[1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 55.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: P_Shep on September 27, 2012, 02:00:31 AM

Peaks at 9... There's no way EMC some how had over 20000 shares (equivilent) submitted in the same time the others has 10000.
Forget about submitted shares.
I'm just talking about Get works. EMC has more get works over the same time than the other pools. That shouldn't be the case.

Oh I see. Maybe has a shorter rolltime set, dunno. Anyway soon with stratum and friends all these statistics become irrelevant.

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

Peaks at 9... There's no way EMC some how had over 20000 shares (equivilent) submitted in the same time the others has 10000.
Forget about submitted shares.
I'm just talking about Get works. EMC has more get works over the same time than the other pools. That shouldn't be the case.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: P_Shep on September 27, 2012, 01:02:30 AM

Quote from: kano on September 26, 2012, 09:35:18 PM

Quote from: -ck on September 26, 2012, 09:16:26 PM

Quote from: P_Shep on September 26, 2012, 08:33:56 PM

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.

If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.

Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE:

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6

I'm looking at absolutes... Higher difficulty shares is drastically reducing up traffic as expected, but at the expense of down traffic. I'm thinking there's an optimal trade-off between difficulty and traffic. Inaba basically arbitrarily chose where to put the difficulty. With a little experimentation the optimal Hashrate/difficulty ratio could be found. ...Or function, perhaps it's not linear.
As a comparison with the original diff 1 shares I was getting efficiencies of 700-800% at EMC. CGminer is telling me difficulty peaks at ~9 ( I have 5000MH/s)
It's not a problem, after all most Internet connections have a high download rate. Just thought I'd raise the issue.

You missed the point then. If your average difficulty is 9 then your effective efficiency is 356.4 * 9.

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

Quote from: kano on September 26, 2012, 09:35:18 PM

Quote from: -ck on September 26, 2012, 09:16:26 PM

Quote from: P_Shep on September 26, 2012, 08:33:56 PM

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.

If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.

Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE:

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6

I'm looking at absolutes... Higher difficulty shares is drastically reducing up traffic as expected, but at the expense of down traffic. I'm thinking there's an optimal trade-off between difficulty and traffic. Inaba basically arbitrarily chose where to put the difficulty. With a little experimentation the optimal Hashrate/difficulty ratio could be found. ...Or function, perhaps it's not linear.
As a comparison with the original diff 1 shares I was getting efficiencies of 700-800% at EMC. CGminer is telling me difficulty peaks at ~9 ( I have 5000MH/s)
It's not a problem, after all most Internet connections have a high download rate. Just thought I'd raise the issue.

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

Quote from: cyberlync on September 26, 2012, 06:04:10 PM

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 09:02:02 AM

Quote from: cyberlync on September 26, 2012, 08:47:11 AM

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 02:32:03 AM

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

Well, I know there has been one in the past, been mining here for quite some time, but it has been taken down, due to high cost. I also recall Inaba mentioning that he has been looking at some cheaper hosts, so there is a good chance it will be online again. In the meantime, while it points to us1 anyway, I just think it's confusing to newcomers to call it EU.

i missed that, good to know ty Wink

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on September 25, 2012, 05:19:10 AM

Looks perfect. Note how the WU is identical on both counts, and that the dynamic server is changing the diff on more than one occasion. It will start at diff 1 and slowly converge on the best balanced diff over time.

Inaba, notice what I have reported before how there are 2 longpolls 15 seconds apart on dynamic diff though? cgminer can tell when a longpoll is associated with a new block or just a request for a work restart. This 2nd longpoll still seems wrong.

Quote from: Inaba on September 25, 2012, 08:21:30 AM

Does it only happen on the test server or on the regular servers as well?

I'm not noticing the 2 longpolls on the regular server lately. I am getting mostly difficulty 1 work on the regular servers, though, vs. difficulty 3-4 on the old dynamic test server.

Code:

 cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-26 12:10:13]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1649.6 (avg):1597.3 Mh/s | Q:1574  A:22040  R:98  HW:0  E:1400%  U:15.9/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 3  SS: 0  DW: 79  NB: 138  LW: 55791  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 21.9
 Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
 Block: 0000057befa5e4ea1f12b6b56fa989a5...  Started: [11:11:32]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  60.2C         | 803.1/798.7Mh/s | A:11041 R:49 HW:2 U: 7.98/m
 BFL 1:  63.4C         | 803.5/798.6Mh/s | A:11001 R:49 HW:0 U: 7.96/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-09-27 11:09:57] Accepted afa33bbb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:13] Accepted 1a3b9d2e Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:14] Accepted 44666613 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:14] Accepted 602149e8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:18] Accepted 62f0fa16 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:20] Accepted 2c49a385 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:25] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-27 11:10:36] Accepted 1fc2f51b Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:36] Accepted 500a382d Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:38] Accepted 2e9dc75e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:52] Accepted 43b06466 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:58] Accepted 636b4a48 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:58] Accepted 3eb0c5cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:10:59] Accepted 7cd95ce8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:03] Accepted 7f7e4a38 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:30] Rejected 3466ea5f Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-09-27 11:11:31] Rejected 39d00c82 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-09-27 11:11:32] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-09-27 11:11:43] Accepted 795269f0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:44] Accepted 45d8e560 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:48] Accepted 7432e540 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:49] Accepted 5669dba7 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:54] Accepted 64fac8bb Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:11:59] Accepted 28c1cdaa Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:05] Accepted 3c1a1f4a Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:10] Accepted 1ed1da11 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:10] Accepted 8c657058 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:15] Accepted 367221cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:15] Accepted 55ebc308 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:31] Accepted 8bae2d32 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:31] Accepted 6e2f41cd Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:36] Accepted 78a3ead1 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:42] Accepted 3ed611cc Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:47] Accepted 675e97e7 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:12:47] Accepted 602b37bd Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:13:03] Accepted 38d160d6 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-09-27 11:13:03] Accepted 2d07a0a8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: -ck on September 26, 2012, 09:16:26 PM

Quote from: P_Shep on September 26, 2012, 08:33:56 PM

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.

If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.

Yeah use the API 'pools' and look at:
"Difficulty Accepted", "Difficulty Rejected", "Getworks"

To compare "A:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" instead

To compare "R:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Rejected" instead

To compare "E:" but including difficulty - compare "Difficulty Accepted" / "Getworks"

which I'd call DA: DR: and DE:

Edit: "Accepted difficulty shares:" and "Rejected difficulty shares:" are also reported in the summary when you exit cgminer

Edit2: oh yeah ... 2.7.6

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: P_Shep on September 26, 2012, 08:33:56 PM

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.

If you're mining at higher difficulty, you need to take that into account because at diff 3 for example you'll be getting 1/3 the accepted amount and that's normal.

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

There may need to be some tweaking done to get efficency up (either to the pool, or cgminer). I'm getting the following results:

http://pool.maxbtc.com:8332      GW:668   A:10229   E:1531.3 %
http://us2.ozco.in:8332         GW:347   A:9074   E:2615 %
http://us1.eclipsemc.com:8337   GW:764   A:2723   E:356.4 %

I'm particularly looking at the Get Works. It's pretty well up there.

cyberlync

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 09:02:02 AM

Quote from: cyberlync on September 26, 2012, 08:47:11 AM

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 02:32:03 AM

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

Well, I know there has been one in the past, been mining here for quite some time, but it has been taken down, due to high cost. I also recall Inaba mentioning that he has been looking at some cheaper hosts, so there is a good chance it will be online again. In the meantime, while it points to us1 anyway, I just think it's confusing to newcomers to call it EU.

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

Quote from: cyberlync on September 26, 2012, 08:47:11 AM

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 02:32:03 AM

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

yes "EU" server, some months back a server was called so (ask inaba), now its really pointing to us1.eclipsemc.com Wink

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

@#$#@$ data center. Power went out again. I've got the new server built in the new data center, I just need to transfer everything over.

cyberlync

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: K1773R on September 26, 2012, 02:32:03 AM

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

EU server? afaik it has not been set up yet? it's just pointing to us1 or something?

stevegee58

legendary

Activity: 916

Merit: 1003

US1 appears to be down for about 3 hours.

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

EU Server (208.110.68.114) is down since some time now.

EDIT:
down since 3 hours.

Inaba

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Does it only happen on the test server or on the regular servers as well?

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: dave3 on September 25, 2012, 05:10:17 AM

Quote from: -ck on September 24, 2012, 02:14:34 PM

I don't think the estimation from the server will be perfect to give you exactly the right number of getworks. It will only ever be approximate within a range of timeframes. If you run cgminer 2.7.6 it will show you what diff shares you are submitting now.

I upgraded cgminer from 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 today and ran it for a few hours on both a regular server, and the dynamic test server to compare them.

