11 hours!!
99.45 % and 12 plus hours
Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff] - page 115. (Read 837122 times)
November 30, 2013, 05:47:08 AM
November 30, 2013, 04:43:17 AM
11 hours!!
November 29, 2013, 01:17:53 PM
New record: over 11 000 people mining at Bitminter simultaneously !
November 29, 2013, 03:25:48 AM
I think a namecoin being worth more than 1% of a bitcoin is a strangely high price.
But I also think most other alt coins being valued above zero is even stranger. I guess it will take a few years for people to realize that the value of a bitcoin clone, with no new features that matter, is zero, and for most of the 500 alt coins to die out. Forking a project on github doesn't make you a developer, nor does it instantly create millions of USD value. You have to do the work and create something useful. Which namecoin has done. Let's hope the new namecoin developers can fix bugs and push things forward.
But I also think most other alt coins being valued above zero is even stranger. I guess it will take a few years for people to realize that the value of a bitcoin clone, with no new features that matter, is zero, and for most of the 500 alt coins to die out. Forking a project on github doesn't make you a developer, nor does it instantly create millions of USD value. You have to do the work and create something useful. Which namecoin has done. Let's hope the new namecoin developers can fix bugs and push things forward.
November 29, 2013, 02:36:11 AM
Personal question for Doc; are you a namecoin kabillionaire now? Back in the day when the pool was still free and without donation option, I remember many of us donated most or all mined namecoins, they were almost worthless anyway and I even questioned the wisdom of bothering with merged mining. Since then, as we hoped, BTC rate has gone through the roof but namecoins doing even better and now selling for $10 each is something I would never have believed. I can get my head around $1000 per BTC, even $100K one day. I still cant get my head around namecoins being worth more than almost nothing 
.
Anyway, did you have the foresight (or plain luck) to sit on them, or did you sell/trade most of them?
.Anyway, did you have the foresight (or plain luck) to sit on them, or did you sell/trade most of them?
November 29, 2013, 01:42:23 AM
Problem solved? I see a new non-stale namecoin block.
Yeah, finally working again.
looks like corrupted nameindex.dat, need to stop daemon, delete it and wait while it's recreated (may take a while, but faster than downloading the whole chain).
Might not be, but worth a try
Might not be, but worth a try
That did it. Thanks, snailbrain.
I guess it will be hard for namecoin devs to track down this issue. It might happen twice a year on a busy pool.
Maybe I can automate detection and recovery from this. But it's not the easiest failure to detect.
Anyway, issue worked around for now, namecoins being minted again.
November 28, 2013, 11:28:44 PM
Are you using the namecoin main branch from github yet, or is it the old version? I'm about to push the updated namecoind to all my other servers (only running on 2 of 6 pool servers at the moment). I'll take a peek at my logs to see if there's been any noticeable jump in stales for Guild since updating 1/3 the pool to the latest namecoin hardfork version.
I am using the updated version of the original namecoind. It's not related to the update. I've seen this happen a couple times before. Seems to happen about once or twice per year. Usually namecoin was in an abandoned state with no developers, but now it has some, maybe they can figure it out. I sent them some info.
What happens is that namecoind gets into a broken state and I get this in its debug.log at apparently random intervals:
Code:
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
Here is one block being created. It seems to be propagating to other nodes, but for some reason they don't consider it part of the chain.
Code:
SetBestChain: new best=749f8868705d1c3d8313 height=148257 work=14693287269252460633786
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
ThreadRPCServer method=getblockcount
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
sending: inv (37 bytes) <-- Repeats many times
received: getdata (37 bytes)
received getdata for: block 749f8868705d1c3d8313
sending: block (12655 bytes)
^- repeats the 3 above many times
Could it be related to broken transactions? Maybe my node is creating blocks with invalid transactions and accepting those blocks, while other nodes reject them. At least that is my first guess.
looks like corrupted nameindex.dat, need to stop daemon, delete it and wait while it's recreated (may take a while, but faster than downloading the whole chain).
Might not be, but worth a try
November 28, 2013, 04:49:58 PM
Are you using the namecoin main branch from github yet, or is it the old version? I'm about to push the updated namecoind to all my other servers (only running on 2 of 6 pool servers at the moment). I'll take a peek at my logs to see if there's been any noticeable jump in stales for Guild since updating 1/3 the pool to the latest namecoin hardfork version.
I am using the updated version of the original namecoind. It's not related to the update. I've seen this happen a couple times before. Seems to happen about once or twice per year. Usually namecoin was in an abandoned state with no developers, but now it has some, maybe they can figure it out. I sent them some info.
What happens is that namecoind gets into a broken state and I get this in its debug.log at apparently random intervals:
Code:
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
Here is one block being created. It seems to be propagating to other nodes, but for some reason they don't consider it part of the chain.
Code:
SetBestChain: new best=749f8868705d1c3d8313 height=148257 work=14693287269252460633786
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
ThreadRPCServer method=getblockcount
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
ERROR: ConnectInputsHook() : name_update on an expired name, or there is a pending transaction on the name
sending: inv (37 bytes) <-- Repeats many times
received: getdata (37 bytes)
received getdata for: block 749f8868705d1c3d8313
sending: block (12655 bytes)
^- repeats the 3 above many times
Could it be related to broken transactions? Maybe my node is creating blocks with invalid transactions and accepting those blocks, while other nodes reject them. At least that is my first guess.
November 28, 2013, 04:06:21 PM
10 stale namecoin blocks in a row. Is that normal?
No. It appears to be caused by bugs in the Namecoin software. I'll see if there are any active Namecoin developers.
Are you using the namecoin main branch from github yet, or is it the old version? I'm about to push the updated namecoind to all my other servers (only running on 2 of 6 pool servers at the moment). I'll take a peek at my logs to see if there's been any noticeable jump in stales for Guild since updating 1/3 the pool to the latest namecoin hardfork version.
November 28, 2013, 03:45:02 PM
One more stale... indeed very strange.
November 28, 2013, 03:32:33 PM
10 stale namecoin blocks in a row. Is that normal?
No. It appears to be caused by bugs in the Namecoin software. I'll see if there are any active Namecoin developers.
November 27, 2013, 09:47:44 PM
Ok, so I finally took a look at this and I have no idea how in the hell to run it. I was hoping for some sort of exe or soemthing. Guess I'm stuck with my rPi and the bitminter client, dont get me wrong... they both work great. I was just hopingg to try something different using an old laptop with my powered hub attached to it.
Simple. Just install Ubuntu and download the built cgminer binary. Make sure you follow the ASIC-README to setup the USB permissions properly. November 27, 2013, 09:28:54 PM
Speakin of options other than the client... I want to try using CG miner on a laptop I'm refurbishing and use it for nothing but mining. That said, is there a standalone version of CGMiner that can run on a computer and not say merged with MinePeon which I also use on my rPi.
If so can someone please link me to it because I tried lookingg on github but I came accross a bunch of stuff I did not undertand.
Ty.
If so can someone please link me to it because I tried lookingg on github but I came accross a bunch of stuff I did not undertand.
Ty.
Have you seen on this : https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer or this http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer
November 27, 2013, 04:51:56 PM
This is using two Butterfly labs rigs and nothing was changed. It just out of no where started producing stale and hasn't stopped.
Did you try restarting the mining client? Or powercycling the BFL rigs? Or rebooting the host computer?
Tried all of them. Even left everything down and off for 2 hours, before rebooting
November 27, 2013, 04:45:34 PM
woohoo 16 hour block finally done... give that pool some syrup of figs or something.
November 27, 2013, 02:36:08 PM
Speakin of options other than the client... I want to try using CG miner on a laptop I'm refurbishing and use it for nothing but mining. That said, is there a standalone version of CGMiner that can run on a computer and not say merged with MinePeon which I also use on my rPi.
If so can someone please link me to it because I tried lookingg on github but I came accross a bunch of stuff I did not undertand.
Ty.
If so can someone please link me to it because I tried lookingg on github but I came accross a bunch of stuff I did not undertand.
Ty.
Have you seen on this : https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer or this http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer
November 27, 2013, 01:33:02 PM
This is using two Butterfly labs rigs and nothing was changed. It just out of no where started producing stale and hasn't stopped.
Did you try restarting the mining client? Or powercycling the BFL rigs? Or rebooting the host computer?
November 27, 2013, 01:09:33 PM
Bitminter was running for me for over a month and over the last 24 hours all it produces is stale work at 90Ghps... any thoughts?
Is this on a graphics card? Did you change the driver?
This is using two Butterfly labs rigs and nothing was changed. It just out of no where started producing stale and hasn't stopped.
November 27, 2013, 11:26:09 AM
Bitminter was running for me for over a month and over the last 24 hours all it produces is stale work at 90Ghps... any thoughts?
Is this on a graphics card? Did you change the driver?
November 27, 2013, 10:10:07 AM
Bitminter was running for me for over a month and over the last 24 hours all it produces is stale work at 90Ghps... any thoughts?
Jump to: