Both great points that warrant proper thoughtful responses.
Firstly, in respect of implementing a units system we do have a proven track record that is based on a units system. Secondly, our background is in trading financial markets for over 25 years so as you can well imagine we have tried and ultimately discarded more systems than we could ever mention here that range from the most conservative to the most aggressive Martingale systems imaginable. The true test of the worth or value of any system is in understanding how it withstands the test of time over many years so as to ride out euphoric gains and devastating bubbles, corrections or crashes in financial markets or the hottest and coldest of winning streaks in sports wagering. That being said, we recommend flat betting each and every one of our single daily picks and subscribers would be wise in attributing between 1% and 2% of their available capital to each such bet and no bets per day should ever total more than 5% of your available capital regardless of who you might be following or relying upon for guidance. While we recommend only one pick per day, we do sometimes find a few picks that meet our initial criteria in which case we must scrutinize these picks further in order to ultimately retain only the very best pick. In such instances, we do wager on each and every one of those picks each and every day for previously discussed reasons so you can well understand how the size of such wagers would be extremely conservative in respect of our overall available capital.
Lastly, to briefly touch upon our units system, yesterday's daily pick was likely a push for most subscribers depending on which sports book you may have utilized such that you would be flat on the day (1 unit out and 1 unit returned = net 0). For those who may have gotten yesterday's pick in the win column based on the +3.5 line you would be up on the day (1 unit out and 1.724 units returned = net +0.724 units).
We will definitely start posting our net units won/lost and you can always choose to follow us on Twitter at @abitbetter247 where we will also start making such information available. We will likely only go back to the start of this month as these statistics are more readily available for potential subscribers to scrutinize whereas historical data (which we do record meticulously) is apt to be considered less reliable by the skeptical general public.
Again, thank you for your comment and we hope that we have satisfactorily addressed your comments albeit in this shortened and abbreviated response.
Best of luck to everyone for today!