Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 673. (Read 2591920 times)
afaik you can get zope and twisted over macports
Yep, update to 2.7 and install twisted and zope 
I'm running 2.7.2 and twisted is installed. I'll try zope
edit: zope is only for windows? i'm on OS X Lion
Your Twisted is too old. It's not Python.
Yep, update to 2.7 and install twisted and zope
I'm running 2.7.2 and twisted is installed. I'll try zope
edit: zope is only for windows? i'm on OS X Lion
Update on github: commit 002d037ca1
Zipped scrs: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/master
or
Zipped scrs: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/master
or
Code:
git clone https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool.git
Win64 binary on my skydrive: http://sdrv.ms/NtmDt5
Yep, update to 2.7 and install twisted and zope
any idea how to fix this error on start?
Code:
File "run_p2pool.py", line 3, in
from p2pool import main
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/p2pool/main.py", line 22, in
from nattraverso import portmapper, ipdiscover
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/nattraverso/ipdiscover.py", line 24, in
@defer.inlineCallbacks
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'inlineCallbacks'
from p2pool import main
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/p2pool/main.py", line 22, in
from nattraverso import portmapper, ipdiscover
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/nattraverso/ipdiscover.py", line 24, in
@defer.inlineCallbacks
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'inlineCallbacks'
Your python version is too old?
inlineCallbacks require version 2.5 or later
any idea how to fix this error on start?
Code:
File "run_p2pool.py", line 3, in
from p2pool import main
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/p2pool/main.py", line 22, in
from nattraverso import portmapper, ipdiscover
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/nattraverso/ipdiscover.py", line 24, in
@defer.inlineCallbacks
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'inlineCallbacks'
from p2pool import main
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/p2pool/main.py", line 22, in
from nattraverso import portmapper, ipdiscover
File "/Users/christian/p2pool/nattraverso/ipdiscover.py", line 24, in
@defer.inlineCallbacks
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'inlineCallbacks'
Update progress report: v4 sharehain is on 85% of nodes!
If you still not have v3.1 update NOW!
If you still not have v3.1 update NOW!
Hi all,
has someone time to test my public node?
It has 0% Fee.
http://p2pool-cologne.dyndns.org:9332
Thanks
has someone time to test my public node?
It has 0% Fee.
http://p2pool-cologne.dyndns.org:9332
Thanks
That's my node !
I don't mine on it currently (waiting for the efficiency problems to be fixed) but I thought I'd left it up anyway as it runs like a boss with automatic updates and next to no maintenance time needed. It probably is in the 99.9 / 99.99% availability range so it is my backup pool...
Rav3n_pl forwarded me a link to his local p2Pool stats page, which was very useful.
Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
These two pools are/were advertised publicly.. although it looks like p2pmining.com recently reset their stats. The other one goes from April to June.
http://p2pmining.com:9332/static/graphs.html
http://linode.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
Rav3n_pl forwarded me a link to his local p2Pool stats page, which was very useful.
Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
I was sort of assuming that they would all have the same stats? I run a node that I don't mine to, and that I don't advertise on a fast box with a decent connection. Do you still want the url? Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
Rav3n_pl forwarded me a link to his local p2Pool stats page, which was very useful.
Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
Can anyone else do that? Or take a screenshot or something? You can pm me the screenshot so it wont end up public.
While appears message "LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for x.x minutes" p2pool_run.exe load one CPU core for 100%, it is normal?
version 3.1
version 3.1
Quote
Maybe your wallet password is the same as your bitcoind connect password written in the conf?
If so, change your pasword! Too easy to steal your bitcoin in that setup.
Miner don't need any connection to any wallet.
Guiminer has only one spot for a password, which is for connecting to bitcoind/p2pool/pool. p2pool doesn't need and have a connection password, though?
Ente
When i got home i checked my bitcoin.conf file and i didnt have one If so, change your pasword! Too easy to steal your bitcoin in that setup.
Miner don't need any connection to any wallet.
Guiminer has only one spot for a password, which is for connecting to bitcoind/p2pool/pool. p2pool doesn't need and have a connection password, though?
Ente
I seem to be living in a noob parrallel universe because i remember putting one there
I did not even think i could run bitcoin in server mode without one, anyway this solved my problems, and now i am very happy my 61Mhash card is crunching at 102MHs now according to the stats
One must also question the efficiency of that miner. When I was still with P2pool, I was around 5% stales (still >100% efficiency), but that will deduct from the actual payout. PPS pools use lower difficulty shares and typically have much lower stale rates.
As long as your stale rates on p2Pool are similar to everyone else's, stales won't affect your payout in p2Pool.
Is the correct wording.
True. So is it correct to say whatever your current doa/orphan rate is must be subtracted from your local hashrate in order to provide an actual estimate of shares received? That's what ChanceCoats123 was saying.
Well you can see it as so, if the average DOA of p2pool network is 10% and the p2pool network runs at 200GH then the network is only really hashing away at 180GH due to 20GH going to waste.
So yes in effect he is losing 10% of his own hashrate in this deal but if the whole network is losing the same amount everyone is earning the same proportion of the earnings - lost earnings.
So while this is a loss of earnings to miners, it can't account for the longer than average round lengths.
One must also question the efficiency of that miner. When I was still with P2pool, I was around 5% stales (still >100% efficiency), but that will deduct from the actual payout. PPS pools use lower difficulty shares and typically have much lower stale rates.
As long as your stale rates on p2Pool are similar to everyone else's, stales won't affect your payout in p2Pool.
Is the correct wording.
True. So is it correct to say whatever your current doa/orphan rate is must be subtracted from your local hashrate in order to provide an actual estimate of shares received? That's what ChanceCoats123 was saying.
Well you can see it as so, if the average DOA of p2pool network is 10% and the p2pool network runs at 200GH then the network is only really hashing away at 180GH due to 20GH going to waste.
So yes in effect he is losing 10% of his own hashrate in this deal but if the whole network is losing the same amount everyone is earning the same proportion of the earnings - lost earnings.
One must also question the efficiency of that miner. When I was still with P2pool, I was around 5% stales (still >100% efficiency), but that will deduct from the actual payout. PPS pools use lower difficulty shares and typically have much lower stale rates.
As long as your stale rates on p2Pool are similar to everyone else's, stales won't affect your payout in p2Pool.
Is the correct wording.
True. So is it correct to say whatever your current doa/orphan rate is must be subtracted from your local hashrate in order to provide an actual estimate of shares received? That's what ChanceCoats123 was saying.
One must also question the efficiency of that miner. When I was still with P2pool, I was around 5% stales (still >100% efficiency), but that will deduct from the actual payout. PPS pools use lower difficulty shares and typically have much lower stale rates.
As long as your stale rates on p2Pool are similar to everyone else's, stales won't affect your payout in p2Pool.
Is the correct wording.
One must also question the efficiency of that miner. When I was still with P2pool, I was around 5% stales (still >100% efficiency), but that will deduct from the actual payout. PPS pools use lower difficulty shares and typically have much lower stale rates.
As long as your stale rates on p2Pool are similar to everyone else's, stales won't affect your payout in p2Pool.
Jump to: