So a tentative list of candidates might be:
ArcticWolf
Icebreaker - long time everything both bitcoin and amc
chefborjan - has been around for ages with amc and has good input imo
I think we need to make sure there is a balance of people on the board if their role is just advisory. I guess in theory its about leaving the technical side of things to Ken, but we ideally need:
- Someone who is used to account balancing
- Someone with experience in IPOs, shares etc
- Someone with experience with the nuances of bitcoin
- someone who is used to communicating with the public
Maybe also a 'lay member' of the community so that the 'experts' on the board don't lose sight of the fact that decisions may be obvious to them but confusing to others.
.
I don't know if I have enough experience for anything other than the communication or lay member role. I think I will bring a decent amount of level headedness and critical thinking to the table, but its important to try and pick board members based on their merits as well rather than just how long they have been on an internet forum. Problem is... how do you tell if anyone is lying about their experiences?
My highwater mark was 50k shares, but I'd be happy to serve on the board or advisory committee.
I can contribute my experience with large scale mining to audit/optimize hardware/pool/network performance.
I have above-average experience with stocks and IPOs but am not a finance pro.
I have some experience with accounting, business plans, etc.
I have a functional understanding of Bitcoin but am not a professional cryptographer or coder.
I have top-notch communication skills, supreme mastery of English, and excel in persuasive or technical writing contexts.
If anyone thinks I'm lying about these qualifications I can write a short cool-story-bro demonstrating knowledge of the claimed domains.
I also have expertise in logical analysis, enjoy playing devil's advocate, and will prevent/disrupt any group-think occurring in the board room.