Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 371. (Read 4382840 times)
March 10, 2014, 05:48:59 PM
Any idea why the website is showing ~30,000 MH/s for my 3 antminer S1's, rather than the expect ~200,000MH/s. The Antminers are showing the correct hash rate.
March 10, 2014, 05:46:18 PM
No, there is a calculation error or something. It was my usual proportion of work. I got ripped off on the payout. I've switched pools for the time being. Not cool.
So, slush creates the very first ever mining pool to scam a single newbie 3 or 4 years later from a few micro BTC... This is clearly a slush problem and not your own...
Who said it was a scam, dipshit?
When you said you were ripped off...
Being "ripped off" doesn't necessitate intentionality, at least not when used in this part of the Anglosphere. Forgive me for snapping -- this is frustrating. I submitted a ticket.
Forgiven for calling me a dipshit - not been called that for ages
[edit] It takes a while to get your miners stable when you start - and it is frustrating but if you see it through then you become a 'miner'.
March 10, 2014, 05:33:57 PM
No, there is a calculation error or something. It was my usual proportion of work. I got ripped off on the payout. I've switched pools for the time being. Not cool.
So, slush creates the very first ever mining pool to scam a single newbie 3 or 4 years later from a few micro BTC... This is clearly a slush problem and not your own...
Who said it was a scam, dipshit?
When you said you were ripped off...
Being "ripped off" doesn't necessitate intentionality, at least not when used in this part of the Anglosphere. Forgive me for snapping -- this is frustrating. I submitted a ticket.
March 10, 2014, 05:30:20 PM
No, there is a calculation error or something. It was my usual proportion of work. I got ripped off on the payout. I've switched pools for the time being. Not cool.
So, slush creates the very first ever mining pool to scam a single newbie 3 or 4 years later from a few micro BTC... This is clearly a slush problem and not your own...
Who said it was a scam, dipshit?
When you said you were ripped off...
March 10, 2014, 05:04:59 PM
No, there is a calculation error or something. It was my usual proportion of work. I got ripped off on the payout. I've switched pools for the time being. Not cool.
So, slush creates the very first ever mining pool to scam a single newbie 3 or 4 years later from a few micro BTC... This is clearly a slush problem and not your own...
March 10, 2014, 05:02:00 PM
No, there is a calculation error or something. It was my usual proportion of work. I got ripped off on the payout. I've switched pools for the time being. Not cool.
March 10, 2014, 04:18:23 PM
21794 2014-03-10 08:11:42 3:21:07 2512348484 20667 0.00000000 289844 25.05346277 74 confirmations left 
Compare your proportion of shares to total share in this block to adjacent blocks that you mined (20667/2512348484 for this block). If this is significantly lower for this block, it would give you a clue what happened (you lost hashing or internet connection towards the end of this block, and were 'punished' by Slush's 'anti-hopping' method). It could have been some internet connectivity problem to Slush's pool which is beyond your control.My reward for this block was within the normal range.
Cheers
March 10, 2014, 02:21:34 PM
21794 2014-03-10 08:11:42 3:21:07 2512348484 20667 0.00000000 289844 25.05346277 74 confirmations left
There must have been a connection down.
My payout is up.
March 10, 2014, 12:45:52 PM
21794 2014-03-10 08:11:42 3:21:07 2512348484 20667 0.00000000 289844 25.05346277 74 confirmations left
I miss the drama here ;(
March 10, 2014, 12:39:24 PM
21794 2014-03-10 08:11:42 3:21:07 2512348484 20667 0.00000000 289844 25.05346277 74 confirmations left
Something is very wrong. I got cheated also -- I really hope this gets fixed.
March 10, 2014, 07:16:06 AM
21794 2014-03-10 08:11:42 3:21:07 2512348484 20667 0.00000000 289844 25.05346277 74 confirmations left
March 09, 2014, 11:58:52 PM
The first reaction to your original posting, just next to it, was this KNK's very good insight, with an advice to check your side first. You did not. That's all. Nothing more to be added.
For what it is worth I totally missed that post. Either way seeing that or from my brief exchange with Slush support the root cause was found by me, and I did contrary to what you believe. Deal with it or continue to be a dick. Nothing more to be added.
You have completely messed up the quotations in your post above. "Your" text is mine and the "mine" one is yours.
The root cause has been found by both KNK and by Slush, not by you. Instead of you. That's the problem you haven't admitted.
I'm only writing about what had been written here, nothing of it depeds on my "belief". Others can see who is the dick.
March 09, 2014, 10:21:23 PM
The first reaction to your original posting, just next to it, was this KNK's very good insight, with an advice to check your side first. You did not. That's all. Nothing more to be added.
For what it is worth I totally missed that post. Either way seeing that or from my brief exchange with Slush support the root cause was found by me, and I did contrary to what you believe. Deal with it or continue to be a dick. Nothing more to be added.
March 09, 2014, 04:16:24 PM
First, you should probably have had a look at your logs and not send any support e-mail. When you haven't done so, you could at least have read the answer here in the forum that had answered your question thoroughly, and you would have no need to send any support request. But if you would have done the best thing yourself, i.e. look at the logs, there would be no need to post any question in this forum on the topic that had been answered many, many times, and make the members read it again and again...
First you should probably get a grip on typical human nature. Someone looking at stats where I show plenty of shares but no payout looks like something happened at the pool to me at first, and I argue to anyone else looking at the same thing. "members read it again and again..." will continue just as it has, you can bet on it. But the more intelligent of us are most likely to get to the root cause whereas the remainder say Slush is ripping us off and move on.
The first reaction to your original posting, just next to it, was this KNK's very good insight, with an advice to check your side first. You did not. That's all. Nothing more to be added.
March 09, 2014, 02:17:14 PM
This current round is becoming a planet killer. 
March 09, 2014, 11:29:51 AM
First, you should probably have had a look at your logs and not send any support e-mail. When you haven't done so, you could at least have read the answer here in the forum that had answered your question thoroughly, and you would have no need to send any support request. But if you would have done the best thing yourself, i.e. look at the logs, there would be no need to post any question in this forum on the topic that had been answered many, many times, and make the members read it again and again...
First you should probably get a grip on typical human nature. Someone looking at stats where I show plenty of shares but no payout looks like something happened at the pool to me at first, and I argue to anyone else looking at the same thing. "members read it again and again..." will continue just as it has, you can bet on it. But the more intelligent of us are most likely to get to the root cause whereas the remainder say Slush is ripping us off and move on.
March 09, 2014, 10:07:04 AM
Wow that is great! 915TH. Congrats to the pool even though I left just before the bad luck streak. I always keep Slush on my mind and frequently check stats.
BTC
BTC March 09, 2014, 08:20:12 AM
Over 900TH/s
Well, lets hope we get a few sub 1 hour blocks to disprove the conspiracy theorists (they know who they are!) March 09, 2014, 07:04:14 AM
Over 900TH/s
March 08, 2014, 08:38:13 PM
nice to see the intelligent conversation to whining ratio has improved
Jump to: