Ok, I will try to remember to look into it specifically tonight. Sabe and rearwheels, I may send you a couple test SMS tonight; you can ignore those but maybe post back if you got them and if there was anything unusual about them.
If you guys get charged by the SMS, let me know and I won't send out any test ones. I don't want ya'll to get charged, but I will try to find another way to test +65 location.
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 214. (Read 499791 times)
July 11, 2011, 10:22:17 AM
July 11, 2011, 07:32:37 AM
I tried +65XXXXXXXX, 65XXXXXXXX both not working for me.
July 11, 2011, 07:18:01 AM
I thought someone said they had it working there? Maybe not?
Is there a problem with that location?
Is there a problem with that location?
Not me, I was talking to Sabe about gmail alert.
I have mine set to +65xxxxxxxx did not get the block completed notification earlier.
July 11, 2011, 07:06:07 AM
I thought someone said they had it working there? Maybe not?
Is there a problem with that location?
Is there a problem with that location?
July 11, 2011, 06:57:12 AM
- SMS Notifications on failed miner, payouts, account changes and solved blocks
- Payouts in BTC or directly with Paypal in USD
- Mobile pages for viewing on your mobile devices
- On Demand payouts
- Automatic payouts
is this above for for EU residents too or only for US?
TIA
It's for everyone. Obviously, I've not been able to test every country, but has been tested working in Italy, Singapore, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Austria (I think) - it should work for nearly every country, so long as you format your mobile number properly for international SMS.
Hmmm, who has it working in Singapore?
July 11, 2011, 05:58:19 AM
Are you talking about each share individually or a aggregate of each score per miner?
Well, actually I was talking about individual shares. Of course that's a few 100 MiB for longer rounds. But it would be enough to keep them online for 10 days or so. And they compress really well. The individual shares are needed to check if the scoring works. And I think the pool will change to difficulty-2-shares somewhen anyway, that would again half the size.
Of course that should not hinder you to also provide nice aggregated statistics.
[edit:] Maybe I could volunteer then to write some python or perl script that does some statistics on the dump file if there are requests.
July 11, 2011, 05:07:11 AM
Just joined. Was in the Ars pool, but the SMPPS is boring. 300 MH/s heading your way.
Joined a few days ago. Figured I'd let my presence be known here as well, and give the thread a little bump.
Another 330 MH/s to add to the growing number.
July 11, 2011, 01:57:52 AM
Just joined. Was in the Ars pool, but the SMPPS is boring. 300 MH/s heading your way.
July 10, 2011, 11:39:42 PM
c is .001 and f is (-$c)/(1-$c)
July 10, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
On the scoring, what values are you using for c and f (as described by Meni's system)?
July 10, 2011, 08:46:45 PM
Are you talking about each share individually or a aggregate of each score per miner? There would be thousands of shares per user and going through them would be pretty crazy. I could put together an aggregate output on a per miner basis (I had already planned on doing this in graph form, anyway).
So let me know if you're talking about individual shares. I have no problem doing that, but with 1 million plus shares per block on average I don't see any realistic way to do that in an output on an individual share basis. I could maybe output the last n shares with a hashed username or something if individual shares are desired.
I'm certainly open to any suggestions though.
So let me know if you're talking about individual shares. I have no problem doing that, but with 1 million plus shares per block on average I don't see any realistic way to do that in an output on an individual share basis. I could maybe output the last n shares with a hashed username or something if individual shares are desired.
I'm certainly open to any suggestions though.
July 10, 2011, 08:38:37 PM
Ok, finished rewriting all the scoring code in C from PHP and it's running on all servers (US, EU and PACRIM).
Can anyone more familiar with Meni's scoring system tell me what data is valuable to you as far as output goes? I will make an output for blocks like Continuum after a block is completed, but is there other scoring data that is valuable/interesting to know?
Can anyone more familiar with Meni's scoring system tell me what data is valuable to you as far as output goes? I will make an output for blocks like Continuum after a block is completed, but is there other scoring data that is valuable/interesting to know?
I think it would be enough to put the score next to every share. It should be possible for everyone to recognize it's own shares. So you would publish the parameters for the algorithm (I know, you already did, but on the homepage or somewhere where it can be easily found) and how the miner can identify it's shares. I think that just hashing the workers user name would be anonymous enough.
With this information everyone can verify that every share got the right score and if the relation of his/her sum of scores and the payout conform. Actually, I never did that yet. But that's because I assumed that Meni himself checked this at Continuum.
July 10, 2011, 06:53:32 PM
Well, I like to be as open as possible without compromising private data.
Also - I haven't forgotten about the API on your output Koop - I got bogged down with this scoring thing, but I should have that fixed either tonight or early this week.
Also - I haven't forgotten about the API on your output Koop - I got bogged down with this scoring thing, but I should have that fixed either tonight or early this week.
July 10, 2011, 06:40:29 PM
I'm good with just knowing it's being used. Cheers!
July 10, 2011, 06:36:17 PM
Ok, finished rewriting all the scoring code in C from PHP and it's running on all servers (US, EU and PACRIM).
Can anyone more familiar with Meni's scoring system tell me what data is valuable to you as far as output goes? I will make an output for blocks like Continuum after a block is completed, but is there other scoring data that is valuable/interesting to know?
Can anyone more familiar with Meni's scoring system tell me what data is valuable to you as far as output goes? I will make an output for blocks like Continuum after a block is completed, but is there other scoring data that is valuable/interesting to know?
July 10, 2011, 11:22:20 AM
- SMS Notifications on failed miner, payouts, account changes and solved blocks
- Payouts in BTC or directly with Paypal in USD
- Mobile pages for viewing on your mobile devices
- On Demand payouts
- Automatic payouts
is this above for for EU residents too or only for US?
TIA
It's for everyone. Obviously, I've not been able to test every country, but has been tested working in Italy, Singapore, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Austria (I think) - it should work for nearly every country, so long as you format your mobile number properly for international SMS.
July 10, 2011, 11:02:55 AM
Just hit 70 GH/s 
July 10, 2011, 08:47:05 AM
solving blocks in a timely fashion is the coolest
'monkey
'monkey
I think it will be tradition that every alternate blocks are solved in a very short time.
July 10, 2011, 08:37:15 AM
- SMS Notifications on failed miner, payouts, account changes and solved blocks
- Payouts in BTC or directly with Paypal in USD
- Mobile pages for viewing on your mobile devices
- On Demand payouts
- Automatic payouts
is this above for for EU residents too or only for US?
TIA
July 09, 2011, 08:05:25 PM
How exactly does the scoring system work on this pool? Based on the last two blocks since I joined it seems like it is standard proportional:
1957326 Confirmed 21739 0.55532395
49166 Confirmed 1109 1.12781190
In both cases my reward is exactly my shares / total number of shares * 50.
1957326 Confirmed 21739 0.55532395
49166 Confirmed 1109 1.12781190
In both cases my reward is exactly my shares / total number of shares * 50.
The scoring system is running in tandem with the proportional system at the moment. The payouts are based on proportional until I am sure the score system is paying out properly. I am currently working on the output like Continuum has/had that someone requested earlier and I should have it functioning tonight - it will display the scoring pay vs your proportional pay. Once everyone is satisfied that it's correct and proper I'll cut out the proportional and rely solely on scoring.
Jump to: