Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 144. (Read 2591920 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
The ports are fine I didn't setup a firewall that I know off

tried to connect miner to your node, it has dead status, it seems like network or firewall issue there. packets probably get without problem to node but do not get back. ask admin, provider about firewall, routing settings.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
The ports are fine I didn't setup a firewall that I know off

But maybe your provider has?

Edit: Another BLOCK!!  Grin
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
The ports are fine I didn't setup a firewall that I know off
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Any ideas why I can access my public node via the browser but cgminer can't resolve it up address is 62.75.188.90:9332

I get occasional dropped connections when I ping your node - did you contact your provider to make sure they are forwarding ports? Is your firewall configured?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Any ideas why I can access my public node via the browser but cgminer can't resolve it up address is 62.75.188.90:9332

wrong network settings?
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Any ideas why I can access my public node via the browser but cgminer can't resolve it up address is 62.75.188.90:9332
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Is anyone here using the S7 on p2pool? If so, how are they performing? I'm interested to know if they are still using the crazy queue settings with their cgminer fork & if anyone has replaced it with the mainline cgminer yet. If bitmain lower their prices again soon, I might be tempted.....if they work OK with p2pool that is.

Performance suffers with default cgminer on p2pool. I was getting about 4.4 TH/s on p2pool and 4.6 TH/s on Eligius.

You have already got S7? My piece is paid but did not arrive yet...
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Is anyone here using the S7 on p2pool? If so, how are they performing? I'm interested to know if they are still using the crazy queue settings with their cgminer fork & if anyone has replaced it with the mainline cgminer yet. If bitmain lower their prices again soon, I might be tempted.....if they work OK with p2pool that is.

Performance suffers with default cgminer on p2pool. I was getting about 4.4 TH/s on p2pool and 4.6 TH/s on Eligius.
Still their fork, still none of my improvements in it Tongue
hero member
Activity: 818
Merit: 1006
Is anyone here using the S7 on p2pool? If so, how are they performing? I'm interested to know if they are still using the crazy queue settings with their cgminer fork & if anyone has replaced it with the mainline cgminer yet. If bitmain lower their prices again soon, I might be tempted.....if they work OK with p2pool that is.

Performance suffers with default cgminer on p2pool. I was getting about 4.4 TH/s on p2pool and 4.6 TH/s on Eligius.
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Hey windpath, 376738 was not a p2pool orphan.  P2Pool beat out whatever other pool also submitted that block (payout address was 16EW6Rv9P9AxFDBrZV816dD4sj1EAYUX3f).  Your front end shows it as an orphan.

Hit refresh Wink
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
Hey windpath, 376738 was not a p2pool orphan.  P2Pool beat out whatever other pool also submitted that block (payout address was 16EW6Rv9P9AxFDBrZV816dD4sj1EAYUX3f).  Your front end shows it as an orphan.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Woot!  Back to back blocks for p2pool Grin

BOOM BOOM!!   Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
Woot!  Back to back blocks for p2pool Grin
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Is anyone here using the S7 on p2pool? If so, how are they performing? I'm interested to know if they are still using the crazy queue settings with their cgminer fork & if anyone has replaced it with the mainline cgminer yet. If bitmain lower their prices again soon, I might be tempted.....if they work OK with p2pool that is.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool

That indicates 7667 seconds used by the poll() function inside twisted, of about 9606 seconds total for the whole program.


I take it you mean milliseconds?

Most of what you say goes straight over my head I'm afraid - far beyond my pay grade  Wink Have you tried contacting forrestv at all?

No, seconds. That's the cumulative use of all of the 1828987 calls to poll(), or an average of 0.004 seconds per call.

On second thought, those poll() calls might be including time that the CPU isn't actually busy, and yielding to other threads and processes. I'll have to take a closer look, and maybe compare the results with my other node (which has much higher loading).
You're spot on jtoomin.  The fact is that the code is single threaded, so even with a blazing fast CPU, you're going to see huge spikes in CPU load when you've got significant traffic (either because of transaction spamming of the network, or from a large number of connected miners).  While not an ideal solution, if you've got a large number of miners on your node, you might want to setup multiple nodes and spread the traffic load across them.  Not sure if that's an option for you, though... it's just a suggestion.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
thread should be renamed, I would recommend "p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool"
hero member
Activity: 818
Merit: 1006

That indicates 7667 seconds used by the poll() function inside twisted, of about 9606 seconds total for the whole program.


I take it you mean milliseconds?

Most of what you say goes straight over my head I'm afraid - far beyond my pay grade  Wink Have you tried contacting forrestv at all?

No, seconds. That's the cumulative use of all of the 1828987 calls to poll(), or an average of 0.004 seconds per call.

On second thought, those poll() calls might be including time that the CPU isn't actually busy, and yielding to other threads and processes. I'll have to take a closer look, and maybe compare the results with my other node (which has much higher loading).
hero member
Activity: 818
Merit: 1006
I noticed on the p2pool scroll every time I hit the the stat page, I get the following errors:

...

2015-09-26 06:34:32.559000 >
2015-09-26 06:34:32.559000 >   File "p2pool\web.pyc", line 338, in
2015-09-26 06:34:32.559000 >
2015-09-26 06:34:32.559000 > exceptions.TypeError: %x format: a number is requir
ed, not NoneType

Here's line 338 of web.py:


    new_root.putChild('best_share_hash', WebInterface(lambda: '%064x' % node.best_share_var.value))

I think what it's saying is that you don't have any shares yet, so you don't have a best_share_var.

You should know that Antminer S5s have some significant problems with p2pool that causes (a) lost hashrate unless you replace the default cgminer binary, and (b) instability, which can result in (c) hardware damage due to the S5 shutting down the fan immediately when cgminer stops running but heat continuing to be generated by the ASICs for several minutes afterward.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
After the 5Ph/s peak ... we have waves ...  Grin so, P2Pool is the best pool ?  Cheesy

Sure and it can deserve more than that !

COME HERE !!!

Jump to: