I'm not sure I'm following that math, PoulGrym, are you saying you'd need 5 GH/s at a minimum before it's more profitable to do score or proportional?
Has nothing to do with hashing capacity, completely depends on the duration to find the block. And PoulGrym, on average, you should get better than PPS because the fees are less. I hope I didn't misunderstand.. 
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 212. (Read 499484 times)
July 17, 2011, 07:57:35 PM
July 17, 2011, 07:34:47 PM
id f c b r los lastscore totalscore
ID: 20 (136732) f: -0.0000100001000010 c: 0.00001000 b: 50 r: 0.0620144702512582 los: 2.7492200585903626 LSCORE: 119698.0359454643039498 TSCORE: 2053619.6124915198888630
This is for block 20.
I'm not sure I'm following that math, PoulGrym, are you saying you'd need 5 GH/s at a minimum before it's more profitable to do score or proportional?
ID: 20 (136732) f: -0.0000100001000010 c: 0.00001000 b: 50 r: 0.0620144702512582 los: 2.7492200585903626 LSCORE: 119698.0359454643039498 TSCORE: 2053619.6124915198888630
This is for block 20.
I'm not sure I'm following that math, PoulGrym, are you saying you'd need 5 GH/s at a minimum before it's more profitable to do score or proportional?
July 17, 2011, 06:50:35 PM
How high MHash does one need to make better profit then PPS?
Est. Reward: 0.28700100 / PPS 0.00002877132165184 (10% Fee) = Shares submitted 9975 Before it's lower then PPS value, My Valid shares 11079 Value Per Share ~0.00002590132165184 (~18.97% Fee)
1 d 20:39:07 = 44h 39min = 160740 sec / Shares (11079) = 14.5s per share * ~345MH = ~5000MH to send one Share..
Does anyone feel like comparing his numbers with mine? How many MH per share do you need?
Just having a math crunch munch.. ^_^
Est. Reward: 0.28700100 / PPS 0.00002877132165184 (10% Fee) = Shares submitted 9975 Before it's lower then PPS value, My Valid shares 11079 Value Per Share ~0.00002590132165184 (~18.97% Fee)
1 d 20:39:07 = 44h 39min = 160740 sec / Shares (11079) = 14.5s per share * ~345MH = ~5000MH to send one Share..
Does anyone feel like comparing his numbers with mine? How many MH per share do you need?
Just having a math crunch munch.. ^_^
July 17, 2011, 01:16:32 PM
it's already there. (click on hall of fame)
unfortunately, i'm not on it.
not on the top miner either (bumped off a week ago or so)
=]
'monkey
unfortunately, i'm not on it.
not on the top miner either (bumped off a week ago or so)
=]
'monkey
July 17, 2011, 12:53:05 PM
Hello, I switched here from Continuum pool when it shut down. I just got the newbie restriction lifted from my bitcoin forums account or I would have posted sooner. I am putting all my 885 MH/s towards this pool. I am just happy to know that Meni's scoring is being used to prevent pool hopping.
My user name on EMC is minecrafter. I found one of the block that the pool found so naturally a would like a table under top miners that has the top block finding miners.
Edit: I did not notice the hall of fame.
My user name on EMC is minecrafter. I found one of the block that the pool found so naturally a would like a table under top miners that has the top block finding miners.
Edit: I did not notice the hall of fame.
July 17, 2011, 11:02:52 AM
Good deal. I will work on reducing that further.
We solved a block, it's processing now!
We solved a block, it's processing now!
July 17, 2011, 05:26:41 AM
Can you guys let me know how the stale shares are going for you? They seem to be decreasing for me quite a bit.
I was running at a rate of 2% stales with a peak of 3% stales. Recent results seem to show a 1% stale rate. July 17, 2011, 01:23:19 AM
Can you guys let me know how the stale shares are going for you? They seem to be decreasing for me quite a bit.
July 16, 2011, 05:10:29 PM
Boy that bitcoind is really causing problems. I am going to approach it from a different angle that should keep it stable and reduce rejected shares but I need to figure out what's going on with the current implementation.
I am sorry that it was down, I thought I had the problem with the system licked and it was suppose to notify me if it went down, but I did not get a notification so I didn't notice it right away.
Going back to the stable Bitcoind shortly and that should take care of any issues and I will work on the stale share thing this afternoon.
I am sorry that it was down, I thought I had the problem with the system licked and it was suppose to notify me if it went down, but I did not get a notification so I didn't notice it right away.
Going back to the stable Bitcoind shortly and that should take care of any issues and I will work on the stale share thing this afternoon.
July 16, 2011, 03:53:45 PM
Up and running again. Yea!
July 16, 2011, 01:02:42 PM
I'm having sad thoughts about this pool.. It seem's we've hit a difficulty where we have to low hashing speed.. In the long block, I sent 17096 shares in for a 0,14324500 BTC. That is a loss of 0,34862951495985664 BTC if I'd been using PPS.. I too had a big dry spell from Continuum. With to low avg solving rate.. this just won't be enough to keep at it.
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
Start mining full time on Eclipse after it hits 300-500gh/s hash rate, at that point variance swings will be relatively low if everything is configured properly (even at 1.6m+ difficulty)
It's also one of the few pools offering SMS notifications so that's a unique perk.
July 16, 2011, 12:47:37 PM
I'm having sad thoughts about this pool.. It seem's we've hit a difficulty where we have to low hashing speed.. In the long block, I sent 17096 shares in for a 0,14324500 BTC. That is a loss of 0,34862951495985664 BTC if I'd been using PPS.. I too had a big dry spell from Continuum. With to low avg solving rate.. this just won't be enough to keep at it.
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
Long blocks happen. They happen for every pool. Short blocks happen too. it all evens out in the long run.
However 6% stales is very high. I would switch for that reason. I am getting 2% stales, a little high compared to ArsBitcoin (my backup pool) where I am getting less than one third of one percent stales.
A long poll problem perhaps?
?? Inaba? July 16, 2011, 11:35:01 AM
US pool seem to be down..
July 16, 2011, 10:58:29 AM
What's the payout system...?
July 16, 2011, 10:38:22 AM
Probability Time
Average 1 day, 7 hours, 6 minutes
50% 21 hours, 33 minutes
95% 3 days, 21 hours, 10 minutes
@ 60gh/s
This long block makes up for the 7 short blocks we had. In fact, without mathematically calculating it, it looks like EMC has been lucky. It all averages out.
Average 1 day, 7 hours, 6 minutes
50% 21 hours, 33 minutes
95% 3 days, 21 hours, 10 minutes
@ 60gh/s
This long block makes up for the 7 short blocks we had. In fact, without mathematically calculating it, it looks like EMC has been lucky. It all averages out.
July 16, 2011, 09:03:37 AM
I'm having sad thoughts about this pool.. It seem's we've hit a difficulty where we have to low hashing speed.. In the long block, I sent 17096 shares in for a 0,14324500 BTC. That is a loss of 0,34862951495985664 BTC if I'd been using PPS.. I too had a big dry spell from Continuum. With to low avg solving rate.. this just won't be enough to keep at it.
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
Not to talk about the 6% rejected shares.. >_< Guess it's time to end this trip.. or move it for PPS again. 340MH isn't cutting it..
Suggestions anyone?
July 15, 2011, 06:19:56 PM
Block has been processed. There is some display issues with Block Stats (Block duration is out of bounds and share calculation is way off obviously) - I will get that fixed this evening, but it's due to the proportional vs scoring. Since we switched to scoring the block stats calculation exploded; I had forgotten to check that. It's just visual issues not data issues, so nothing is lost.
Stats are correct under My Account though, which is what really matters anyway
Here's Block 19 round data:
id f c b r los lastscore totalscore
ID: 19 (136429) f: -0.0000100001000010 c: 0.00001000 b: 50 r: 0.0620144702512582 los: 2.7492200585903626 LSCORE: 308192.3953260782291181 TSCORE: 6398474.5277997702360153
Stats are correct under My Account though, which is what really matters anyway
Here's Block 19 round data:
id f c b r los lastscore totalscore
ID: 19 (136429) f: -0.0000100001000010 c: 0.00001000 b: 50 r: 0.0620144702512582 los: 2.7492200585903626 LSCORE: 308192.3953260782291181 TSCORE: 6398474.5277997702360153
July 15, 2011, 06:17:43 PM
All is well and the monster block has been solved!
That's great news! Just four days ago I switched to here from Continuum pool which had a dry spell for 10 days. So I thought I brought you guys the bad luck, but finally my first block in EMC is solved!By the way, the block stats on the web site say it's been 15170 days for this block
July 15, 2011, 05:04:40 PM
thanks for the update Inaba.
and now, back to your regular scheduled programming.....
=]
'monkey
and now, back to your regular scheduled programming.....
=]
'monkey
July 15, 2011, 05:02:59 PM
Yeah the scoring script died - well, the script works fine but mysql bombed because there are over 6 million rows in the DB and I did not have the lock buffers set high enough to handle that so it was choking. I upped them and the block is processing now but it's slow going. I will be changing the way share counts are calculated going forward so it won't take so long to process a block.
This block should be finished processing in another 30 minutes or so. No information is being lost and your share counts are going towards the next block even if it appears they are going towards the last block I know I keep saying it, but I want to be sure everyone is aware that all display stuff is complete separate from calculation information, this is to ensure that things like this don't affect you monetarily. Everything is double checked and cross compared before being committed to the DB.
All is well and the monster block has been solved!
This block should be finished processing in another 30 minutes or so. No information is being lost and your share counts are going towards the next block even if it appears they are going towards the last block
I know I keep saying it, but I want to be sure everyone is aware that all display stuff is complete separate from calculation information, this is to ensure that things like this don't affect you monetarily. Everything is double checked and cross compared before being committed to the DB.All is well and the monster block has been solved!
Jump to: