About the rewards, i will explain my opinion:
-If services can be delivered through mn, and the fees for doing it are a barely low amount, it wont be useful to deliver those services rather than just mining with the mn.
-If the amount is changed to a lower amount, to make services reward look better using the same fee for service, that will control the inflation, but maybe at a low price rate will cause some mn to go off.
-So if a way is found to have an equilibrium between the mine ratio and the services offered by mn, that hould be.
Just my opinion.
-If services can be delivered through mn, and the fees for doing it are a barely low amount, it wont be useful to deliver those services rather than just mining with the mn.
-If the amount is changed to a lower amount, to make services reward look better using the same fee for service, that will control the inflation, but maybe at a low price rate will cause some mn to go off.
-So if a way is found to have an equilibrium between the mine ratio and the services offered by mn, that hould be.
Just my opinion.
or the loop could be closed. let mn control the inflation. and let service fees be paid be service usage.
if a user (customer) makes use of a service why should this be free?
if there is an allocated cost then this could be redistributed over the network to those rendering these services.
this way mn and price/inflation is seperated from the product. And payment directly distributed to those that carry the cost of rendering the service.
What i was silling to say is that if masternode services are not as profitable as just running the mn, there wont be too much people willing to run the service.
I have to say that DPoS is a good experiemt but is causing a high inflation, that will be hard to control in the future
True 
