Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.
We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.
If you do not accept negative feedback accounts in your campaign, you will not be able to find new participants. Because if someone applies in your campaign only then that account will get negative feedback. So no reputed member would dare to apply considering this risk.
i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam
This is certainly a matter of concern. Even though DT members are giving negative feedback, members are joining this campaign at the risk of their own account. Since there are a lot of complaints against this website and more new players may be deceived because of this signature campaign, I think more effective steps should be taken to stop this campaign than randomly tagging the participants of 1xbit signature campaign.
