Pages:
Author

Topic: A Public Plea for Civility - page 2. (Read 4907 times)

donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
August 25, 2012, 05:41:01 PM
#29
When someone joins a new community, online or otherwise, he observes the behavior of others and mimics it. If he sees everyone else is trolling he is much more likely to do it themselves than if everyone is civil. The choice of joining also depends on the existing atmosphere - a civil community will comparatively attract more civil people. Once the established culture is civil it can be maintained with minimal effort. This is why I don't buy the "this is the interwebz so there's nothing you can do about it" argument.

Of course, given that the current atmosphere on the forum isn't civil, something will have to be done to change it. The OP shouldn't be seen as trying to convince the trolls as it is unlikely to have such an effect. It really is an invitation for an open discussion between moderators and veterans who care about making the change, to see what kind of behavior should not be tolerated and how to act on it; ideally veterans should feel comfortable reporting to mod obvious transgressions, and the mods should have the capacity to deal with them.

Basically, if you agree with the OP and see the kind of behavior it talked about, report it to mod, and if it's a borderline case maybe also post about it in meta to see how others feel about it.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
August 25, 2012, 04:43:13 PM
#28

Someone once told me if you cry about it, it will all go away. There is lots of crying on this board but nothing goes away.... so stock crying about everything.

I think it works better to say "ignore it and it will go away".


I agree. There are some variables that complicate this (internet, anonymity, etc), but ironically it's not a problem unless you're trying to promote anonymity (which I disagree with, just look at the sockpuppetry here)

Hey, I'm a sockpuppet, and I still try to be civil.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
rippleFanatic
August 25, 2012, 02:01:42 PM
#27
If someone comes up to you in the street and makes you an offer that sounds to good to be true, you might not even politely decline (although it would be the mature thing to do) you certainly don't scream "SCAMMM, PONNNZIIIIIII" at the top of your lungs, and even bother to come back to him and insult him, like it happens on the forums.

If someone is knocking on every door in my neighborhood with a utility scam, I would follow him around to my neighbors so I can warn them on the spot. If one has the right to solicit, another the right to anti-solicit. I would also call the police.

Warning people about scams isn't fun but it is civil. However, promoting scams, even if done politely, is extremely ant-civil.

As for baseless accusations, they aren't looking so baseless now are they? There was a strong basis, starting with evidence of absence (not to be confused with absence of evidence), that pirate was a operating a ponzi scam.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
August 25, 2012, 11:05:41 AM
#26
The answer is simple:

Only participate in discussions you find valuable, ignore the rest.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
August 25, 2012, 11:03:16 AM
#25

I. Introduction

Over the past few months, I've observed a general trend on this forum that I think is rather disturbing. We have always disagreed and debated on a vast variety of subjects, but more and more often of late those debates seem to turn into or in some cases start as nothing but 'flame wars', to use the colloquial term. This forum, once a reasonable facsimile of a haven for intellectual and civil discussion, has mutated into a wasteland of mud-slinging, baseless accusations, fear-mongering, utterly nonsensical FUD, mob mentalities, and worst of all, xenophobia. This is most pronounced in the Marketplace and associated sub-forums, but seems to be permeating throughout the extent of these boards.

II. Why The Marketplace Matters

Some of you probably avoid the Marketplace altogether, and wonder if it really matters. Regardless of where you prefer to spend your time, the fact remains that Bitcoin is a currency. Trade is necessary for both a healthy economy and, perhaps more importantly, recruitment of new users.

III. Mud-slinging

We all disagree with each other. If we didn't, we'd have nothing to talk about. But disagreement does not have to translate into insults.
Ad hominem reasoning not only fails to provide any result of worth for either involved party; it poisons the general topic of discussion and makes the thread useless for any future or current readers. One simple insult can create multiple threads of incoherent flaming.

IV. Baseless Accusations

These threads tend to sound like tabloid articles. Inciting headlines, extravagant claims, and no logical evidence whatsoever to back them up. If you have a serious accusation and want results, please make a factual claim and back it up (Example). Factual and civil trade disagreement threads have a much higher rate of resolution. Remember, whether the counterparty is a scammer or not, they are a human being, and a successful dispute resolution is much more likely if you treat them like one.

V. Fear-mongering

This sometimes goes hand-in-hand with the above, but sometimes not insomuch an accusation as chaos-inciting content, often simply links to other threads with an eye-catching title attached. First of all, we do not need multiple different threads to discuss the same thing. Second, if you're going to make extravagant claims, at least take the time to make them yourself.

VI. Utterly Nonsensical FUD

Also known as spam. I receive quite enough of this in my email inbox. If you don't have anything useful or intelligent to post, don't post. It's as simple as that.

VII. Mob Mentalities

Also known as the 'exponential thread growth problem'. Don't take what other people say at face value, and don't simply repeat other's sentiments. All of you have something unique to contribute to discussions. Contribute it!

VIII. Xenophobia

This one concerns me the most, as I think it could have far-reaching implications. Most people who read about Bitcoin and come here have read almost ubiquitously negative press discussing drugs, Ponzi schemes, and ever-imminent collapse. They decided to take a chance and investigate for themselves. What do they find? A community which refuses to do business with anyone relatively new. A community filled with animosity. Half the forums polluted with allegations of Ponzi schemes. In other words, they find exactly what the media told them to expect. Their conclusion? The media is right. Do we really want to embody what the media portrays us as?

IX. Addendum: BS&T

First of all, I will admit that I am most certainly not an unbiased observer. I did my research and invested into BS&T. I have no factual conclusion as to whether it is a Ponzi or not, nor do I think I have enough expertise to surmise a claim. But, regardless of whether BS&T is a ponzi, an innocent company investing in third-world medical care, or an elaborate hoax conceived by Bernie Madoff's hitherto unknown twin, endlessly fretting and arguing about it will accomplish nothing whatsoever.

Those of you with convinced BS&T is a Ponzi scheme, I'm glad you're being cautious with investment. Please refrain from starting hundreds of separate threads stating nothing new whatsoever. Perhaps it is a scam, perhaps not. I know some of you have far superior wisdom which you are ever eager to share, but us mere mortals are still capable of intelligent analysis and decision-making. If BS&T truly is a Ponzi, somehow I suspect we will notice.

X. Conclusion

I'm just some nameless forum member writing another rant, albeit perhaps not on one of the usual subjects. All I ask is that you read and think upon it. Perhaps this won't make any difference. But it certainly wouldn't have if I didn't write it.

Best regards,
BinaryMage

Love this post, it should be posted in the Newb sections stickied.

Someone once told me if you cry about it, it will all go away. There is lots of crying on this board but nothing goes away.... so stock crying about everything.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
August 25, 2012, 08:42:55 AM
#24
Thank you for making this post, I've considered making one like this myself, but I knew I could not describe is sufficiently eloquent.

What bothers me most is the fact that people really do act like the stereotypical idiot on the internet, when it's really easy not to. Just look at the people not doing it, in fact just act like you're IRL, it's not that hard. If someone comes up to you in the street and makes you an offer that sounds to good to be true, you might not even politely decline (although it would be the mature thing to do) you certainly don't scream "SCAMMM, PONNNZIIIIIII" at the top of your lungs, and even bother to come back to him and insult him, like it happens on the forums.

What I would basically suggest is that people should act more like a real world adult ... that shouldn't be too much to ask.

What's that I hear? People should be more social and less retarded? Genius!

I agree. There are some variables that complicate this (internet, anonymity, etc), but ironically it's not a problem unless you're trying to promote anonymity (which I disagree with, just look at the sockpuppetry here)
sr. member
Activity: 353
Merit: 251
August 25, 2012, 07:39:19 AM
#23
Thank you for making this post, I've considered making one like this myself, but I knew I could not describe is sufficiently eloquent.

What bothers me most is the fact that people really do act like the stereotypical idiot on the internet, when it's really easy not to. Just look at the people not doing it, in fact just act like you're IRL, it's not that hard. If someone comes up to you in the street and makes you an offer that sounds to good to be true, you might not even politely decline (although it would be the mature thing to do) you certainly don't scream "SCAMMM, PONNNZIIIIIII" at the top of your lungs, and even bother to come back to him and insult him, like it happens on the forums.

What I would basically suggest is that people should act more like a real world adult ... that shouldn't be too much to ask.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
August 25, 2012, 04:27:15 AM
#22
While I totally agree BinaryMage, I firmly believe that for things to change, the mods need to start working harder, and actually moderating this place.   A stricter stance on everything you listed in the OP would greatly help keep this place more civil.   That, along with actually merging multiple threads rather than having 12 on the same subject would go a long way to making this a usable forum again.

Right now it's a pretty horrible place to be, which is NOT a good thing when we're talking the primary site for all things bitcoin.  This is where new people to Bitcoin will arrive after 1 google search, and right now I very much doubt they'd stick around.
+1

Asking for civility on the open Internet is like asking a dog not to drag its ass on the carpet; it is an exercise in futility.





Absolutely.

If you think its bad now you should have seen it before the newbie section was introduced and the SA troll invasion happened.

Everyone who was here at that time knows this to be true.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
August 25, 2012, 04:23:03 AM
#21
If you think its bad now you should have seen it before the newbie section was introduced and the SA troll invasion happened.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
August 24, 2012, 10:28:41 PM
#20
Asking for civility on the open Internet is like asking a dog not to drag its ass on the carpet; it is an exercise in futility.



sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
August 24, 2012, 09:39:16 PM
#19
While I totally agree BinaryMage, I firmly believe that for things to change, the mods need to start working harder, and actually moderating this place.   A stricter stance on everything you listed in the OP would greatly help keep this place more civil.   That, along with actually merging multiple threads rather than having 12 on the same subject would go a long way to making this a usable forum again.

Right now it's a pretty horrible place to be, which is NOT a good thing when we're talking the primary site for all things bitcoin.  This is where new people to Bitcoin will arrive after 1 google search, and right now I very much doubt they'd stick around.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
August 24, 2012, 09:26:54 PM
#18
I have to agree about the BS&T thing, and it happens on other topics too. There will be multiple threads about the same topic. People, please just reply in the relevant topic, starting a new one just clutters up the forum and makes it harder to find relevant information.

I post on messageboards which enforce this rule and it has pros and cons.  Very often people won't read more than the last page of a long thread, so threads frequently get derailed by people asking questions which have already been answered in the thread.  It gets very old, very fast.  

One feature which helps make mega-threads manageable is the ability to pull up all of a user's posts in a thread.  This would be extremely valuable if people were only interested in reading posts by service operators or others commenting "officially".  In the Bicoinica threads, it would have been useful to be able to pull up all Amir's or Tihan's posts in those threads.

I think that the most recent forums split has made it even harder to find important information.  Important information related to services is posted just about anywhere and is often found in counter-intuitive places.  The Intersango megathread is a good example of this.  From September, they won't be accepting GBP transfers until they find a new bank but that information is buried in a general Marketplace thread, not in Service Announcements, Service Discussion or Trading, which are the places you'd expect to find that kind of information.

People start new threads when they feel their particular point or question is being lost in the general noise or ignored.  Sometimes it's ignored because people consider it irrelevant or it's the 7,000th time a particular point has been made or question asked.  Merging threads or locking new threads about an existing topic (with a link to the existing thread) are options which might be useful but they require more pro-active moderation than is usual around here (if you're going to merge or split threads, you need to do it early otherwise it just creates a mess).
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
August 24, 2012, 09:26:17 PM
#17
Hence, MNW's FUD tax Grin
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
August 24, 2012, 08:39:10 PM
#16
+1

Read the OP as well as all the posts leading up to me submitting this one.

~Bruno~
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
August 24, 2012, 08:37:42 PM
#15
@ OP:

+1
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
August 24, 2012, 07:30:38 PM
#14
You can plea all you want, but I don't think it'll change things.  This is about as free and unrestricted of a forum as you'll find, which is why it is what it is - a cesspool.  A while back, I attempted to start up a competitor forum that would actually ban people if they weren't sufficiently respectful, among other rules, but was unable to draw a sustainable crowd.

So, I await the next true rival to the forum, that I may move on to someplace less... awful than this.

There is the totalitarian way to have good behavior - by rules and punishment - and then there is the libertarian way to have good behavior - by letting people make the choice themselves. We do not have to change the rules, we must  just encourage people to act better.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
August 24, 2012, 07:23:49 PM
#13
You can plea all you want, but I don't think it'll change things.  This is about as free and unrestricted of a forum as you'll find, which is why it is what it is - a cesspool.  A while back, I attempted to start up a competitor forum that would actually ban people if they weren't sufficiently respectful, among other rules, but was unable to draw a sustainable crowd.

So, I await the next true rival to the forum, that I may move on to someplace less... awful than this.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
August 24, 2012, 07:15:58 PM
#12
How many of the people who have a problem with civility will respond in the desired manner to a public plea?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
August 24, 2012, 06:39:46 PM
#11
I guess the thing to do is lead by example. If you stay above the name calling and only post thoughtful responses, and give props to others who do as well, and generally ignore all the immature people, eventually this will be a better place.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
August 24, 2012, 06:03:40 PM
#10

I personally don't see much of a problem.  The community, as a microcosm of the internet generally, is full of dick-heads.  So what?  I value the fairly unobstructed view into the community psychology and I think that a whole lot of rules and regulations and P's and Q's to watch would make that more foggy.  Maybe the more dick-head-ish tend to be more vocal and obnoxious, but most internet user's will have figured that out by now.

I'm actually more offended by a signature block full of advertising spam than someone calling someone else a naughty word.  But that's just me.

Pages:
Jump to: