1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM - page 23.

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:59:04 PM

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:48:43 PM

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:30:36 PM

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?

runeks

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:48:43 PM

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:30:36 PM

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.

Jutarul

donator

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

Let's see how long he's playing the masses Grin

Ziyonex

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:50:32 PM

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion Grin

This is gonna be a long night Wink

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Nuoooomy god.

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion Grin

This is gonna be a long night Wink

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:30:36 PM

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

MrGaSp

sr. member

Activity: 418

Merit: 253

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:30:36 PM

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

I am completely glued to this: http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/

Jutarul

donator

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:30:36 PM

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Yes. Through the floor! Somebody is going to buy back at a loss!

runeks

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1008

^ Good to know.

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 01:20:03 PM

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Raoul Duke

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1002

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:03:29 PM

Quote from: mb300sd on August 19, 2012, 12:53:52 PM

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 12:50:52 PM

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Disable the advanced view at the bottom of the page

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

Yes it does support sending them from the GUI

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

mb300sd

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 01:03:29 PM

Quote from: mb300sd on August 19, 2012, 12:53:52 PM

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 12:50:52 PM

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

At the very bottom:

Advanced: Enable

runeks

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1008

Quote from: mb300sd on August 19, 2012, 12:53:52 PM

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 12:50:52 PM

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

Jutarul

donator

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

Anyway we reached the trust floor ($8-$9). It's shopping time!

Raoul Duke

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1002

Quote from: mb300sd on August 19, 2012, 12:53:52 PM

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 12:50:52 PM

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

A sendmany transaction lol

mb300sd

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts

Quote from: Spekulatius on August 19, 2012, 12:50:52 PM

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

Yuhfhrh

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: Jutarul on August 19, 2012, 12:40:31 PM

Lol. I guess it was the perfect bluff.

Use 5k BTC to tear down a wall. Then use 100k BTC to scare the shit out of everybody and make them panic sell. He didn't have to spend a single BTC of the 100k. Grin

Lol at whoever has this address

Jutarul

donator

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

Lol. I guess it was the perfect bluff.

Use 5k BTC to tear down a wall. Then use 100k BTC to scare the shit out of everybody and make them panic sell. He didn't have to spend a single BTC of the 100k. Grin

salty

full member

Activity: 562

Merit: 100

Quote from: runeks on August 19, 2012, 11:56:36 AM

Quote from: Raoul Duke on August 18, 2012, 08:17:55 PM

Wrong. It costed a big fat zero.
The 0.01022427 value is the change lol
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/16394734/d2f25503cf1ddf56c65635d449b17c72c32e696cd7f4fca1aeb94392675f19ba

Quote

Fees 0 BTC

Or maybe he sent 0.01022427 BTC and 100,000 BTC is the change...

Well that would be a cheap way to try fuelling the dip, wouldn't it!

Topic: 1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM - page 23. (Read 85797 times)