[1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 55.

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on September 24, 2012, 09:21:30 AM

Quote from: dave3 on September 24, 2012, 06:31:40 AM

Quote from: Inaba on September 22, 2012, 08:26:40 PM

All servers have been updated for dynamic difficulty now. I've changed the parameters a bit to make the difficulty a little less - it now targets 12 getworks per minute in 3 minute windows (as opposed to 8 getworks per minute in a 3 minute window) ... meaning your difficulty won't be as high as it was on the dynamic test server at a given hashrate.

Let me know if there are any problems.

I will be taking diff10 and the dynamic server (port 8437) offline at some point, please take them out of your config files. Diff10 is repointed to us1 already, but the dynamic test server will just go poof at some point.

For what it's worth, on the dynamic us3:8437 server, I was seeing a total "U" value of 8. After switching back to the regular server, the total "U" value is 16.

Before:

Code:

(5s):1918.5 (avg):1597.9 Mh/s | Q:2601 A:11027 R:11 HW:0 E:424% U:8.0/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 622 NB: 165 LW: 53329 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.5[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---

After:

Code:

(5s):1161.3 (avg):1595.4 Mh/s | Q:239 A:3101 R:25 HW:0 E:1297% U:16.1/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 23 NB: 24 LW: 7624 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.9[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---

That's perfectly normal, as you are submitting less shares at higher difficulty. That's precisely why there's a WU column instead to compare and they're about the same within margin for normal variance over that time frame. Note they're *all* supposed to be variable difficulty by now as you can see since your U and WU don't match, displaying that.

I was just thinking since the servers are set to give out 12 getworks per minute now vs. 8 getworks per minute on the old dynamic test server, that I would see a new "U" value of 12 (instead of the 16 that I'm seeing).

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: dave3 on September 24, 2012, 06:31:40 AM

Quote from: Inaba on September 22, 2012, 08:26:40 PM

All servers have been updated for dynamic difficulty now. I've changed the parameters a bit to make the difficulty a little less - it now targets 12 getworks per minute in 3 minute windows (as opposed to 8 getworks per minute in a 3 minute window) ... meaning your difficulty won't be as high as it was on the dynamic test server at a given hashrate.

Let me know if there are any problems.

I will be taking diff10 and the dynamic server (port 8437) offline at some point, please take them out of your config files. Diff10 is repointed to us1 already, but the dynamic test server will just go poof at some point.

For what it's worth, on the dynamic us3:8437 server, I was seeing a total "U" value of 8. After switching back to the regular server, the total "U" value is 16.

Before:

Code:

(5s):1918.5 (avg):1597.9 Mh/s | Q:2601 A:11027 R:11 HW:0 E:424% U:8.0/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 622 NB: 165 LW: 53329 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.5[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---

After:

Code:

(5s):1161.3 (avg):1595.4 Mh/s | Q:239 A:3101 R:25 HW:0 E:1297% U:16.1/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 23 NB: 24 LW: 7624 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.9[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---

That's perfectly normal, as you are submitting less shares at higher difficulty. That's precisely why there's a WU column instead to compare and they're about the same within margin for normal variance over that time frame. Note they're *all* supposed to be variable difficulty by now as you can see since your U and WU don't match, displaying that.

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: Inaba on September 22, 2012, 08:26:40 PM

All servers have been updated for dynamic difficulty now. I've changed the parameters a bit to make the difficulty a little less - it now targets 12 getworks per minute in 3 minute windows (as opposed to 8 getworks per minute in a 3 minute window) ... meaning your difficulty won't be as high as it was on the dynamic test server at a given hashrate.

Let me know if there are any problems.

I will be taking diff10 and the dynamic server (port 8437) offline at some point, please take them out of your config files. Diff10 is repointed to us1 already, but the dynamic test server will just go poof at some point.

For what it's worth, on the dynamic us3:8437 server, I was seeing a total "U" value of 8. After switching back to the regular server, the total "U" value is 16.

Before:

Code:

(5s):1918.5 (avg):1597.9 Mh/s | Q:2601 A:11027 R:11 HW:0 E:424% U:8.0/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 622 NB: 165 LW: 53329 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.5
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---

After:

Code:

(5s):1161.3 (avg):1595.4 Mh/s | Q:239 A:3101 R:25 HW:0 E:1297% U:16.1/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 23 NB: 24 LW: 7624 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.9
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---

rudrigorc2

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Inaba on September 23, 2012, 11:03:17 PM

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on September 23, 2012, 10:11:09 PM

Quote from: Inaba on September 23, 2012, 09:38:06 PM

I'm not sure what you are saying? Can you elaborate?

until 2 days ago it was ok, 10ghash and normal submitting.

something changed yesterday/todays night ? Eclipse is showing only 5hash and my income is half too.

Yesterday all servers went to variable difficulty and GBT (not that GBT would affect you). What version of cgminer are you using? I'm curious if this is a problem with old versions of cgminer or something else.

I am still using 2.4.1 and I am unable to upgrade. I think that may be the problem

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on September 23, 2012, 10:11:09 PM

Quote from: Inaba on September 23, 2012, 09:38:06 PM

I'm not sure what you are saying? Can you elaborate?

until 2 days ago it was ok, 10ghash and normal submitting.

something changed yesterday/todays night ? Eclipse is showing only 5hash and my income is half too.

Yesterday all servers went to variable difficulty and GBT (not that GBT would affect you). What version of cgminer are you using? I'm curious if this is a problem with old versions of cgminer or something else.

uuidman

full member

Activity: 121

Merit: 100

Quote from: eleuthria on September 23, 2012, 10:06:07 PM

Quote from: uuidman on September 23, 2012, 10:00:15 PM

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on September 23, 2012, 09:37:08 PM

I just saw it. half mhash for 17 blocks now... why?

cgminer 2.4.1 cant upgrade

What he probably means is that cgminers mhash is approx half, in my case from 320 to 160 MH.

For me seen also with cgminer 2.4.1 but directly against stratum proxy (tested both) 0.5.0 and 0.8.3, (against btcguild ). Only clue for me yet is that its a 6950, 3 other 5850 same setup, no problem. Maybe you also got a 6950 ?

Just to verify: Do you mean you had the same problem on BTC Guild (with Stratum), or that it worked fine on BTC Guild?

If you had the problem on BTC Guild, was the hash rate on the BTC Guild website displaying accurately (and cgminer was just wrong)? I'm wondering if old cgminer versions calculated hashrate assuming submissions would always be difficulty=1. New versions definitely don't have any problem.

Same problem with BTC guild, but only on a rig with one 6950, the others alright with 5850 and all have cgminer 2.4.1. On the website the numbers seems right. I will upgrade the cgminer when I upgrade my mining build, for now an debian sid from nfsboot.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: eleuthria on September 23, 2012, 10:06:07 PM

...
If you had the problem on BTC Guild, was the hash rate on the BTC Guild website displaying accurately (and cgminer was just wrong)? I'm wondering if old cgminer versions calculated hashrate assuming submissions would always be difficulty=1. New versions definitely don't have any problem.

Cgminer hash rate isn't a calculation in anything except Icarus Abort (mandatory there for all mining software)
Everywhere else it is simply a counter.

However, the U: is still share based, not difficulty based.
WU: is 1 difficulty based, but not based on pool accepts, simply device work done
(and WU: was added recently)

rudrigorc2

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Inaba on September 23, 2012, 09:38:06 PM

I'm not sure what you are saying? Can you elaborate?

until 2 days ago it was ok, 10ghash and normal submitting.

something changed yesterday/todays night ? Eclipse is showing only 5hash and my income is half too.

eleuthria

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1007

Quote from: uuidman on September 23, 2012, 10:00:15 PM

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on September 23, 2012, 09:37:08 PM

I just saw it. half mhash for 17 blocks now... why?

cgminer 2.4.1 cant upgrade

What he probably means is that cgminers mhash is approx half, in my case from 320 to 160 MH.

For me seen also with cgminer 2.4.1 but directly against stratum proxy (tested both) 0.5.0 and 0.8.3, (against btcguild ). Only clue for me yet is that its a 6950, 3 other 5850 same setup, no problem. Maybe you also got a 6950 ?

Just to verify: Do you mean you had the same problem on BTC Guild (with Stratum), or that it worked fine on BTC Guild?

If you had the problem on BTC Guild, was the hash rate on the BTC Guild website displaying accurately (and cgminer was just wrong)? I'm wondering if old cgminer versions calculated hashrate assuming submissions would always be difficulty=1. New versions definitely don't have any problem.

uuidman

full member

Activity: 121

Merit: 100

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on September 23, 2012, 09:37:08 PM

I just saw it. half mhash for 17 blocks now... why?

cgminer 2.4.1 cant upgrade

What he probably means is that cgminers mhash is approx half, in my case from 320 to 160 MH.

For me seen also with cgminer 2.4.1 but directly against stratum proxy (tested both) 0.5.0 and 0.8.3, (against btcguild ). Only clue for me yet is that its a 6950, 3 other 5850 same setup, no problem. Maybe you also got a 6950 ?

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

I'm not sure what you are saying? Can you elaborate?

rudrigorc2

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

I just saw it. half mhash for 17 blocks now... why?

cgminer 2.4.1 cant upgrade

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

EMC is now working with GBT as well, so updating to v2.8.0 of BFGminer will let you mine with GBT instead of getwork as an added bonus.

eleuthria

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1007

Quote from: BR0KK on September 23, 2012, 06:07:31 PM

thats Ztex BTC miner.

On a Windows VM... (on am Mac host ....). Its complicated ... i think i have these issues since the last MAC Software update (that should not have anything to do with the Windows VMs... but somehow it has, because it interferes in some way with the USB connections they are a hell lot more unstable since then .... even my silex device Server doesn't work anymore.)

I have no clue what I'm doing here, ill figure it out tomorrow evening:)

I use ztex FPGAs, and I've found bfgminer 2.8.0 to be excellent for them. Much better than the default ztex BTCminer.

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Looks to me like that software does not support > difficulty 1 shares.

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

thats Ztex BTC miner.

On a Windows VM... (on am Mac host ....). Its complicated ... i think i have these issues since the last MAC Software update (that should not have anything to do with the Windows VMs... but somehow it has, because it interferes in some way with the USB connections they are a hell lot more unstable since then .... even my silex device Server doesn't work anymore.)

I have no clue what I'm doing here, ill figure it out tomorrow evening:)

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

What mining program are you using?

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

im getting this since today:

Code:

bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: Set frequency from 232,00MHz to 228,00MH
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3468E00-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346E12C-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3468E00-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346E12C-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-3: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3469756-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-3: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A346D523-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-4: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A3469756-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15d4-04A32E1205-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-1: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A36E24F2-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-2: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash
bus-0-0: ztex_ufm1_15y1-04A3461185-1: Warning: Rejected block: high-hash

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

All servers have been updated for dynamic difficulty now. I've changed the parameters a bit to make the difficulty a little less - it now targets 12 getworks per minute in 3 minute windows (as opposed to 8 getworks per minute in a 3 minute window) ... meaning your difficulty won't be as high as it was on the dynamic test server at a given hashrate.

Let me know if there are any problems.

I will be taking diff10 and the dynamic server (port 8437) offline at some point, please take them out of your config files. Diff10 is repointed to us1 already, but the dynamic test server will just go poof at some point.

DobZombie

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 532

Former curator of The Bitcoin Museum

That's why I've got all the servers listed in my backup pools. They've all gotta be down for me to disconnect from EMC

Inuba, you're mining at 400ghs? You must have some of those BFL sc hooked up?

Can't wait for mine. 40gh/s is gonna be AWESOME Cheesy

Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 55. (Read 499791 times)