Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 128. (Read 771280 times)

I don't need to answer to you, dude. I've been a shareholder since IPO and I've been a regular in #ActiveMining for several months. Sorry I don't post in this clusterfuck of a thread enough to be considered important to you.

Really another member that joined today.   And who might you be? Introduce yourself.  Now that Crumbs and espically VE can only be taken as serious as a my little pony tea set...will we be seeing more of these new "shareholders", or is this their death rattle till they pop....and we see them on the news?

This absolutely fucking infuriates me.

It's funny that you would say that. Gerald did make it extremely clear that one of the main reasons ActiveMining doesn't give out any detailed information is due to them originally telling you about the eASIC deal before it was confirmed and you harassing eASIC to the point where the deal almost fell through.

While I don't think this is a legitimate reason for ActM to hold back information to it's shareholders, from the sounds of it you have done more to harm this company than any actual troll out there.

so bargraphics, are you offended that Ken doesn't even want to talk to you? 

Believe it or not you can't just whip your camera out and take pictures on private property.

You also don't get to "expect" anything. I already explained that it was told to me to wait for Ken for the questions so that's what I'll be doing. I already told you that I'll be writing a report and it might not be exactly what you want but it will be what you get. If you want something specific then go visit yourself (they have no problems with visitors) or find someone you trust in springfield to do it.

Sure. In addition, I'll be glad to help to set this up (i.e. scripts for migration from old platform, instructions, etc).

Should have at least got pictures of the inside... why didn't that happen?

What specifically did you ask and talk about?

I was expecting a Q/A report... even if he deferred, state it.

Should have at least got pictures of the inside... why didn't that happen?

What specifically did you ask and talk about?

I was expecting a Q/A report... even if he deferred, state it.

Jo, thanks for saying it's not personal.  I can deal with the personal stuff although it genuinely gets to me when people call into doubt my honesty.  If you were to look back at my posts the pattern you would notice is that my contributions are fairly level  headed and indeed pro-ActM until a fudster or troll turn up and I then go for the jugular.  This is because I can not abide injustice and will always stick up for people where I see wrong doing.  Even with my efforts I still think there is an enormous imbalance of people who hate on Ken and if I thought this could potentially lead to him throwing in the towel at some point then why would I not attempt to address this as best I could when I had so much to lose if the project failed?
I find it amazing that there are people who believe that a cheerleader is more dangerous than a fudster and troll as I understand a cheerleader to be someone who cheerleads because they believe in a company.  If a cheerleader is someone who may not believe in a company but promotes them then I am no cheerleader.
Now people can take what I say with a pinch of salt all they like, that's fine, but when I share information from the kindness of my own heart by quoting the CEO's PM's, how long until that CEO exposes my lies if I am publicly tampering with his words?
Edit: Jo to give you a better understanding of my posts and my mindset, I'll say this.  I'm an amateur endurance athlete believe it or not, and if I ever accepted that failure was a possibility in any challenge, then I wouldn't get out of bed in the morning.  Perhaps I recognise that tenacity in Ken.

Thanks for the update Bargraphics and I look forward to hearing about your discussions with Ken!  Please try and take some photos (any photos, even if it's something we've already seen)...thanks again!

VolanicErupter...Ken & co. aren't trying to blame you for anything.  They just realized that they shouldn't have been giving out so much important information to singular people (especially if he or she is an investor).  It looks like Ken's way of dealing with this is to keep his mouth shut until he is ready to announce certain details.  I agree with his policy although there are a few subjects that I think he should clarify (such as what has shipped?).

Thanks for the update Bargraphics and I look forward to hearing about your discussions with Ken!  Please try and take some photos (any photos, even if it's something we've already seen)...thanks again!

VolanicErupter...Ken & co. aren't trying to blame you for anything.  They just realized that they shouldn't have been giving out so much important information to singular people (especially if he or she is an investor).  It looks like Ken's way of dealing with this is to keep his mouth shut until he is ready to announce certain details.  I agree with his policy although there are a few subjects that I think he should clarify (such as what has shipped?).