Topic: [19GH/s] Project X | 115% return | 0 Fee | Risk | GetWork | 2 slots available! (Read 39347 times)
February 25, 2013, 10:15:55 AM
I snet him a PM offered to double his hashrate, haven't heard a peep.
February 23, 2013, 07:48:39 PM
No stats updated for the 22nd or 23rd - not liking the way this is going...
Glad I stopped mining on the 21st...
Glad I stopped mining on the 21st...
February 22, 2013, 10:10:58 AM
Payouts are my issues - 2+ days behind so I have jumped off. Haven't heard back yet but know he isn't on the forums often...
February 22, 2013, 09:14:54 AM
I lost about a day of mining on Bitlc.net, so that was the main driver of the rate decrease. I am going to try and keep it at 115% until we get buffered up, then I can payout out a better bonus.
Very smooth for last few days, hope we have a good run(and luck) and we got the buffered up.
February 18, 2013, 06:05:23 AM
115% works for me 
February 17, 2013, 08:54:27 PM
I lost about a day of mining on Bitlc.net, so that was the main driver of the rate decrease. I am going to try and keep it at 115% until we get buffered up, then I can payout out a better bonus.
Great question!
Great question!
February 15, 2013, 03:51:59 PM
Any idea where the bonus rate will settle?
February 10, 2013, 03:07:27 PM
Sorry guys, I am not sure what the problem with the hash rate graphs crashing has been. Since they just pull data, when the database crashed it shows a massive spike up or down. That will go away in a few days but you can get the data by mousing over a data point.
Good news is that I have been working on a stratum pool back-end and a opensource front-end. So, I can aggregate the data in a better place.
The current hash rate graphs are custom and have been donated and managed for free. Stability issues are usually caused by windows...arrgh.
Update: I had some router issues. Stable now...please come back.
Good news is that I have been working on a stratum pool back-end and a opensource front-end. So, I can aggregate the data in a better place.
The current hash rate graphs are custom and have been donated and managed for free. Stability issues are usually caused by windows...arrgh.
Update: I had some router issues. Stable now...please come back.
February 08, 2013, 01:34:04 PM
Yeah - the graphs never seem to work more than a day or two without breaking...
February 08, 2013, 01:24:06 PM
Ahh - didn't know it was back - seemed to be down for a while (per the graphs).
Share are being submitted but graphs say "Incomplete JSON object."
February 08, 2013, 12:15:29 PM
Ahh - didn't know it was back - seemed to be down for a while (per the graphs).
February 08, 2013, 12:01:45 PM
Seems to be down. Can't connect and stats haven't updated since last night.
EDIT: Never mind, started working the instant I complained.
EDIT: Never mind, started working the instant I complained.
February 07, 2013, 02:32:07 AM
added 2 fpga lancelot, at first it was ok, but about (6pm utc+2) it started to throw HW errors, 6x times more than usual
reject rate looks fine : 4890 24 0.49%
reject rate looks fine : 4890 24 0.49%
I have been working on it all day. Stable AFAIK since 1am GMT-6.
Code:
cgminer version 2.10.4 - Started: [2013-02-04 23:56:42]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):834.9M (avg):849.3Mh/s | Q:17813 A:34325 R:925 HW:0 E:193% U:11.6/m
ST: 1 SS: 32 DW: 290 NB: 316 LW: 38293 GF: 0 RF: 21 WU: 11.9
Connected to 192.168.1.11 diff 1 with LP as user OC-PC
Block: 03862d25a4eec365... Diff:3.27M Started: [01:24:06] Best share: 14K
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 82.5C 3265RPM | 374.3M/369.9Mh/s | A:14830 R:442 HW:0 U: 4.99/m I: 5
GPU 1: 87.5C 4019RPM | 311.4M/305.1Mh/s | A:12469 R:297 HW:0 U: 4.20/m I: 9
GPU 2: 73.0C | 177.4M/174.3Mh/s | A: 7026 R:186 HW:0 U: 2.37/m I: 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-02-07 01:25:52] Accepted 65dd4b6e Diff 2/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:26:30] Accepted 1135133d Diff 14/1 GPU 1 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:26:46] Accepted 4f30977d Diff 3/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:26:52] Accepted e94ab457 Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:04] Accepted 7660620d Diff 2/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:06] Accepted f562f09d Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:06] Accepted 82d63b6e Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:10] Accepted 5aeb3ef5 Diff 2/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:10] Accepted 4efe5f40 Diff 3/1 GPU 1 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:11] Accepted 9c4d9194 Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 0
[2013-02-07 01:27:20] Accepted 6cb5f5a9 Diff 2/1 GPU 1 pool 0
Code:
cgminer.exe -o 192.168.1.11:8999 -u OC-PC -p yourmamma -g 1 -I d,9,9 --auto-fan --gpu-engine 865,990,880 --gpu-memclock 480,350,300 --gpu-powertune 20,20,20 --temp-target 80,80,80 --temp-overheat 90,90,90 --temp-cutoff 95,95,95 -k diablo -w 128,256,128 -v 2 --failover-only 2>logfile.txt --sharelog share.log
February 07, 2013, 02:10:00 AM
added 2 fpga lancelot, at first it was ok, but about (6pm utc+2) it started to throw HW errors, 6x times more than usual
reject rate looks fine : 4890 24 0.49%
reject rate looks fine : 4890 24 0.49%
February 06, 2013, 11:49:47 AM
If you read the thread a while back, I tried to diversify where our hashes go to lower risk and maintain regular payments. Well, my solution is also our problem. Long run, I have to experiment and find a better proxy for the back end. For now, I will continue to try and alleviate bottle necks. I fixed two this morning (fixed as in undid my previous "fix")
When moving hashes to ProjectX, please scale up slowly if adding over 2 ghs at a time and please provide/ 
feedback.
When moving hashes to ProjectX, please scale up slowly if adding over 2 ghs at a time and please provide
/ feedback. February 05, 2013, 12:13:53 PM
Brilliant ICE!
February 04, 2013, 12:46:30 PM
It looks like you're only using the default two threads per device.
Try lowering intensity to 6 and increasing threads to 3.
That keeps more work queued up and the GPUs constantly busy.
EDIT: Don't lower intensity, 7 is perfect that MHPS range. Just add another thread.
February 02, 2013, 07:48:02 PM
Try again and keep mining, I know the problem and have bypassed it. Otherwise, thanks for testing and providing feedback
February 02, 2013, 04:58:06 PM
Been running well the last few days...
Glad to hear that! I will be watching it for most of the day.
Today is a good day for those who want to give it a try. I have a small buffer now, so there won't be a delay on payments. Make sure to move hashes over evenly, helps keep a steady reliable hash rate.
Current miners are GPU or BFL Singles. If you use BFL or CGminer with the --failover-only option, you should get decent results. Otherwise, I am happy to help anyone off-line via GTALK or Skype
Jump to: