Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 74. (Read 479317 times)

Hmm... Interesting.

Err... You're promoting Just-Dice if your sig.  A gambling site that is built around the idea of investors vs gamblers.  Are you suggesting that you yourself are a moron then?

eASIC press release:

http://virtualminingcorp.com/pr130904.pdf
http://www.easic.com/vmc-uses-easic-to-achieve-24-756-ths-bitcoin-miner/

Additional important news for shareholders from Ken via the Advisory Board:

First units on schedule for second half of November.

PR will post this formally shortly (re: press release)

I'm okay with getting post from the community, as long as they are on topic and relevant to the discussion.  Unfortunately, that is a hard goal to accomplish in a non-moderated thread.  ActM has gained notoriety, and unfortunately, a fuck ton of morons to the discussion.

Something something.... Don't put all your eggs in one basket... Something something... Diversification is key.

Seriously, though, this thread has gone to shit.  I do not care who is putting their money where.  Do you think you deserve a pat on the head for jumping ship and going back to AM?  Good for you sonny boy.  Guess what... I own AM too.  You want to know something else?  I also own LC... GASP!  Furthermore, almost everyone here does as well.   Ready for me to go full Shyamalan up in here?  You still own a reasonable amount of ActM too.  How do I know?  Because the only ones in here posting, from VBS to crumbs, have a monetary interest in this company.  

Can we please have a moderated ActiveMining thread started by PR, so we can get legitimate updates, that do not get immediately snuffed out by all the bullshit?

oh thank you, finally I got it

You are doing it backwards

we understood it, you can stop to keep repeating it, this is the third time

Guys, what's the deal with this??

Office Address:

Active Mining Corporation (Belize)
95 Wilton Road
Suite 3
London
SW1V 1BZ
United Kingdom
Fax: +44 (0)20 3004 1756

Lol, but seriously, Enough of this bull crap. There's risk to all these stocks. No doubt about it.

I've been accumulating a good number of shares from these prices. I hope it continues to go down, it's turning into a better opportunity every day. One thing to remember is that there's still ~.0025 that will be paid to the first 10,000,000 shares before ACTM sees any of it. The way I look at it -- ACTM will have access to their chips at about the price it takes to make them. This will give them an advantage over most other mining companies. Maybe we won't have the best/cheapest/most efficient chip? Who knows... but we've already paid for the expensive part, the research and development. We know that eAsic is a successful company from their 900% growth rate last year.

I'm sure that labcoin will also go up. It definitely has more upward potential than ACTM due to having 2/5's of the shares. That's great! Good investment, now go make a make a thread comparing various investments. I've done well from both, but I believe Actm will see higher prices in the future. If you disagree, sell me your shares and leave this thread. Stop the childlike banter.

If you care about the ACTM investors, and you want to warn them of the 'impending doom', maybe the best thing for them is to learn the hard way. It's not your job to protect other people (unless you want to get more shares yourself). And honestly, while I haven't been contributing to the nonsense, I've been enjoying the low prices.

This thread looks a lot cleaner after ignoring pankkake, icebreaker, and pheaonix.

edit:added crumbs, bargraphics, and mabsark to ignore list.

I said one of their first customers, probably not their very first of all time. But they would need to get "early access", which would mean even tighter NDA's then usual, I would assume.

Yup, I've failed. Bye crumbs. /ignore

I ignore the clown and then you quote him... If you see his "ignore" button golden yellow that's a hint that we don't want to see his posts OR him quoted.

For the record, according to LorenzoMoney's post history, he hasn't posted on any other security-related threads in the last 4 weeks. I don't know what you are trying to say, but clearly he doesn't need your sage advice. Also, look up the definition of consecutive.

That thread is pretty embarrassing -- a bunch of snarky *consecutive* posts by you.  
Protip:  If no one replies to your post, it's because no one cares -- don't post again.  And don't go around trolling other threads for fresh users to troll.

Picture is of Violin Memory announcing their use of eASIC Nextreme-2T (45nm) back in February.

The fact that they hint at future 28nm (eASIC Nextreme-3) before Seagate confirmed in August suggests Ken was not their first customer.

Boys....Children.....THIS is the Official Active Mining Discussion Thread.
Much of your silliness belongs here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/activemining-overview-and-speculation-thread-254930
ActiveMining Overview and Speculation Thread

That is where I have posted about my observations regarding the recent terrible, horrible, unforgiveable, unrecoverable price drop of ActM.......

..........

Crumbs long since made the ignore list!

Nothing wrong with good questions as long as you listen to good answers. I've questioned a lot about this stock myself.

However, there's asking questions and then there is borderline trolling. On the Growth stock you come across as trouble making to be honest, quite personal about it, and not very pleasant either. Maybe you genuinely don't realise this. Besides, if you don't like the look of a stock, don't deal in it.

You could have and should have sold your 180,000 shares for 0.0045 weeks ago, when I went all out.   

180k * 0.003 = 540 BTC
180k * 0.0045 = 810 BTC

Your stubbornness only cost you 170 BTC ($24,000).  Good job, you're a real Pro at Bitcoin investing (NOT!)

You listen to iCEBREAKER, or you make a fool or yourself and lose a lot of money.  That's the law, no exceptions.   

I'm willing to takeover whatever is left in your failed heap of securities for only $10k + 20% of our profits.

Sorry, I would have offered sooner but mistakenly thought you knew what you were doing.   

Lolz, what did Ken do differently, other than say "I can't tell you 'coz: NDA!"
Be consistent plox.