So if you keep choosing odds of 1.90 or lower with a 50% chance of winning, do you think you can win in the long run? This is like giving the house an edge of 10%, and that's too much to give, yet we are too confident in winning. Are we being realistic here, or are we just too confident in our skills that we believe we can win 60% of the time?
Are there any gamblers here which are betting with those kinds of odds that has already achieve a long term success?
You understand that everything depends on the player, if he is able to win more often than lose, then he will have a profit.
But I would like to ask, why exactly the coefficient of 1.9 was taken, why not 2, or 3? )
In fact, you can substitute different odds, but what is more important is not odds (although this also matters), but your statistics of winning bets in the long term. Every player who wants to earn money in gambling should keep statistics of each bet to see how much he managed to win. Let's say how much he managed to win from 100 bets? This is a good enough number to understand how successful you are as a player and, accordingly, you can calculate your success with different odds. And then only calculations, if you can win 60 bets out of 100, then there is a chance to be with a profit, if more than half of the bets are losing, then either you need to increase the odds, and try again, or it will not be easy for you to earn money on bets.