012, 10:59:31 AM
I've sent a reply to Avast now through their ticket system:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Oops.Looks like some typos got in before I sent it.
More evidence of Avast's shortcomings: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23428578-False-positive-in-
May 15, 2012, 10:57:14 AM
You should probably Twitter it as well.
yep did 1stfacebook post seems....missing now.... lol
If only they responded to the polite email I sent them I could help them understand their fail
um, that an api key found in a 5month old google search does not not a virus make
May 15, 2012, 10:36:35 AM
You should probably Twitter it as well.
Oh, the way's company's have at their disposal to ignore their customers is mind boggling.
Sam
May 15, 2012, 10:32:03 AM
You should probably Twitter it as well.
May 15, 2012, 10:29:28 AM
https://www.facebook.com/avast
as there is still no response to my email to avast, I posted to their facebook
as there is still no response to my email to avast, I posted to their facebook
May 15, 2012, 10:09:47 AM
Yeah.That's sticking it to Avast.
Just watched the family guy episode where everyone gets rid of govt.Very funny episode.
Just watched the family guy episode where everyone gets rid of govt.Very funny episode.
May 15, 2012, 10:03:01 AM
May 15, 2012, 08:43:51 AM
Fail from Avast on an epic scale. They are referencing a google search that points to systems other than their own as "proof", and those external systems fail because they think the URI indicates a virus, when it is only an API key.
Like API keys can be viruses.lol.Time to give avast my middle finger for failing me as a user.I switch off their network and web shields as they both cause grief and stop miner connections to ozco.in port 8332. If avast has the balls to come here and explain,then that'd help us. 
May 15, 2012, 08:40:31 AM
Fail from Avast on an epic scale. They are referencing a google search that points to systems other than their own as "proof", and those external systems fail because they think the URI indicates a virus, when it is only an API key.
Jump to: