left the pool n stopped using the miner.
miner interface is very good if not the best so far !
but no api, it's a no no for me. when miner hangs, it does not tell which gpu has failed so it's another minus from me. locked miner to cwi only another minus.
as for the pool, i really like the dark theme & the responsiveness, very nice on that but no api
, even on lowdiff the diff is still very high, workers disappear and comes back when it feels like it.
would really like to help to test out both miner & pool but it's a little difficult without api to monitor both pools & miners especially if u have a handful of them. being locked to a pool with the points above & with a 0.7% fee is also a no go for me.
point & comments are just from me & being straight forward.
have quite a few disconnects too, last i reacll it was up to 8 disconnections within 12 hrs.
comparing with other pools, there so much less shares (although a high hashrate but less sharesis not good) which equals to less profits or to cover costs.
hope cwi can improve on these few points & i might consider to come back and test again. quite a few users left too. sad to see or talk about it but i hope the points above are taken as constructive points.
tanx mate ...
ive explained the majority of your points in great detail in earlier posts - and in breif in later posts ...
locking the pool is a necessary situation - already explained why ...
no api - also explained why ...
disconnects - also explained ...
high hashrate less shares? ... if you mean high hashrate less BLOCKS - then i understand ... but you also dont take into account 70GIGAhash in a network of over 2700GIGAhash ... so unless we are in the vicinity of of a few hundred gigahash - we will not continuously solve blocks - like your expectations rule ...
btw - the disconnects were 7 in total
... all on purpose - all me doing it ... changing and tweaking the stratum and code - so YOU would have a better mining system ...
i think i need to repeat this also - as it doesnt seem to be a priority to anyone that stipulates the points you have above - and all the nonsense about some of the issues ... some issue are very valid - others a fantasy ...
so - this is a BETA TEST ...
we have a beta miner ( CWIgm ) that is in test mode - that has one of the highest hashrates in the mining world to date in the supported algorithms ... it is the first breed of its kind - and you act like it has been around for years ( like ccminer for example ) and EXPECT that all will work ... it wont ... there will be bugs - there will be issues - there will breakages ...
thats ALL part of the testing process ...
we appreciate ALL the testing that has been done to date - but some point will not change for the time being as we do NOT want outside influences disturbing the controlled environment that the miner is in currently ... that means we will not change the tie in with the CWI-Pool system - and we will not change our stance on the api for the time being because we have OTHER developments we are taking on and into account ... developments which only our internal people know of ...
so that means - we wish you great mining - and good wishes - and have all the confidence that you will accept my straight forward response is as pliable as yours ...
the next revisions of the miner is better than this one - in that it has some fixes - some additions - and more optimization with a new algo ...
the development of the CWIgm WILL be tied in also theFARM ... our farm of gpus which we have started rebuilding ... but more on that much later ...
tanx again mate ... you have helped a great deal ...
#crysx
...
