Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 149. (Read 499709 times)
January 22, 2012, 04:16:29 PM
Yeah, forgot to mention (d'oh) that I was back and mining within a few mins or so. Sorry for the hassle.
January 22, 2012, 04:16:02 PM
The stale /reject count was tracking fine for me after a reset but is now off - reporting about 50% of the rejects showing in CGminer.
Even with my higher reported rejects we are still under 1% -- about 0.85% after 3 1/2 hours on US2.*
Even with my higher reported rejects we are still under 1% -- about 0.85% after 3 1/2 hours on US2.*
January 22, 2012, 04:10:16 PM
That might have been about when I reset one of the servers ... but I thought it was a bit longer. In either case, it shouldn't have been down for more than a few seconds and both servers (us1 and us2) are up and taking requests right now.
I did make a DNS change, but it was just to add us1 to the dns table, I did not remove or change any existing records.
I did make a DNS change, but it was just to add us1 to the dns table, I did not remove or change any existing records.
January 22, 2012, 04:05:40 PM
Must be my connection then, cards went on backup server. Approx half an hour ago.
January 22, 2012, 04:03:55 PM
Not for awhile now (an hour at least) - why?
January 22, 2012, 03:39:57 PM
Did you just do something with the pools?
January 22, 2012, 03:14:27 PM
No, the My Workers page stales is not calculating right. I wanted to get the stales under control before I looked into what was going on as far as why it's not calculating right.
In addition to that, when I restart the server, your client counts all the rejects and the server doesn't, so you'll get less listed on the server vs what's listed on your client.
And lastly - I think most clients increment the reject counter for any reason - the server only increments the counter for actual stales. So unknown, duplicate, etc... does not get counted.
In addition to that, when I restart the server, your client counts all the rejects and the server doesn't, so you'll get less listed on the server vs what's listed on your client.
And lastly - I think most clients increment the reject counter for any reason - the server only increments the counter for actual stales. So unknown, duplicate, etc... does not get counted.
January 22, 2012, 03:11:01 PM
Sorry, US1 and US are synonymous at the moment. US2 is the only new hostname available.
I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?
I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?
I'll ask what that error means in the Phoenix miner thread.
Since my reset, I have about 8000 shares with a reject rate of 0.91%. The My Workers page shows 0.42% stales.
What causes the My Workers page to report less stales/rejects? Could it be a bad calculation on my end that is rejected before it is send back to the pool server to be verified?
edit: By the way, the reject rate is half what is was compared to the past few days. Nice work.
January 22, 2012, 01:56:43 PM
Sorry, US1 and US are synonymous at the moment. US2 is the only new hostname available.
I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?
I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?
January 22, 2012, 01:49:15 PM
Ok... I made some changes to US2. Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.
Um, is "US1" a nickname for us.eclipsemc.com or is it part of a new domain name? If the latter it's new enough that my DNS doesn't resolve it.
Separately...
After typing that question, I went to the web site to check. The only place I see a server domain name there is in two FAQ questions referring to specific mining software; the answers are command lines which include "us.eclipsemc.com:8337". I know there's pool domain info in the OP here; mightn't it be good to have basic info on the home page of the pool web site?
January 22, 2012, 01:03:18 PM
Ok... I made some changes to US2. Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.
I just reset my workers on US2, and I'll report back later.
Update: On the rejects I'm getting in Phoenix, I'm getting this error "TypeError in RPC sendResult callback." It's only been a few minutes. So, my reject rate isn't meaningful at this point.
January 22, 2012, 12:38:38 PM
Will jump on us2 and advise...
UPDATE - 0.2% after 30 minutes across 3 miners -- best I've seen in my couple days here...
UPDATE 2 - .017% after 60 minutes
UPDATE - 0.2% after 30 minutes across 3 miners -- best I've seen in my couple days here...
UPDATE 2 - .017% after 60 minutes
January 22, 2012, 11:49:17 AM
Ok... I made some changes to US2. Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.
January 22, 2012, 11:21:27 AM
Ah, yeah... that's right. LP was having problems on all severs.
I am going to disable port 9009 at some point, so switch over to port 8337 on either US1 or US2 as soon as possible. US2 will be replacing 9009, and I may add a third server, depending how things work out. All severs will be on 8337 though.
I am going to disable port 9009 at some point, so switch over to port 8337 on either US1 or US2 as soon as possible. US2 will be replacing 9009, and I may add a third server, depending how things work out. All severs will be on 8337 though.
January 22, 2012, 11:11:35 AM
Yes, there was a problem with LP on US2. This change should also address that.
Proofer's output shows us (not us2), and I was also on us, but at 8337.EDIT: Clearly my fingers were tangled up when I tried to type "Proofer" (fixed).
January 22, 2012, 10:07:32 AM
I am going to be making some changes later today that should help with the problem. I will have to bring US2 down for a brief period of time to make the switch. Probably won't be a for a few hours yet.
Yes, there was a problem with LP on US2. This change should also address that.
Yes, there was a problem with LP on US2. This change should also address that.
January 22, 2012, 08:43:52 AM
cgminer version 2.1.2 - Started: [2012-01-21 20:10:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
This happened to me too, quite possibly at the same time, but my connected line indicated I was connected with LP. LP problem?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
I omitted the "LP" part of the line but it was there; sorry for the confusion. Not quoted were many other instances of rejections of lesser number -- 2 to 12 -- preceding a "New block detected".
January 22, 2012, 06:09:10 AM
cgminer version 2.1.2 - Started: [2012-01-21 20:10:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
This happened to me too, quite possibly at the same time, but my connected line indicated I was connected with LP. LP problem? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
Code:
[2012-01-21 20:52:01] Accepted 00000000.17b8643c.12ab092b GPU 3 thread 3 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:04] Rejected 00000000.81bcbb88.7355e585 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.1ba415a5.c6cf9de6 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.146d4aa8.ad6da923 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.4d9b5a18.5cd36cbb GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:07] Rejected 00000000.ea38dd8e.0e5615f7 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.6b7ca07e.2958207f GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.d8acb32f.ce7cc697 GPU 5 thread 11 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:10] Rejected 00000000.2f222707.1ce7a6e1 GPU 2 thread 2 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:11] Rejected 00000000.ffcee7b5.fc09caa7 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:13] Rejected 00000000.316304f5.c4489c52 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.0f95e848.02301d77 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.1ef6fd64.d82cb77e GPU 0 thread 6 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.66137bdb.7bd5782d GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.14f62233.a2a4bace GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.0dbd70e7.79156fd9 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:18] Rejected 00000000.7f3c4f52.9a10195a GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:19] Rejected 00000000.c7822d9f.7693234d GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:22] Rejected 00000000.4cb30895.5772a449 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:23] Rejected 00000000.c2d95a8b.94714269 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:26] Rejected 00000000.80321797.a988cd73 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:31] Rejected 00000000.0924cd0f.d040acef GPU 1 thread 7 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:34] New block detected on network before longpoll, waiting on fresh work
[2012-01-21 20:52:35] Accepted 00000000.40349dda.0911c766 GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
January 22, 2012, 02:19:55 AM
cgminer version 2.1.2 - Started: [2012-01-21 20:10:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538 A:1247 R:49 HW:0 E:232% U:28.40/m
TQ: 12 ST: 12 SS: 0 DW: 13 NB: 5 LW: 3477 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
Code:
[2012-01-21 20:52:01] Accepted 00000000.17b8643c.12ab092b GPU 3 thread 3 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:04] Rejected 00000000.81bcbb88.7355e585 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.1ba415a5.c6cf9de6 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.146d4aa8.ad6da923 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.4d9b5a18.5cd36cbb GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:07] Rejected 00000000.ea38dd8e.0e5615f7 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.6b7ca07e.2958207f GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.d8acb32f.ce7cc697 GPU 5 thread 11 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:10] Rejected 00000000.2f222707.1ce7a6e1 GPU 2 thread 2 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:11] Rejected 00000000.ffcee7b5.fc09caa7 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:13] Rejected 00000000.316304f5.c4489c52 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.0f95e848.02301d77 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.1ef6fd64.d82cb77e GPU 0 thread 6 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.66137bdb.7bd5782d GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.14f62233.a2a4bace GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.0dbd70e7.79156fd9 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:18] Rejected 00000000.7f3c4f52.9a10195a GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:19] Rejected 00000000.c7822d9f.7693234d GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:22] Rejected 00000000.4cb30895.5772a449 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:23] Rejected 00000000.c2d95a8b.94714269 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:26] Rejected 00000000.80321797.a988cd73 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:31] Rejected 00000000.0924cd0f.d040acef GPU 1 thread 7 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:34] New block detected on network before longpoll, waiting on fresh wo
rk
[2012-01-21 20:52:35] Accepted 00000000.40349dda.0911c766 GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
My rejects was gone... :-/
January 22, 2012, 02:16:40 AM
YEE!! two sequential blocks found!!
Jump to: