Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 35. (Read 67732 times)

how to close this CWIgm miner?
if i use hard way ( X in window) nvidia drivers crash or i lose connetions to gpu...
i cant find anything in manual/readmy file...

ctrl+c( soft way) dontwork, Q dontwork, esc dontwork...

CPU:0.78%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [13:32:58]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 22797.1            | Block:      32405 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 88.5133                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 48      | Rej: 2.53807% | Speed:   77.03M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 12.5    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.09MH/s|
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.47MH/s|
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 18.75   | Rej: 0.25 | Speed:   19.32MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : Shares: 11.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   19.02MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:59C | F:70% | P: 80W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : T:63C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1916Mhz |
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:64C | F:75% | P: 81W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : T:65C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1830Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[13:30:24]Mean netDiff: 21600.9        | [12:53:11][GPU2]:Duplicate share
[13:30:26]Share: 16c56141              | [13:19:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
[13:30:45]Share: 3066cd17              | )
[13:30:47]Share: 94c5e99a              |
[13:31:25]Share: 335f288d              |
[13:31:44]Mean netDiff: 21884.5        |
[13:31:47]Share: 66bae883              |
[13:32:39]Share: 0070d29e              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:kleito85  | Conn:0d 00:39:50 | Latency:245ms


is good?


bat
cwigm -c sigt -u *** -p ** --lodiff --max-temp=70

bat conf help me

You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5            | Block:      32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 143.177                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 4.8     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 0       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000      |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5        |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244              |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1        |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124              |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete    | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms


On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

Seem loss coins from time of pool down. Sad.

Is this ok, can coin loss back again?

pool is back... i guess something got fixed/updated/restarted etc.

middle of the unluckiest run on a block yet.

I think we need a watchdog script when a GPU gets sick. Other than that this is one sick miner.

Just curious can SKunk be tweaked further to crank out more hash rate? I see that sp_ dude claim he can make a 1070 run at the speeds of a 1080. Is that possible or are we at the max limits?

Is there any problem? My last hour = 0 about 2 hour ago (my 1060 miner still run)

Seems the pool has some stratum disconnect problems atm.

I had ubuntu 16.04 miner which has gtx 1050ti 12way (tb250-btc+)

but,
Now CWIGM windows version is provided only


I'm looking forward to the next version.

can complite for linux ( ubuntu) ?  i have 12 card  1060 nvidia with main asrock h110 BTC pro

also depends on the card.  i currently have three different model cards that i mine with.  they all seem to be tuned differently in terms of tdp right from the factory.  for example the asus and msi cards i have both have wacky tdp, with msi running 20 watts higher right off the bat, and asus running about 10 watt lower then a "standard" founders edition cards.  my evga cards are a completely different story.  they most reflect the power settings of the fe cards, and have the best power management out of all of them.

in other words, it doesn't just depend on the model, but also how the maker tunes the cards at the factory, and they all have their own sweet spot.

for example.

msi 1070 - 135w at 65 tdp, if i go any lower the hash drops about 20 percent instantly.
asus 170 - 125w at 75 tdp, any lower and the hash drops by about 20 percent.
evga 1070ftw - 110w at 60 tdp - can go lower on wattage (down to 50%tdp) while dropping the hash proportionally, after 50 the hash drops significantly.

all produce about the same hash rate at these power settings - 53-54 on dnr, with asus lagging behind at about 50.

i found the evga cards to be much better in adjusting power, and overall most flexible.  msi to be a bit faster closer full tdp, and asus pretty much terrible at everything.  the only saving grace for the asus is that it only requires a single 8 port pin, which would make it easier to deploy at scale. the evga requires a dual 8 pin power plug, which is a pain in the ass to find cables/adapters for, especially when you need to run 6-8 of them on a single rig etc..   i got the msi and asus cards first, then i got the evga's... i've been getting nothing but evga since.

See below

Thank you both, explanation well understood.

After removing -s setting everything is perfect.


Only problem now is too high stratum difficulty.
It is about 20x higher above normal value.

I will keep mining with this issue, but I hope that you will make a step towards.
Would be great if you lower diff by 5 times or something like that.

56-57 = 150W
53-54 = 135W

How i can get beta miner)?

Hello,

i got this error sometimes "invalid nonces"

what it is?

Been running for 18 or so hours now.

The  :

Miner is stable and nice!
I love how fast and responsive your web pool is - so tired of slow laggy ones

The  :
No API to monitor the miner. My copy of Awesome Miner is very angry all my nVidia rigs went away and the AMD ones are still mining ETH fine.

I really hope this changes soon - even if it is just a basic clone of the ccminer API showing hashrate and temps..