This is with a regular server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8337):

Code:

cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 13:50:55]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1878.9 (avg):1596.6 Mh/s | Q:154 A:1979 R:6 HW:0 E:1285% U:15.9/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 17 NB: 14 LW: 5007 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.1
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
Block: 00000343360189b2e6653ae3f7eb361e... Started: [15:28:23]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BFL 0: 59.8C | 803.7/798.9Mh/s | A:1000 R:4 HW:0 U: 8.06/m
BFL 1: 62.7C | 803.8/797.7Mh/s | A: 981 R:2 HW:0 U: 7.90/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2012-09-25 15:52:31] Accepted 0e608cb9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0

This is with the dynamic test server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8437):

Code:

cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 15:56:27]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1468.6 (avg):1582.5 Mh/s | Q:238 A:1003 R:0 HW:0 E:421% U:8.3/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 50 NB: 15 LW: 4656 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.1
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---
Block: 00000005f1bf5387d0157105a798cd0e... Started: [17:56:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BFL 0: 59.8C | 677.6/791.6Mh/s | A:508 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.20/m
BFL 1: 62.6C | 675.1/791.6Mh/s | A:496 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.10/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2012-09-25 17:53:19] Accepted 49cb55c7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:32] Accepted 41e5c544 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:42] Accepted 3e5718c1 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:50] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
[2012-09-25 17:57:05] LONGPOLL from pool 0 requested work restart
[2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 062c4e21 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0

Looks perfect. Note how the WU is identical on both counts, and that the dynamic server is changing the diff on more than one occasion. It will start at diff 1 and slowly converge on the best balanced diff over time.

Inaba, notice what I have reported before how there are 2 longpolls 15 seconds apart on dynamic diff though? cgminer can tell when a longpoll is associated with a new block or just a request for a work restart. This 2nd longpoll still seems wrong.

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on September 24, 2012, 02:14:34 PM

I don't think the estimation from the server will be perfect to give you exactly the right number of getworks. It will only ever be approximate within a range of timeframes. If you run cgminer 2.7.6 it will show you what diff shares you are submitting now.

I upgraded cgminer from 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 today and ran it for a few hours on both a regular server, and the dynamic test server to compare them.

This is with a regular server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8337):

Code:

cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 13:50:55]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1878.9 (avg):1596.6 Mh/s | Q:154 A:1979 R:6 HW:0 E:1285% U:15.9/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 17 NB: 14 LW: 5007 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.1
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
Block: 00000343360189b2e6653ae3f7eb361e... Started: [15:28:23]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BFL 0: 59.8C | 803.7/798.9Mh/s | A:1000 R:4 HW:0 U: 8.06/m
BFL 1: 62.7C | 803.8/797.7Mh/s | A: 981 R:2 HW:0 U: 7.90/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2012-09-25 15:52:31] Accepted 0e608cb9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:33] Accepted 55ff4821 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:42] Accepted 05ec9fc0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:42] Accepted b1fc8319 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:47] Accepted 0276cffd Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:48] Accepted 2753bbc0 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:55] Accepted 5110c078 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:52:55] Accepted d42a26ae Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:00] Accepted b950b119 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:05] Accepted 55edde49 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:09] Accepted 00e85f88 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:09] Accepted 8cfcad21 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:14] Accepted 71bc86cd Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:21] Accepted 9d78a652 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:25] Accepted c50b2095 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:30] Accepted 217974b9 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:41] Accepted 9a920baf Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:41] Accepted 7ed0bb23 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:43] Accepted 2a6c466f Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:46] Accepted 9857a9d5 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:48] Accepted b5c1cc2e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:52] Accepted 6743b6ff Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:52] Accepted 2dc972cb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:54] Accepted 77e4d753 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:53:59] Accepted 29a11631 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:02] Accepted 6571c1ed Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:18] Accepted bab78252 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:20] Accepted 02da1ab3 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:27] Accepted 4d5210ee Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:29] Accepted 99466391 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:31] Accepted 7ea77f2b Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:31] Accepted 636bd8f8 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:47] Accepted 8e54c592 Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:50] Accepted 8cba9563 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:54:58] Accepted b2b6e95e Diff 1 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:55:01] Accepted 66a19fcb Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 15:55:01] Accepted 1bebd1a8 Diff 1 BFL 0 pool 0

This is with the dynamic test server (us3.eclipsemc.com:8437):

Code:

cgminer version 2.7.6 - Started: [2012-09-25 15:56:27]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1468.6 (avg):1582.5 Mh/s | Q:238 A:1003 R:0 HW:0 E:421% U:8.3/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 50 NB: 15 LW: 4656 GF: 1 RF: 0 WU: 22.1
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---
Block: 00000005f1bf5387d0157105a798cd0e... Started: [17:56:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BFL 0: 59.8C | 677.6/791.6Mh/s | A:508 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.20/m
BFL 1: 62.6C | 675.1/791.6Mh/s | A:496 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.10/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2012-09-25 17:53:19] Accepted 49cb55c7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:53:41] Accepted 02086e52 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:53:57] Accepted 2e7f4139 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 0075386a Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 1a00b705 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:02] Accepted 4a2ed23d Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:07] Accepted 4557f784 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:18] Accepted 3655886d Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:23] Accepted 4441bebe Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:29] Accepted 3b213e0d Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:29] Accepted 1605cab9 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:50] Accepted 47808422 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:56] Accepted 13c76db5 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:54:56] Accepted 2542d6cc Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:01] Accepted 0321f232 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:01] Accepted 39169afd Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:11] Accepted 49a31924 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:12] Accepted 0da5cfc7 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:17] Accepted 262aabc0 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:17] Accepted 1732aeab Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:28] Accepted 26c27c9f Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:33] Accepted 1fb350f5 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:33] Accepted 385fe40c Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:38] Accepted 196fe903 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:44] Accepted 4cc5006d Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:54] Accepted 25339073 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:55:59] Accepted 276ed065 Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:00] Accepted 184a84f4 Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:00] Accepted 05b945fc Diff 3 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:10] Accepted 19dcec1f Diff 3 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:32] Accepted 41e5c544 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:42] Accepted 3e5718c1 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:56:50] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
[2012-09-25 17:57:05] LONGPOLL from pool 0 requested work restart
[2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 062c4e21 Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:57:16] Accepted 14c46c49 Diff 4 BFL 1 pool 0
[2012-09-25 17:57:22] Accepted 04c7a1ba Diff 4 BFL 0 pool 0

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: dave3 on September 24, 2012, 09:30:49 AM

I was just thinking since the servers are set to give out 12 getworks per minute now vs. 8 getworks per minute on the old dynamic test server, that I would see a new "U" value of 12 (instead of the 16 that I'm seeing).

I don't think the estimation from the server will be perfect to give you exactly the right number of getworks. It will only ever be approximate within a range of timeframes. If you run cgminer 2.7.6 it will show you what diff shares you are submitting now.

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on September 24, 2012, 09:21:30 AM

Quote from: dave3 on September 24, 2012, 06:31:40 AM

Quote from: Inaba on September 22, 2012, 08:26:40 PM

All servers have been updated for dynamic difficulty now. I've changed the parameters a bit to make the difficulty a little less - it now targets 12 getworks per minute in 3 minute windows (as opposed to 8 getworks per minute in a 3 minute window) ... meaning your difficulty won't be as high as it was on the dynamic test server at a given hashrate.

Let me know if there are any problems.

I will be taking diff10 and the dynamic server (port 8437) offline at some point, please take them out of your config files. Diff10 is repointed to us1 already, but the dynamic test server will just go poof at some point.

For what it's worth, on the dynamic us3:8437 server, I was seeing a total "U" value of 8. After switching back to the regular server, the total "U" value is 16.

Before:

Code:

(5s):1918.5 (avg):1597.9 Mh/s | Q:2601 A:11027 R:11 HW:0 E:424% U:8.0/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 622 NB: 165 LW: 53329 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.5[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8437 with LP as user ---

After:

Code:

(5s):1161.3 (avg):1595.4 Mh/s | Q:239 A:3101 R:25 HW:0 E:1297% U:16.1/m
TQ: 0 ST: 3 SS: 0 DW: 23 NB: 24 LW: 7624 GF: 1 RF: 0 [b]WU: 22.9[/b]
Connected to http://us3.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---

That's perfectly normal, as you are submitting less shares at higher difficulty. That's precisely why there's a WU column instead to compare and they're about the same within margin for normal variance over that time frame. Note they're *all* supposed to be variable difficulty by now as you can see since your U and WU don't match, displaying that.

I was just thinking since the servers are set to give out 12 getworks per minute now vs. 8 getworks per minute on the old dynamic test server, that I would see a new "U" value of 12 (instead of the 16 that I'm seeing).

Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 55. (Read 499709 times)