Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 767. (Read 4382797 times)

Yes the calculations are off.  I submitted about 20x more shares and got 1/10883th of what you got.

17925    2013-05-08 14:13:44    1:27:14    11634278    22342    0.00000566    235160    25.21733124    74 confirmations left

Well, here is one answer that isn't hard to find...

Seems that's what happend with a few. Uneven distribution I guess. Some got really high, some got really low. Unless this is the "Luck" that so many have mentioned Lady luck shine on me!

hi all .

since the 06 may 13 , namecoin doesn't work . Do you know the reason

Block            trouvé le                   Durée              Block Block value    Validité
20461   2013-05-06 23:43:09   2 days, 7:31:03   109457 N/A    confirmé
20460   2013-05-04 16:12:04   2:14:17   109114   N/A    confirmé
20459   2013-05-04 13:57:45   8:14:33   109099   N/A    confirmé
20458   2013-05-04 05:43:09   4:57:23   109057   N/A    confirmé
20457   2013-05-04 00:45:44   19:16:02   109037   N/A    confirmé
20456   2013-05-03 05:29:40   21:59:50   108966   N/A    invalide
20455   2013-05-02 07:29:48   1 day, 20:18:01   108858   N/A    invalide
20454   2013-04-30 11:11:45   14:44:08   108559   N/A    confirmé
20453   2013-04-29 20:27:34   2 days, 9:47:55   108451   N/A    confirmé
20452   2013-04-27 10:39:37   5:59:23   108046   N/A    confirmé
20451   2013-04-27 04:40:12   1 day, 1:03:17   107995   N/A    confirmé
20450   2013-04-26 03:36:53   6:49:13   107820   N/A    confirmé
20449   2013-04-25 20:47:38   14:45:28   107767   N/A    confirmé
20448   2013-04-25 06:02:08   1 day, 18:19:12   107660   N/A    confirmé
20447   2013-04-23 11:42:50   3:33:33   107361   N/A    confirmé
20446   2013-04-23 08:09:15   17:10:10   107336   N/A    confirmé
20445   2013-04-22 14:59:03   8:53:48   107215   N/A    confirmé
20444   2013-04-22 06:05:12   8:41:15   107159   N/A    confirmé
20443   2013-04-21 21:23:54   7:08:42   107090   N/A    confirmé
20442   2013-04-21 14:15:10   0:02:34   107045   N/A    confirmé
20441   2013-04-21 14:12:34   2:26:21   107043   N/A    confirmé
20440   2013-04-21 11:46:11   4:01:41   107024   N/A    confirmé
20439   2013-04-21 07:44:28   19:24:10   106985   N/A    confirmé
20438   2013-04-20 12:20:16   14:54:48   106858   N/A    confirmé
20437   2013-04-19 21:25:26   7:24:29   106736   N/A    confirmé
20436   2013-04-19 14:00:55   6:25:53   106672   N/A    confirmé
20435   2013-04-19 07:35:00   4:31:29   106625   N/A    confirmé
20434   2013-04-19 03:03:29   1:48:13   106593   N/A    confirmé
20433   2013-04-19 01:15:14   6:07:33   106581   N/A    confirmé
20432   2013-04-18 19:07:39   0:38:40   106543   N/A    confirmé

I'm going ot be honest I think I got paid too much on the block that you guys are all talking about unless I did indeed earn what I did because a bunch of other shares didn't make it in mine seems to be a bit high.  help us Obiwan (slush).

17925  2013-05-08 14:13:44 1:27:14   11634278  1107    0.06159829    235160    25.21733124  74 confirmations left

Sorry mate, I thought you'd take the comment as "tongue-in-cheek" as it was intended.

Looking back now, I can laugh at the irony that posting about posts that are not what the thread was for is in itself not what the thread is for. I'm sure you can. 

Yea, if your search terms are right.  And then once you find the question, track down the answer, which may or may not be mixed in with three to five other conversations.

I'm saying, this is not the most efficient way to handle discussion about a range of topics with one central theme.  An out of the box forum would do just fine.  I'd even volunteer to throw one up if someone has a domain they want to host it on.  It's honestly like 5 hours total worth of work to get set up.  Moderating, filtering now may be more cumbersome, but Slush's pool is pretty popular.  I think it may be time to at least look into a standalone forum.

I was on my tablet and truthfully I didn't read... So I am the dumbass :-))

TiborB I appreciate the link :-) I will read it.

So... disregard my question as it was here for some time ;-)

Did you at least try to read the last few posts before asking?

Cheers,
   T

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

doh

One question...

Why I have so small reward for this block ?



Normally should be around 0.00097 BTC ... minus the fee (I didn't extract the fee for easy calculus)

25.21 BTC / 11634278 = 2.16 x 10-6 x 452 = 9.79 x 10-4 = 0.000979 BTC

Search.  That's what it's there for.  No one expects you to wade through 380 pages.  But with 3 clicks most questions can be answered.

Problems here too with block 17925

17925   2013-05-08 14:13:44   1:27:14   11634278   74   0.00000003   235160   25.21733124    80 confirmations left

Perhaps it would be useful if Slush or someone "in the know" could say if everyone having a problem with this block needs to reply on the thread, or if the whole block has problems and it'll get sorted and no one else needs to post. That would probably stop loads of pages of "I've got a problem with 17925" posts...

The 16% extra is not from Bitminter. The person quoting the original data posted results from another pool which merge mines more than just namecoin. For Bitminter it would be the namecoin % only which was 8%.

Ditto. Problems here as well.

17925    2013-05-08 14:13:44    1:27:14    11634278    9529    0.00000243    235160    25.21733124    84 confirmations left

Having the same problem with that block's reward:

17925   2013-05-08 14:13:44   1:27:14   11634278   791   0.00000019

Me three, 17926 also looks slightly fishy to me.

17926   2013-05-08 16:05:44   1:52:00   15071549   641   0.00043981   235165   25.59585000    89 confirmations left
17925   2013-05-08 14:13:44   1:27:14   11634278   488   0.00000013   235160   25.21733124    84 confirmations left

+1.  There are tons of free forum plugins /standalone systems out there.  Phorum for php comes to mind.  380 pages of posts is daunting and most of it usually irrelevant to the topic at hand, which is generally the last 3 or 4 pages.  Telling someone to wade through 380 pages of "Is the forum down?" to answer their question seems a bit harsh.

Exactly.  Which is looking like a problem with the pool.  Which is exactly what this thread is for, pertinent pool related conversation.

I didn't repeat a question that has been answered 50 times already.  And I didn't make a random comment about something completely unrelated.  I used the thread for what it was designed for.

Something may have happened near the end of the block.  I've got a few still doing proxy through ap2 so I may have got some shares in when others were having issues. Even 5 minutes down is enough to cause that issue.