Pages:
Author

Topic: 215 posts merited (by me) in just over 3 minutes–What’s got over me? (v 44.0) - page 5. (Read 3459 times)

legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
This is a good idea I have 323 merits still sitting I will go back to people I gave 1 merit and bump them.
hero member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 960
100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!
It seems like you are taking theymos words that he would rather you use all of your smerit than only a few of it each month. Would you care to tell us how much smerit you get a month?
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1794
Top Crypto Casino
<...>
According to what he said, it seems to me like he did it manually. He probably just visited his sent merit summary page. Clicked on each link and sent merit   Cheesy
I’m still stretching my fingers after going on a merit awarding streak, having just merited 250 people with a single merit in just over an hour. Have I gone bonkers? No more than I may already be …
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Sorry to bump up this thread, but I got here (again) because of referenced on another post.
How did you send the merits?
1. Some kind of script? Fully automated?
2. Did you prepare the transactions in a text file, and then copied in the browser to actually merit?
3. Did you open 250 tabs in your browser?

Just a little bit curious.
I could easily do number 2, so i guess you went with the fully automated process.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1080
I've got a big stockpile of personal merit right now and might go do the same. It seems that I get merit in bursts for certain posts rather than having them come in steady. Probably because I don't post all that often and generally at least attempt to make one informative post per week which I think will be appreciated  by the community and would benefit the community.

I've got around 20 sMerit right now which I think I need to go and empty! I was one of the 250 that you merited too so thanks!
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 629
Vires in Numeris
I’m still stretching my fingers after going on a merit awarding streak, having just merited 250 people with a single merit in just over an hour.

I was one of those 250 people. Thanks for awarding my post 👍
Me too, thanks very much for that extra merit Smiley
You know, every single merit counts if someone is heading to the next rank Cheesy
If I merit one of your posts from now on, I'll become a merit backscratcher? Tongue
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 12
You chose  smart, intelligent, tested (the posts already checked by you), easiest and fast way to offload your merits.   Grin  That too in just 1 hour and 2 minutes.
Worked like Santa of 25th December distributing not just rewards but joy to so many people in just a short time.
Nice job giving happiness to 250 profiles.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
The moment I received merit from you for an old post you have previously merited I was surprised I thought it was a bug or something and had to check you merit history and saw you did the same thing to everyone else.  Your present was really missed for the few days you were away. With this act I guess you're fully back. welcome back DdmrDdmr.

Someone was enjoying your absent, you got some catching up to do.
Cheesy DdmrDdmr is quite busy lately IRL, so that gives me a fighting chance. For now Cheesy
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
What I then did was award 1 sMerit to the last post I had merited for each of those...
Been there, done that Cool
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
P.S: I think I'm one of the 250 people you've chosen to Merit since I received a Merit from you for quite an old post.

I also noticed that, I was thinking back earlier for I have seen that my Merits has been gone to 161, whenever I get one I always check who gave me that and for what post of mine, as I looked into my Merit history it was DdmrDdmr giving Merit to my Activity Tips on Ranking again.



Anyways thanks, only 89 left before I got to the next League. Tongue and also I don't even think awarding Merits in just one day is an issue here, it would be if you're handling it into the wrong accounts.

Is it the end of the world for DdmrDdmr? Huh Tongue (Just Joking)

The strategy followed by suchmoon and Vod seems to be the best; Give 4 or more sMerits when you find a good post. So they never let them accumulate too much, and they do not need to plan a new strategy to distribute them. =)


Yeah, I also never received 1 Merit from Vod maybe the lowest is 2 or 3. Even if it's just lucky troll.
hero member
Activity: 908
Merit: 657
This is probably the low point of my Bitcointalk career, can’t even make the top 250  Embarrassed
copper member
Activity: 252
Merit: 6
I’m still stretching my fingers after going on a merit awarding streak, having just merited 250 people with a single merit in just over an hour.

I was one of those 250 people. Thanks for awarding my post 👍
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 6581
be constructive or S.T.F.U
and I find I actively have to refrain from meriting good posts by users who don't "need" the merit like suchmoon, The Pharmacist, LoyceV, etc, so I still have some available to send to non legendary members who deserve to rank up.

I am not sure if i should use the word need, but i am pretty certain these guys would wan't more merit ( each have their own purpose), it's never enough, the more you get the more you want, it's like drugs for self-achievements.


but to be honest,i most of the time tend to search for low rank members to merit too  Grin
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 611

I was very surprised when I saw today that you dug a post that I wrote a few months ago and rewarded it with merit (especially that it was quietly drowning in the depths of the meta section ;-)).

Only now after reading this thread I understood what happened ;-)
Anyway thanks...
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
-snip-
I do try. Smiley

All five of those users are indeed merit sources, which you can see by comparing how much merit they have sent (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topsendat) and how much they have earned. My merit source allocation is very low*, and I find I actively have to refrain from meriting good posts by users who don't "need" the merit like suchmoon, The Pharmacist, LoyceV, etc, so I still have some available to send to non legendary members who deserve to rank up.



*Is it cheeky to ask for boost already? I've only been a merit source for a month, but I used up all my source sMerits in about 6 days, and now I'm on my last 1 or 2 of my own sMerits too.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
I came to consider multiple criteria:

-   LMFR (last merited by me, first re-merited)
-   FMFR (first merited by me, first re-merited)
-   Proportional to the amount of sMerit I’ve sent in the past to each profile
-   Proportional to the amount of sMerit TXs I’ve sent in the past to each profile
-   Flat merit per merited profile.
I wish I was this much of a math-head, but when it comes to giving merits it never seems to need that much analysis.  A post either reaches the threshold of being worthy of merit or it doesn't (in my mind at least), though I could exactly describe how a post meets that threshold.  Anyway, good for you for spreading the love around.  If you've got that many sMerits and are a source, it's definitely best if you get rid of them.  Seems like there's not too many members ranking up lately, and I'm pretty sure at least some of them deserve to but are being held up by the merit requirement.

Sounds complicated, i simply merit posts based on the quality and member rank (i set lower quality standard for lower rank)
Exactly.  I even agree about the bar being lowered for the lower ranks, although I haven't lowered it too much.  When it comes to deciding whether to merit a Newbie or Jr. Member who hasn't earned any merits previously, I'm always reluctant and have to make sure they're not plagiarizing or putting all their effort into a single 'merit-bait' post, after which they'll resume a life of shitposting.  Above Jr. Member rank, I tend to do less checking and there's less hesitation on my part.  I just wish there were more good posts being made by those lower-ranked members.  Every time I go looking for the buried nuggets, I end up finding other crap instead and I get extremely sidetracked.
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 395
I am alive but in hibernation.
Oh, I thought that you might be reading so old post in B&H board when I received merit for that post . After reading OP it just made realized that there is indeed a very long gap since I last received  merit from you.

You have no need to justify yourself because you are clearly  following the below directive from theymos

It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.

----snipped----
I appreciate the work of you and other sources who take it seriously!

This is an eccentric but efficient way to offload available smerits. And as you've previously merited the posts in question, you are sure it is up to your standards of deserving posts. And depending on how many merits users has racked up in the interval, you can check the growth of the account.

For me it is at least  the gap of more than 174+, because I was member having less than 100 Merits at that time.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 29
This is an eccentric but efficient way to offload available smerits. And as you've previously merited the posts in question, you are sure it is up to your standards of deserving posts. And depending on how many merits users has racked up in the interval, you can check the growth of the account.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1794
Top Crypto Casino
I saw the re-merit today and thought you had done it by mistake  Grin
Otherwise, your inspiration towards low ranked members doesn't go unnoticed.

During the time I have been posting here through my newbie rank to member rank. I couldn't help but recognize that the following members (am not sure whether they are all merit sources) take their time patrol through a majority of boards and are not so stingy when it comes to awarding merit even to lower ranked members so long as the post is good.
- DdmrDdmr
- o_e_l_e_o
- suchmoon
- dbshck
- Foxpup

There could be others but these are the ones that got much more noticed
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The strategy followed by suchmoon and Vod seems to be the best; Give 4 or more sMerits when you find a good post. So they never let them accumulate too much, and they do not need to plan a new strategy to distribute them. =)

DdmrDdmr is doing the same thing here, just retroactively.

If I had to do something like this I would probably sort the list by how many merits the recipients have sent out and reward most active ones first.
Pages:
Jump to: