### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 34.

tpd09

full member

Activity: 287

Merit: 100

@chrysophylax is there a command that allows automated restart of the miner? something like ZEC miner with "--r 6000" ?

I have the same issue with diff -

with 7 1080tis Undecided

Boulevard2005

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Is there anybody see pool up/down (receive coin/not receive coin) serveral times from yesterday to now???

Is there any problem with pool, administrator?

muisfn

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

how i can find a miner ??

i cant PM the TS

pr0ximus

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 100

Looks amazing. I would like to contribute by beta testing too. PMed you chrysophylax.

shubaduba

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

mine safe o/

I use different workers for each rig.
According this log, 2 GTX 1070 cards managed to send 1 share in 4 minutes!
As you see, this is lowdiff port.
Actually, my cards were not working more than 80% of time since pool did not receive any shares from this rig.
So actual hashrate is not 58.68 MH. It is like 5x times lower.
The only way to keep using this pool and miner is restarting miner every 5 minutes so diff will not raise that much.
Otherwise this miner is just wasting our mining hashrates.

VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 385.12
CPU: 0% ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8 [11:39:48]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 23114 | Block: 33101 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum | POW: 1250 | Estimated coins/day: 55.7378 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved: 0 | Diff: 1.6 | Shares: 135.2 | Rej: 0% | Speed: 58.68MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1070 : Shares: 54.65 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.03MH/s|
1.Gigabyte GTX 1070 : Shares: 80.55 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.51MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1070 : T:62C | F:47% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1883Mhz |
1.Gigabyte GTX 1070 : T:66C | F:52% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1921Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[11:35:10]Mean netDiff: 26120.7 |
[11:35:47]Mean netDiff: 26167.2 |
[11:36:07]Mean netDiff: 26303.4 |
[11:37:21]Share: 765dde97 |
[11:38:47]Mean netDiff: 26236.2 |
[11:39:08]Mean netDiff: 26244.5 |
[11:39:30]Mean netDiff: 26462.3 |
[11:39:48]Mean netDiff: 26472.4 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:shubaduba | Conn:0d 03:05:17 | Latency:91ms

xixou

member

Activity: 153

Merit: 11

Works very great with 4 gtx 1070 under win10, thank you!
Faster than ccminer sp for skunk/sigt.

enkayz

full member

Activity: 298

Merit: 100

hashbag.cc

i like the gui

cradge

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: cradge on August 09, 2017, 10:26:58 PM

11 hours running,
I have not encountered any issue yet.
I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

tdp 85%
coreclock 130
memory -502
temp at 61c
fan at 68%

update, after some tweaks miner can get 55 to 57 mh/s for an 1080 ti

tdp 88%
coreclock 135
memory -502
temp at 65c
fan at 72%
intensity 26.5

astronyu

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: Boulevard2005 on August 10, 2017, 08:56:11 PM

May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad

Looks like pool is fine over here.

Boulevard2005

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad

nfr

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

cradge

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 04:46:45 PM

This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

Can you show us youre tests done? i.e screenshots, data, test procedure before you arrived to this conclusion?

jenifive

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

UNICLIFE

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Stats: -i 22 1070 32Mh/s, 1060 6gb 20Mh/s, good informative ui

ArtG

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

I don't know how to download the cwigm for testing. Saw it on post#2 but I don't get it

you need to PM TS and indicate GPUs and OS.

ArtG

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:2.19% ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8 [21:09:41]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 18472.9 | Block: 32495 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum | POW: 1250 | Estimated coins/day: 380.801 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved: 0 | Diff: 1.6 | Shares: 177 | Rej: 0% | Speed: 316.26MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 38.85 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 52.37MH/s|
1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 39.1 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 51.82MH/s|
2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 25.95 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 53.46MH/s|
3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 26.05 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 52.91MH/s|
4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 20.15 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 53.23MH/s|
5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : Shares: 26.9 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 51.78MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:63C | F:94% | P:209W | I: 25.0 | Core:1844Mhz |
1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:64C | F:94% | P:205W | I: 25.0 | Core:1855Mhz |
2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:54C | F:68% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1870Mhz |
3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:66C | F:94% | P:220W | I: 25.0 | Core:1900Mhz |
4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:63C | F:92% | P:215W | I: 25.0 | Core:1885Mhz |
5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : T:69C | F:95% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1872Mhz

zhulick

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 100

i've tried the usual -p d=x (eg, -p d=0.25 for 64 at the pool) to manually set the worker diff, but that didn't work.

is there another command that would accomplish the same thing, or is it not one of the settings that i can't control from my side at this moment ?

i checked the help file, didn't see anything that would do it.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2870

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: shubaduba on August 10, 2017, 08:34:36 AM

After removing -s setting everything is perfect.

Only problem now is too high stratum difficulty.
It is about 20x higher above normal value.

I will keep mining with this issue, but I hope that you will make a step towards.
Would be great if you lower diff by 5 times or something like that.

great ...

one thing fixed ...

if you are pushing all your hashrate through ONE worker - the diff will be huge if you have a number of cards ...

you have the lodiff port configured and you are mining fine ... the stratum diff seems to be ok - but it will push pretty hard to try and get it equalized to a decent diff level for your miner ...

there are many factors that cause this - the aggressiveness of the stratum is only one factor - all machines mining through the one worker is another ... though you are showing ONE machine ... so its hit that maximum diff on that port ...

more tweaking i guess ...

im glad at least one thing is sorted now Tongue

...

#crysx

jenifive

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 12:19:13 PM

Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 12:12:36 PM

_________ __ ________
   \_ ___ \__ _ _|__|/ _____/ _____
   / / \ \/\ \/ \/ / / \ ___ / \
   _________\ \ \____\ /| \ \_\ \ Y Y \ __________
   \______ / \/\_/ |__|\______ /__|_| / /
   \/ \/ \/ /
   VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72% ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8 [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5 | Block: 32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum | POW: 1250 | Estimated coins/day: 143.177 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved: 0 | Diff: 1.6 | Shares: 4.8 | Rej: 0% | Speed: 117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 0 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000 |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5 |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244 |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1 |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124 |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms

On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

is there are a difference?

kleito

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: kleito on August 10, 2017, 12:34:07 PM

new bat cong
cwigm -c sigt -u **** -p *** --lodiff --max-temp=70 -i 25 -s 20 -N 10 --mean-net-diff=1.15

good?

Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 34. (Read 67732 times)