Topic: #1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus - page 12. (Read 259989 times)

Thanks, I didn't even notice that. I'll go take a look at the thread you linked. I did a copy/paste every time I listed other sources which is why they were all like that.

I created a discussion about it in Meta, here > Non clickable link in original post but clickable when quoted.
Faisal2202 rightly noticed that you placed two empty spaces between the text, Licences by Mahdirakib and the link. If you go back and edit the post and remove one empty space, the link should turn into a hyperlink without the need to add the hyperlink code like you did in post #1. If you are interested, you can follow the rest of the discussions in Meta because it's off-topic here.

Normally when I type in a URL here it's an automatic hyperlink. On page 1 and in the last post of Mahdiralkib's post I used BCT hyperlink up top and then typed in the URL in the middle. Only on Mahdiralkib's link do I have to use the hyperlink up top.

What did you do to fix it? The link in your post on page 204 for Mahdirakib's thread is still not clickable. It's a weird issue and I can't remember having come across it earlier; maybe I have but didn't pay attention to it.
I will write about it in Meta. Maybe someone knows what's the reason for it.   

I fixed the link problem on page 1. Your thread is another great source. Keep an eye on Curacao books since licensing rules are changing. They are going away from the 4 master license system and now each book will need it's own license, no more sub-licenses.

Licences by Mahdirakib  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/information-of-crypto-casinos-license-and-kyc-requirements-5381143

Withdrawal fees by Pmalek https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/table-withdrawal-fees-and-withdrawal-amounts-on-crypto-casinos-5333602

On another note for all, feel free to post about any upcoming NFL promos or contests. The season starts in a little more than one week.

I'm wondering what is the issue here. It works as a link when we put it in the quote. But it doesn't work as a link when the post is made.

Yep, we shouldn't judge a casino by the post quality of the signature participants. Stake main goal is to get more visibility in the forum. They are already very popular in the crypto gambling world with a lot of players. BTW, Stake has also hired some reputable forum members (maybe privately) to wear their signature.

I agree and definitely don't consider advertising when ranking a book. Stake's still one of the top books. My only concern with them is their KYC policy. I don't think there's anything nefarious with their KYC policies but their KYC checks have to be done much faster. A few more long holds will lead to a drop.

Yeah, that's a problem you can see with low-quality members irrespective of which campaign they participate in if there is no proper quality control. As you know, Stake has a big budget for advertising, and it seems like visibility has priority over quality. Despite that, the quality (or lack of it) of a signature campaign can't be used to assess the quality of said casino. Not many people that I know have had issues with Stake.   

That’s interesting to know and I didn’t realize it but now it makes sense. In many of the Stake threads, posters with Stake signatures keep repeating what another Stake person just said.

I wouldn't pay that much attention to advertisement and signature campaigns when determining the quality of a casino or a sportsbook. Besides, I don't like the way Stake and their people run the signature campaign on Bitcointalk. Anyone who spends a lot of time on this forum and knows its most quality members will realize that none of them are in Stake's campaign. A more professional campaign manager would have enabled better weekly pay rates and attention to quality and not quantity of posts like it is now.

jeremy, look at 5 sportsbooks at once. You will never find a line where Sportsbet is the best. That's been my experience since I line shop. Nothing is misleading. Feel free to post your reasons for Sportsbet so both sides can be seen. I don't want to just post negatively about Sportsbet.


I'll post this again as some reasons for an "A" rating.

Nitrobetting
1. Sports bonus. Most casinos only have bonuses for casinos.
2. Sports rebate for the NFL.
3. Poker
4. Horse racing, harness and greyhound.
5. No KYC if you don't use a VPN.
6. Great odds.
7. All sportsbook rating sites with a presence at bitcointalk such as cryptogamingrevu and 100bookies have Nitrobetting 1 or 2. The same with threads by posters although old. Listed as "other sources" first page.
8. Rebates for horse racing.
9. Games that don't exist at other books such as Survivor Pools.
10. No scam accusations in all of 2023.
11. The oldest sportsbook still in business.

Betcoin
1. Betcoin is the safest book out of all because they agree to third party arbitration and let the player pick the arbiter.
2. No KYC if you aren't using a VPN. Whenever they have done KYC they agree to arbitration and have won every case.
3. Two books in one.
4. The most modern book of all. They have the legacy version for those that like things simple. Then there is the new version with all the bells and whistles.
5. Social gaming with PBR coin.
6. Sports jackpot worth over $25k now USD.
7. All sportsbook rating sites with a presence at bitcointalk such as cryptogamingrevu and 100bookies have Betcoin 1 or 2. The same with threads by posters although old. Listed as "other sources" first page. The same can be said about the other "A" book Nitrobetting.
8. They are consistently improving with site updates. They just added a new addition https://new.betcoin.ag/.
9. They have horse racing, harness and greyhound.

Ok, but you literally just said


Which as I have now proven, again, is 100% false and misleading.

There are no inaccuracies. I definitely wouldn't use Nitrobetting in some markets. I wouldn't use Sportsbet in any market. You will never find the best line. Look at more books.

What about FIBA Basketball World Cup?
Look at all that wasted juice and inflated moneylines on Nicrobetting.  
This is the last I will point out your blatant inaccuracies as clearly you have an agenda.




Odds were captured at the exact same time

My statement is accurate. You will never find the best line on either side at Sportsbet. That's if you look at all the crypto books. To clarify, it's impossible to beat Sportsbet long term because of the vanilla lines and margins. You can beat both Nitrobetting and Betcoin. Give yourself a chance to win money.

I'm just quoting what you said which, again, is 100% not true.
You can play on your words all you want as it is your thread.
But you are not doing this community any service with your vagueness and inaccurate statements.