Jetwin upgraded to B-
Jetwin's opening rating was a "D". The reason for the low rating was in large part due to their rules. Their rules state that they can confiscate player's funds for a multitude of reasons. While many post up books state similar rules, the bad books will use those rules. The good books never use confiscation rules for syndicate and steam plays. They ban the player but all winnings are paid. Jetwin seems to be using their rules as a scarecrow tactic.
Why do they get into the B's so fast? Books need to earn the respect here not just an ease of access if u want them to respect or if u want anyone to take u serious Peeps. Going from a D to a B overnite is overboard. Some people will count on these ratings Peeps and I have also sent over people from other forums to look at these ratings, if things go wrong then this will be taken as a joke. I hope u understand what I'm trying to get at an A book really needs to be an A and people need to know that they are safe. Consider this when rating, we need things to get bigger and better, people are already scared. I wish more books with history would use bitcoins.
What you say is valid and in almost all other circumstances a book will not be raised two grades.
My thought process was that Jetwin should have been a B- book but that their rules granted them free reign to confiscate funds. My thinking now is that the rules are just stock rules used by other books that aren't intended to be used. I feel that my original grade was much too low.
I also like what Jetwin is doing with risk management where I'm secure on their plans to pay players. Some of these 3x rollover books scare me. This is the reason that Stakebet opened at a "D" and I stated the only reason they were a "D" is that they haven't had a slow pay yet.
The only thing keeping StakeBTC from being a "F", because of that bonus, is that they haven't had one complaint as far as payouts. StakeBTC opens at "D".
I do appreciate the feedback and if you and others feel that Jetwin should have a lower grade, then the grade will be lowered.
Agree with Legions.
Peeps - "I also like what Jetwin is doing with risk management where I'm secure on their plans to pay players."
You are secure on their plans to pay players.
Even though they have numerous onerous terms in their T & C and the most ridiculous bonus rollover terms in the history of sportsbooks, you asked them and they told you that all of those terms will be ignored and they will not steal from players.
There are numerous sportsbooks out there, and none of them feel a need to post all of the justifications for possible future theft that Jetwin has in its T&C.
But you asked them, and they told you the only thing they could tell you, "Oh we're really good guys and we were just funning" and you believe this and move them up 2 ranks, after they're in existence a few weeks.
You take the word of complete strangers at face value, as if this came from the management of the Greek or Pinnacle, and not from anonymous people on a bitcoin forum, in a sub-culture where there have already been numerous stiffings and problems.
Legions - "Books need to earn the respect here not just an ease of access if u want them to respect or if u want anyone to take u serious Peeps."
Peeps - "My thought process..."
Here's where you get into trouble.