Do you agree on his points about this, you can watch it here: https://x.com/ClutchPoints/status/1884742335843754349
~
It will be a huge change for the NBA itself, but being a fan since the Jordan era, I do not like what Adam is putting here, doesn't make sense just to be consistent with the TV habits?
It's debatable. On the one hand, reducing the time of quarters to 10 minutes has a positive effect in that it will noticeably reduce the stress on the players during a regular season, and, consequently, some players won't be so injury-prone as it is now. On the other hand, 12-minute quarters are what has always distinguished the NBA from other leagues. It also gives more opportunities for some players to showcase themselves on the court and for teams to score a lot of points per game.
I don’t like this idea at all. It will change basically all of the statistics and make it so that future players won’t be compared nearly the same as those that came before them. I say rather than try to shorten the games (if this is about player safety) they should shorten the season down to 75 games and get rid of back to backs. That way per game averages aren’t effected while players that have 20+ year careers aren’t blowing away all the old heads in career stats.