Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
I got a payout yesterday at 19:00 UTC but it took a little longer than usual. I did NOT get an email notification. Kind of an obvious question but, did you check the payout history? 
Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 680. (Read 4382714 times)
June 04, 2013, 07:20:17 AM
June 04, 2013, 07:05:55 AM
Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
Checked you junk mail folder?
Yeah and I had the email re-sent several times. Is your payout working ok?
Maybe yeah - I don't know whether my payout is working as I have it set to 1 bitcoin and I'm only half way there...
June 04, 2013, 06:59:45 AM
Recent luck attracts more users? 12 GH/s now
Slush went up from 8% of total network hashrate to 10%
In ideal conditions more = better
But will it blend? (server loads)
Luck makes pool look bigger also... Speed is estimated. Pool doesn't ask users what is there speed. It estimate it based on shares. Same goes for network share. If pool is lucky it will get bigger...Slush went up from 8% of total network hashrate to 10%
In ideal conditions more = better
But will it blend? (server loads)
interesting, but now 12.x Gh/s and 97% luck.. Maybe more pool user understand how great the Slush's pool is
June 04, 2013, 06:59:36 AM
Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
Checked you junk mail folder?
Yeah and I had the email re-sent several times. Is your payout working ok?
June 04, 2013, 06:18:16 AM
Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
Checked you junk mail folder?
Yeah and I had the email re-sent several times. Is your payout working ok?
June 04, 2013, 05:32:05 AM
Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
Checked you junk mail folder?
June 04, 2013, 05:29:06 AM
Are payouts and email broken for anyone else? My reward has almost doubled my threshold but hasn't been sent and I have been trying to change my payment address but never get the verification email.
June 04, 2013, 04:52:03 AM
I believe that block 18373 is a compensation for the missed block mentioned earlier.
But inserting a fake two second block in the statistics makes the overall pool luck value increase for the following period of time... :-)
But inserting a fake two second block in the statistics makes the overall pool luck value increase for the following period of time... :-)
No it is not, because i have no shares for that round, while i have for the round before and also had for the missing block (both before and after i.e. no downtime)
June 04, 2013, 04:37:19 AM
I believe that block 18373 is a compensation for the missed block mentioned earlier.
But inserting a fake two second block in the statistics makes the overall pool luck value increase for the following period of time... :-)
But inserting a fake two second block in the statistics makes the overall pool luck value increase for the following period of time... :-)
June 04, 2013, 04:20:46 AM
I'm noticing a significant fluctuation in shorter blocks. On the order of ~30% smaller rewards only on shorter blocks, but not all of them. I don't know if these are miscalculations or if people are getting lucky with some sort of pool hopping guesswork
This would be normal if your hash rate is rather low (less than 100-200MH/s). At about 1GH the variation for me is usually less than 10% (short or bonus).
In essence - it has to do with the way this pool pays rewards - the reward is based on the score, and score decreases exponentially with older shares. If you manage to submit shares in the last second when the block is found - your score will be the highest (for those shares) and you may get extra few %, and vice versa - if your last share is over a minute older when the block is found - that share would bring you a lower %.
June 04, 2013, 02:06:56 AM
...but most of the miners are sending their hashrate anyway, then the problem is that the value can not be trusted so the pool should either confirm the value or ignore it completely with the second being easier.
Thanks, didn't know that...regardless. if you say the hashrate going from 10543.740 Ghash/s 2 weeks ago to 11543.740 Ghash/s is because of luck then you are declaring ALL miners are having increased luck which is not how probability works. Cluster performance looks like it is showing the actual hashrate to the assumed hashrate. for example 2 of my 6 miners are presently lower than their normal hashrate, one is well above and the last 3 are dead on.
Now the pool is hitting 12543.740 Ghash/s a week after it when up 1000 gh/s it has gone up another 1000 gh/s. the only answer has to be that 1000 gh/s of miners joined Slush 2 weeks ago and 1000 gh/s of miners joined this week.
All I know is every 1000 gh/s increase negates one of my miners grrr... I just added 2 to make up for the 1000 from 2 weeks ago!
Nah, not true. If all shares were D1 shares, you'd expect luck based variance of about +/- 0.5% over a minute at 10 Thps. Even if the average share difficulty was 32 (very unlikely) the luck based variance over one minute would be ~ +/- 3%. Edit: with 95% confidence.
June 04, 2013, 01:53:57 AM
...but most of the miners are sending their hashrate anyway, then the problem is that the value can not be trusted so the pool should either confirm the value or ignore it completely with the second being easier.
Thanks, didn't know that...regardless. if you say the hashrate going from 10543.740 Ghash/s 2 weeks ago to 11543.740 Ghash/s is because of luck then you are declaring ALL miners are having increased luck which is not how probability works. Cluster performance looks like it is showing the actual hashrate to the assumed hashrate. for example 2 of my 6 miners are presently lower than their normal hashrate, one is well above and the last 3 are dead on.
Now the pool is hitting 12543.740 Ghash/s a week after it when up 1000 gh/s it has gone up another 1000 gh/s. the only answer has to be that 1000 gh/s of miners joined Slush 2 weeks ago and 1000 gh/s of miners joined this week.
All I know is every 1000 gh/s increase negates one of my miners grrr... I just added 2 to make up for the 1000 from 2 weeks ago!
June 04, 2013, 01:42:20 AM
Where did get the hash of the invalid block?
Point over the link of the block number and it goes to http://blockchain.info/block/000000000000013590c203af0e0aac04c4cd10f1baaf98d44dcb0d67a9933b09?site=slush
June 04, 2013, 01:20:15 AM
Someone just got the exact same work as someone else, and they got it solved 2 secs apart from eachother.
Not the same work, but a work that also resulted in a solution - the hashes are different: The long one is 00000000000000687dc957f3ba6685aeb8f73dee7a48020caccc015115494fc8
and the 2sec one is 000000000000013590c203af0e0aac04c4cd10f1baaf98d44dcb0d67a9933b09
June 04, 2013, 01:14:39 AM
I'm noticing a significant fluctuation in shorter blocks. On the order of ~30% smaller rewards only on shorter blocks, but not all of them. I don't know if these are miscalculations or if people are getting lucky with some sort of pool hopping guesswork
This would be normal if your hash rate is rather low (less than 100-200MH/s). At about 1GH the variation for me is usually less than 10% (short or bonus).
In essence - it has to do with the way this pool pays rewards - the reward is based on the score, and score decreases exponentially with older shares. If you manage to submit shares in the last second when the block is found - your score will be the highest (for those shares) and you may get extra few %, and vice versa - if your last share is over a minute older when the block is found - that share would bring you a lower %.
June 04, 2013, 12:11:24 AM
I'm noticing a significant fluctuation in shorter blocks. On the order of ~30% smaller rewards only on shorter blocks, but not all of them. I don't know if these are miscalculations or if people are getting lucky with some sort of pool hopping guesswork
June 03, 2013, 11:23:56 PM
Someone just got the exact same work as someone else, and they got it solved 2 secs apart from eachother.
Not the same work, but a work that also resulted in a solution - the hashes are different: The long one is 00000000000000687dc957f3ba6685aeb8f73dee7a48020caccc015115494fc8
and the 2sec one is 000000000000013590c203af0e0aac04c4cd10f1baaf98d44dcb0d67a9933b09
June 03, 2013, 09:41:58 PM
The second "block" will end up being invalid..
June 03, 2013, 06:41:22 PM
18373 2013-06-03 22:57:34 0:00:02 16141 12 0.01845956 239570 25.23781000 95 confirmations left
18372 2013-06-03 22:57:32 1:18:06 13727369 9524 0.01714880 239570 25.23781000 95 confirmations left
Never seen that happen before. Oh, 2 second blocks are possible but pool has to be very luck for that to happen.
18372 2013-06-03 22:57:32 1:18:06 13727369 9524 0.01714880 239570 25.23781000 95 confirmations left
Never seen that happen before. Oh, 2 second blocks are possible but pool has to be very luck for that to happen.
June 03, 2013, 06:32:58 PM
Maybe that's the fix for the block we didn't get before.
I doubt that as 2 secs is way too short to be fair.Someone just got the exact same work as someone else, and they got it solved 2 secs apart from eachother.
Jump to: