I'm changing the fee structure to encourage people to use higher difficulties.
I haven't made this take effect yet but probably will today or tomorrow.
Topic: [500 GH/s]HHTT -Selected Diff/Stratum/PPLNS/Paid Stales/High Availability/Tor - page 29. (Read 56478 times)
September 08, 2012, 11:04:49 AM
I'm changing the fee structure to encourage people to use higher difficulties.
I haven't made this take effect yet but probably will today or tomorrow.
September 08, 2012, 09:40:59 AM
Just so other users know - stales are NOT paid -- need to consider this when evaluating the 2% fee.
With most PPS pools paying for stales I was surprised this pool is not - hence the post...
With most PPS pools paying for stales I was surprised this pool is not - hence the post...
September 08, 2012, 09:31:55 AM
There is a process that goes through and calculates values and puts them in the DB. My guess is that it isn't running. I'll check on that. You'll get credit for them all.
That server was litterally turned off by a cat last night. It will be up very soon and processing will resume.
September 08, 2012, 09:27:50 AM
Why was I getting nothing for many valid shares? 
There is a process that goes through and calculates values and puts them in the DB. My guess is that it isn't running. I'll check on that. You'll get credit for them all.
September 08, 2012, 07:29:15 AM
Looking at the spreadsheet that was in the thread back a bit it seems short of a MR (25 Gh/s) there isn't much reason to use 32diff for now.
That said, the MR is purring right now - WU of 353 (346-348 is more normal for me on 1diff).
That said, the MR is purring right now - WU of 353 (346-348 is more normal for me on 1diff).
September 08, 2012, 03:52:50 AM
Why was I getting nothing for many valid shares?
September 08, 2012, 12:42:51 AM
I've been mining here for a week now, no noticed downtime and I've been paid for every share. Good work 
September 07, 2012, 02:11:44 AM
Tried to subscribe to:
arn:aws:sns:us-west-2:615289640696:hhtt-block
but get "Topic does not exist" error. Did you set the topic to be Public on AWS?
Yeah, permissions should be set correctly. Note it is in us-west-2 so you have to use the Oregon region. If you try it from us-east-1 (default) you are likely to get that not found error.
September 05, 2012, 06:24:57 PM
Payments seem to be working again. I was curious what difficulty people were using, so I calculated it out.... fractional difficulties are from people that changed their mind or experimented with different ones:
I also calculated the average share price.
I also calculated the average share price.
11.3344 Diff ohhh yeah ! I'll settle on one eventually
Still playing with them. September 05, 2012, 03:34:53 PM
Payments seem to be working again. I was curious what difficulty people were using, so I calculated it out.... fractional difficulties are from people that changed their mind or experimented with different ones:
I also calculated the average share price.
I also calculated the average share price.
September 05, 2012, 07:54:54 AM
Payments seem to have stopped? Is the hourly script still running?
September 04, 2012, 09:38:15 AM
Tried to subscribe to:
arn:aws:sns:us-west-2:615289640696:hhtt-block
but get "Topic does not exist" error. Did you set the topic to be Public on AWS?
September 04, 2012, 12:17:40 AM
Any chance we are going to see merged mining in the future?
September 03, 2012, 03:59:22 PM
I was getting over paid for about 30 mins 
.
http://hhtt.1209k.com/user-details.php?user=1DPJHpt2hBNNumXqErSzw4r5SzFk9yL5X2
I got 0.00071569 per 32 difficulty share found instead of 0.00064245.
Any reason why?
.http://hhtt.1209k.com/user-details.php?user=1DPJHpt2hBNNumXqErSzw4r5SzFk9yL5X2
I got 0.00071569 per 32 difficulty share found instead of 0.00064245.
Any reason why?
Only explanation I can come up with was blockexplorer temporarily reporting the wrong difficulty. I should use the local bitcoind for that number.
I have seen this issue twice. Don't rush to fix though... should be called a feature rather than a bug.
September 03, 2012, 03:55:00 PM
I'm currently using Phoenix 2.0.
So do you have any recommend about best miner software for your pool?
So do you have any recommend about best miner software for your pool?
cgminer
September 03, 2012, 03:39:36 PM
My miner says "Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending", is that ok or my share has rejected?
I don't know, what miner software are you using?
I'm currently using Phoenix 2.0.
So do you have any recommend about best miner software for your pool?
September 03, 2012, 02:59:51 AM
Keep the design, love it. But the statistics embed should work without Flash.
September 02, 2012, 10:46:34 PM
My miner says "Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending", is that ok or my share has rejected?
I don't know, what miner software are you using?
September 02, 2012, 10:44:56 PM
I was getting over paid for about 30 mins .
http://hhtt.1209k.com/user-details.php?user=1DPJHpt2hBNNumXqErSzw4r5SzFk9yL5X2
I got 0.00071569 per 32 difficulty share found instead of 0.00064245.
Any reason why?
.http://hhtt.1209k.com/user-details.php?user=1DPJHpt2hBNNumXqErSzw4r5SzFk9yL5X2
I got 0.00071569 per 32 difficulty share found instead of 0.00064245.
Any reason why?
Only explanation I can come up with was blockexplorer temporarily reporting the wrong difficulty. I should use the local bitcoind for that number.
September 02, 2012, 02:54:24 PM
My miner says "Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending", is that ok or my share has rejected?
Jump to: