### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 35.

kabi123

full member

Activity: 247

Merit: 100

how to close this CWIgm miner?
if i use hard way ( X in window) nvidia drivers crash or i lose connetions to gpu...
i cant find anything in manual/readmy file...

ctrl+c( soft way) dontwork, Q dontwork, esc dontwork...

kleito

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

astronyu

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 11:12:36 AM

_________ __ ________
\_ ___ \__ _ _|__|/ _____/ _____
/ / \ \/\ \/ \/ / / \ ___ / \
_________\ \ \____\ /| \ \_\ \ Y Y \ __________
\______ / \/\_/ |__|\______ /__|_| / /
\/ \/ \/ /
VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72% ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8 [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5 | Block: 32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum | POW: 1250 | Estimated coins/day: 143.177 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved: 0 | Diff: 1.6 | Shares: 4.8 | Rej: 0% | Speed: 117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 0 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000 |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5 |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244 |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1 |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124 |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms

On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

jenifive

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

_________ __ ________
\_ ___ \__ _ _|__|/ _____/ _____
/ / \ \/\ \/ \/ / / \ ___ / \
_________\ \ \____\ /| \ \_\ \ Y Y \ __________
\______ / \/\_/ |__|\______ /__|_| / /
\/ \/ \/ /
VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72% ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8 [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5 | Block: 32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum | POW: 1250 | Estimated coins/day: 143.177 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved: 0 | Diff: 1.6 | Shares: 4.8 | Rej: 0% | Speed: 117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 0 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : Shares: 1.6 | Rej: 0 | Speed: 29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070 : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000 |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9 |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5 |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244 |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1 |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124 |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms

On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

Boulevard2005

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Seem loss coins from time of pool down. Sad.

Boulevard2005

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Is this ok, can coin loss back again?

zhulick

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 100

pool is back... i guess something got fixed/updated/restarted etc.

middle of the unluckiest run on a block yet.

Real_Unhooked

hero member

Activity: 838

Merit: 500

I think we need a watchdog script when a GPU gets sick. Other than that this is one sick miner.

Just curious can SKunk be tweaked further to crank out more hash rate? I see that sp_ dude claim he can make a 1070 run at the speeds of a 1080. Is that possible or are we at the max limits?

Boulevard2005

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Is there any problem? My last hour = 0 about 2 hour ago (my 1060 miner still run)

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

Seems the pool has some stratum disconnect problems atm.

lenosamsung

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: evilbaby on August 10, 2017, 08:24:53 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on August 10, 2017, 06:57:06 AM

Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 06:42:59 AM

I see that cwigm reported my total has is 118.5MH/s while on the pool it says I'm doing 50-100MH/s, is this normal?

in the beginning - yes ...

it does settle in to a more reasonably accurate figure the longer you mine and more shares are submitted ...

but the pool rates are never completely accurate as they estimate the miner hash by the submitted shares in a given amount of time ( with mpos that usually 5mins ) - whereas the miner is quite accurate because its the one producing the hashrate ...

the pool will always fluctuate somewhat - but should remain within a reasonable level of accuracy ... at time it will jump wildly - as many other factors affect the share rate submitted ... but over all - its ok ...

#crysx

can complite for linux ( ubuntu) ? i have 12 card 1060 nvidia with main asrock h110 BTC pro

I had ubuntu 16.04 miner which has gtx 1050ti 12way (tb250-btc+)

but,
Now CWIGM windows version is provided only

I'm looking forward to the next version.

evilbaby

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Quote from: chrysophylax on August 10, 2017, 06:57:06 AM

Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 06:42:59 AM

I see that cwigm reported my total has is 118.5MH/s while on the pool it says I'm doing 50-100MH/s, is this normal?

in the beginning - yes ...

it does settle in to a more reasonably accurate figure the longer you mine and more shares are submitted ...

but the pool rates are never completely accurate as they estimate the miner hash by the submitted shares in a given amount of time ( with mpos that usually 5mins ) - whereas the miner is quite accurate because its the one producing the hashrate ...

the pool will always fluctuate somewhat - but should remain within a reasonable level of accuracy ... at time it will jump wildly - as many other factors affect the share rate submitted ... but over all - its ok ...

#crysx

can complite for linux ( ubuntu) ? i have 12 card 1060 nvidia with main asrock h110 BTC pro

zhulick

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 100

Quote from: abudfv2008 on August 10, 2017, 07:31:23 AM

Quote from: Legis on August 10, 2017, 05:47:24 AM

Quote from: abudfv2008 on August 10, 2017, 05:37:15 AM

Quote from: Legis on August 10, 2017, 05:29:32 AM

I run the cards at the +/- best efficiency (MH per watt), I'm not after highest possible speed regardless of the power consumption.

Profitability today is 10s times more than electricity cost (at least in most of the areas).
Mine 1070 run at 56-57Mh/s without no tweaking more than juast move the slider in Afterburner and no overheating. The difference covers all additional costs. So what's the point of that?

How many watts does the 1070 draw at that speed according to the miner?

56-57 = 150W
53-54 = 135W

also depends on the card. i currently have three different model cards that i mine with. they all seem to be tuned differently in terms of tdp right from the factory. for example the asus and msi cards i have both have wacky tdp, with msi running 20 watts higher right off the bat, and asus running about 10 watt lower then a "standard" founders edition cards. my evga cards are a completely different story. they most reflect the power settings of the fe cards, and have the best power management out of all of them.

in other words, it doesn't just depend on the model, but also how the maker tunes the cards at the factory, and they all have their own sweet spot.

for example.

msi 1070 - 135w at 65 tdp, if i go any lower the hash drops about 20 percent instantly.
asus 170 - 125w at 75 tdp, any lower and the hash drops by about 20 percent.
evga 1070ftw - 110w at 60 tdp - can go lower on wattage (down to 50%tdp) while dropping the hash proportionally, after 50 the hash drops significantly.

all produce about the same hash rate at these power settings - 53-54 on dnr, with asus lagging behind at about 50.

i found the evga cards to be much better in adjusting power, and overall most flexible. msi to be a bit faster closer full tdp, and asus pretty much terrible at everything. the only saving grace for the asus is that it only requires a single 8 port pin, which would make it easier to deploy at scale. the evga requires a dual 8 pin power plug, which is a pain in the ass to find cables/adapters for, especially when you need to run 6-8 of them on a single rig etc.. i got the msi and asus cards first, then i got the evga's... i've been getting nothing but evga since.

astronyu

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: falconrus on August 10, 2017, 07:28:34 AM

How i can get beta miner)?

See below

Quote from: chrysophylax on August 09, 2017, 09:36:39 AM

the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx

astronyu

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: chrysophylax on August 10, 2017, 06:57:06 AM

Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 06:42:59 AM

I see that cwigm reported my total has is 118.5MH/s while on the pool it says I'm doing 50-100MH/s, is this normal?

in the beginning - yes ...

it does settle in to a more reasonably accurate figure the longer you mine and more shares are submitted ...

but the pool rates are never completely accurate as they estimate the miner hash by the submitted shares in a given amount of time ( with mpos that usually 5mins ) - whereas the miner is quite accurate because its the one producing the hashrate ...

the pool will always fluctuate somewhat - but should remain within a reasonable level of accuracy ... at time it will jump wildly - as many other factors affect the share rate submitted ... but over all - its ok ...

#crysx

Quote from: zhulick on August 10, 2017, 07:05:25 AM

Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 06:42:59 AM

[Rephrase]

How many of you have the pool showing same hash rate with the miner +/- 1-5MH/s?

it's rare for any pool to show your hash that precisely all the time.

hashrate reported by the pool will always fluctuate. when you mine coins with fast blocks (like sigt or dnr), it will often fluctuate wildly.

keep in mind, the pool doesn't know or care about your actual hashrate. it can only count the hash by the shares you actually submit. when blocks move fast, your gpu will sometimes submit a lot of shares, and sometime will not be able to submit any before a new block is already in play.

for example, my single 1070 that mines at 29'ish sometimes shows up at 50 and sometimes shows up at 10 etc.

all depends how many shares it managed to submit in whatever polling period the pool uses to measure hash.

Thank you both, explanation well understood.

shubaduba

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

mine safe o/

After removing -s setting everything is perfect.

Only problem now is too high stratum difficulty.
It is about 20x higher above normal value.

I will keep mining with this issue, but I hope that you will make a step towards.
Would be great if you lower diff by 5 times or something like that.

abudfv2008

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 106

Quote from: Legis on August 10, 2017, 05:47:24 AM

Quote from: abudfv2008 on August 10, 2017, 05:37:15 AM

Quote from: Legis on August 10, 2017, 05:29:32 AM

I run the cards at the +/- best efficiency (MH per watt), I'm not after highest possible speed regardless of the power consumption.

Profitability today is 10s times more than electricity cost (at least in most of the areas).
Mine 1070 run at 56-57Mh/s without no tweaking more than juast move the slider in Afterburner and no overheating. The difference covers all additional costs. So what's the point of that?

How many watts does the 1070 draw at that speed according to the miner?

56-57 = 150W
53-54 = 135W

falconrus

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

How i can get beta miner)?

Django69

newbie

Activity: 74

Merit: 0

Hello,

i got this error sometimes "invalid nonces"

what it is?

soothaa

hero member

Activity: 1151

Merit: 528

Been running for 18 or so hours now.

The

:

Miner is stable and nice!
I love how fast and responsive your web pool is - so tired of slow laggy ones

The Sad

:
No API to monitor the miner. My copy of Awesome Miner is very angry all my nVidia rigs went away and the AMD ones are still mining ETH fine.

I really hope this changes soon - even if it is just a basic clone of the ccminer API showing hashrate and temps..

Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 35. (Read 67732 times)