[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 54.

MRKLYE

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1003

Designer - Developer

Quote from: wonker on September 09, 2013, 12:32:48 AM

Quote from: MRKLYE on September 09, 2013, 12:19:17 AM

Hey folks.. Is it possible for an activemining admin to transfer shares between Bitfunder and BCTTC?

If not I believe a pool should be set up to allow investors to do so.. *my 2 cents*

This is answered on nearly every second page of this thread. Ken and Co. is working on success of his company.
Why should they care and waste their time with manually transfering hundreds of peoples shares?

If you want it transfered, simply sell in one market and buy in the other market...

Hey Wonker, I'm sorry I didn't flip through and read 299 pages of the post, Cunt.

I think Transfers between exchanges would boost the share price considerably.

wonker

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

Quote from: MRKLYE on September 09, 2013, 12:19:17 AM

Hey folks.. Is it possible for an activemining admin to transfer shares between Bitfunder and BCTTC?

If not I believe a pool should be set up to allow investors to do so.. *my 2 cents*

This is answered on nearly every second page of this thread. Ken and Co. is working on success of his company.
Why should they care and waste their time with manually transfering hundreds of peoples shares?

If you want it transfered, simply sell in one market and buy in the other market...

ronaldlee0917

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: MRKLYE on September 09, 2013, 12:19:17 AM

Hey folks.. Is it possible for an activemining admin to transfer shares between Bitfunder and BCTTC?

If not I believe a pool should be set up to allow investors to do so.. *my 2 cents*

Last time this was done for a premium of $5000.

MRKLYE

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1003

Designer - Developer

Hey folks.. Is it possible for an activemining admin to transfer shares between Bitfunder and BCTTC?

If not I believe a pool should be set up to allow investors to do so.. *my 2 cents*

carpetbagger

sr. member

Activity: 258

Merit: 250

You can trust me, I have an avatar

Is actm still planning to set up in Springfield Underground?

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

lol, just popped in here for a minute to see crumbs and eskimobob having a conversation. Cheesy

looks like you are just talking to yourselves now boys. Not even Ken reads this shit anymore. lol

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: FNG on September 08, 2013, 02:52:22 PM

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:48:49 PM

Quote from: FNG on September 08, 2013, 02:40:00 PM

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:33:50 PM

Quote from: creativex on September 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM

Obviously. Umm...why?

Because bitcoins mined in China stay in China -- that's the law!
Edit: And Chinese chips stay in China because ~~fuq, that's why!~~ NDA.

Because it's cheaper in China, shipping is cheaper, and power is cheaper

Does that mean that Ken won't have to compete with them?

Yes. I don't think anyone who isn't invested in AcM realistically thinks Ken will compete with anyone

Ken has a lease on a batcave and enough old 4u cases to fill a dumpster. Put those two together, add 28, stir & we have enthusiasm!1!

@EskimoBob: Almost everything is made in in China.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: SebastianJu on September 08, 2013, 02:06:50 PM

...

Quote from: Ozymandias on September 08, 2013, 01:43:06 PM

Just for the record, friedcat has said that his gen 1 chips cost ~$10,000 per TH/s or $10 per gh/s.

Thats the price for the running miner, in case someone thinks thats only for the ASIC's.

OK, this is makes more sense than 1.50

This changes the fictional Markup to 170 % and Cross margin to 63.00% and fictional number of units will go up to 2600.
How many units did BFL manage do send out per week? Was it around 200? What about Asicminer?

PS! Huh... I just can not resist, I have to say this: Made in China = shit

FNG

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:48:49 PM

Quote from: FNG on September 08, 2013, 02:40:00 PM

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:33:50 PM

Quote from: creativex on September 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM

Obviously. Umm...why?

Because bitcoins mined in China stay in China -- that's the law!
Edit: And Chinese chips stay in China because ~~fuq, that's why!~~ NDA.

Because it's cheaper in China, shipping is cheaper, and power is cheaper

Does that mean that Ken won't have to compete with them?

Yes. I don't think anyone who isn't invested in AcM realistically thinks Ken will compete with anyone

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: FNG on September 08, 2013, 02:40:00 PM

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:33:50 PM

Quote from: creativex on September 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM

Obviously. Umm...why?

Because bitcoins mined in China stay in China -- that's the law!
Edit: And Chinese chips stay in China because ~~fuq, that's why!~~ NDA.

Because it's cheaper in China, shipping is cheaper, and power is cheaper

Does that mean that Ken won't have to compete with them?

FNG

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: crumbs on September 08, 2013, 02:33:50 PM

Quote from: creativex on September 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM

Obviously. Umm...why?

Because bitcoins mined in China stay in China -- that's the law!
Edit: And Chinese chips stay in China because ~~fuq, that's why!~~ NDA.

Because it's cheaper in China, shipping is cheaper, and power is cheaper

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: creativex on September 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM

Obviously. Umm...why?

Because bitcoins mined in China stay in China -- that's the law!
Edit: And Chinese chips stay in China because ~~fuq, that's why!~~ NDA.

creativex

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Obviously. Umm...why?

FNG

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: Ozymandias on September 08, 2013, 01:43:06 PM

Just for the record, friedcat has said that his gen 1 chips cost ~$10,000 per TH/s or $10 per gh/s.

But this is ActiveMining we're talking about. They can obviously get it much cheaper in the U.S than someone from china can get it in China..lets not worry about the cost of power either

SebastianJu

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 1083

Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 08, 2013, 12:23:20 PM

JimmyJazz, good ideas. +1

But if this really is a 1718% markup business ($1.50 per Gh), this party can not last for long.
How soon can we expect cheap chinese copies (stolen designs) to hit the market?
Next 6 month's are going to be interesting.

In order to prevent stolen designs and if middlemens are needed the middlemen only should get the info they have to know, that does not include the design of the chip. The foundry itself should be the only receiving the chip design. The foundry cant give that away without risking its business.

Quote from: Ozymandias on September 08, 2013, 01:43:06 PM

Just for the record, friedcat has said that his gen 1 chips cost ~$10,000 per TH/s or $10 per gh/s.

Thats the price for the running miner, in case someone thinks thats only for the ASIC's.

Ozymandias

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Just for the record, friedcat has said that his gen 1 chips cost ~$10,000 per TH/s or $10 per gh/s.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: JimmyJazz on September 08, 2013, 01:34:35 PM

I guess that all the companies are in the same boat. However ActM are one of the few who will have the best technology available to carry on until the difficulty becomes to much. This is why I think it is very important for the company to look towards even better technologies ASAP.

However, ActM are also in a stronger position as they can buy these miners at the cost of manufacture. Making them more profitable and easy to acquire for a longer period.

I hope ActiveMining put alot more work into the promotion of the products and building a strong brand image.
Also focusing on competitive pricing and simple product offering.

+1

JimmyJazz

full member

Activity: 207

Merit: 100

I guess that all the companies are in the same boat. However ActM are one of the few who will have the best technology available to carry on until the difficulty becomes to much. This is why I think it is very important for the company to look towards even better technologies ASAP.

However, ActM are also in a stronger position as they can buy these miners at the cost of manufacture. Making them more profitable and easy to acquire for a longer period.

I hope ActiveMining put alot more work into the promotion of the products and building a strong brand image.
Also focusing on competitive pricing and simple product offering.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: JimmyJazz on September 08, 2013, 01:02:45 PM

So what do people expect the share price to be if everything goes to plan? 0.04?
Also dividends, could we take in 50,000btc a month?

Look at the difficulty

I bet we haven't seen anything yet. 116+ by Decembe will not surprise me at all.
Coin from mining will be only a temporary boost. They really need to sell the shit out of those rigs and chips before they become "obsolete" in 8-12 months. If diff keeps soaring, the hardware price hast to start falling soon. Same happens to profits form mining.

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: JimmyJazz on September 08, 2013, 01:02:45 PM

So what do people expect the share price to be if everything goes to plan? 0.04?
...

That depends -- are we talking burnside's gameserver or BitFunder?

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 54. (Read 479317 times)