omfg. What were are saying is very very different.
kleeck says: X is not a Ponzi scheme
minerpart says: 100% wrong! X is not a Ponzi scheme.
Not sure what's "very very different" about these two.
Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 462. (Read 771288 times)
October 15, 2013, 11:20:42 AM
kleeck says: X is not a Ponzi scheme
minerpart says: 100% wrong! X is not a Ponzi scheme.
Not sure what's "very very different" about these two.
October 15, 2013, 11:11:17 AM
Will we still be seeing a sales report today?
he already gave his quarterly report. 1.3mil. He didn't want to spend more than 20 seconds on it because he's soooo busy building super machines.
October 15, 2013, 11:09:43 AM
Will we still be seeing a sales report today?
October 15, 2013, 10:44:18 AM
October 15, 2013, 09:48:56 AM
omfg. What were are saying is very very different.
October 15, 2013, 09:38:30 AM
I've had the ponzi argument via public forum on multiple occasions. It comes down to people not knowing what a ponzi scheme is. Early adopters profiting more than late comers =/= ponzi scheme.
100% incorrect, quite ironically.
What about this is incorrect?
In a Ponzie early investors may profit but usually they just think they are profiting as the are paid unrealistic amounts of interest in their investment - that is to attract in more victims. The late comers lose everything as the scam is run down. Its not about late comers getting a smaller slice of the pie, all of their money is taken and they see none of it back.
So, you're both actually saying the exactly the same thing, but you've decided to insist that kleeck is 100% incorrect. Makes perfect sense.
October 15, 2013, 09:22:56 AM
I've had the ponzi argument via public forum on multiple occasions. It comes down to people not knowing what a ponzi scheme is. Early adopters profiting more than late comers =/= ponzi scheme.
100% incorrect, quite ironically.
What about this is incorrect?
In a Ponzi early investors may profit but usually they just think they are profiting as they are paid unrealistic amounts of interest on their investment - that is to attract in more victims. The late comers lose everything (early investors may lose 80% or more) as the scam is run down. Its not about late comers getting a smaller slice of a pie, all of their money is taken and they see none of it back.
October 15, 2013, 08:46:31 AM
drawingthesun-
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
He just says so much stupid!
I really need to learn to leave him alone.
He's probably getting paid for what he does. That or he's in dire need of a fleshlight.
So just ignore him. If nobody's replying to his shit talk then maybe he won't get paid.
October 15, 2013, 08:40:34 AM
drawingthesun-
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
He just says so much stupid!
I really need to learn to leave him alone.
October 15, 2013, 08:38:15 AM
drawingthesun-
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
what is it about DON'T FEED THE TROLLS that you don't understand exactly?
October 15, 2013, 08:26:55 AM
crumble has only one agenda and that is to damage ActM any way he can.
This alone makes it Ken's duty to remove all of his posts regardless of content.
From now on I am reporting every single post he makes and would encourage everyone else to do the same.
This guy is a cancer and needs to be cut out.
This alone makes it Ken's duty to remove all of his posts regardless of content.
From now on I am reporting every single post he makes and would encourage everyone else to do the same.
This guy is a cancer and needs to be cut out.
Is there someone who doesn't have him ignored?
October 15, 2013, 08:23:15 AM
crumble has only one agenda and that is to damage ActM any way he can.
This alone makes it Ken's duty to remove all of his posts regardless of content.
From now on I am reporting every single post he makes and would encourage everyone else to do the same.
This guy is a cancer and needs to be cut out.
This alone makes it Ken's duty to remove all of his posts regardless of content.
From now on I am reporting every single post he makes and would encourage everyone else to do the same.
This guy is a cancer and needs to be cut out.
October 15, 2013, 07:41:00 AM
Let the first one who didn't invest in a "virtual entity" registered in Belize, currently trading at a fraction of its IPO price, throw the first stone 
This is one of your worst arguments, I know someone that has a successful manufacturing business registered in Belize and based in Malaysia. This is not an uncommon thing to do.
I know someone who won the lottery. Doesn't mean that *you* should make buying scratch tickets your financial plan. You stubbornly ignored my advice, now it's a bit too late for you. No one's buying. Enjoy.
I'm not telling people to buy, in fact when people ask I tell them its a terrible buy. I am being honest.
Back to the facts, many companies are registered in various offshore countries and this is not an abnormal thing to do.
The point I am trying to make is whilst Active Mining has some really bad things going for it, the registered in Belize is not one of them and you are being a troll bringing that up over and over again.
The more stupid things you say, the less effect your words have.
October 15, 2013, 07:37:30 AM
Let the first one who didn't invest in a "virtual entity" registered in Belize, currently trading at a fraction of its IPO price, throw the first stone
This is one of your worst arguments, I know someone that has a successful manufacturing business registered in Belize and based in Malaysia. This is not an uncommon thing to do.
I know someone who won the lottery. Doesn't mean that *you* should make buying scratch tickets your financial plan. You stubbornly ignored my advice, now it's a bit too late for you. No one's buying. Enjoy.
October 15, 2013, 07:20:56 AM
I've had the ponzi argument via public forum on multiple occasions. It comes down to people not knowing what a ponzi scheme is. Early adopters profiting more than late comers =/= ponzi scheme.
Yeah, it would be the similar to suggesting that Apple is running a ponzi scheme since those who purchased stock when the company was circling the toilet in the 2001 profited when the stock when to over $400/share. Ponzi and scam have to be the most overused words by financially ignorant internet trolls.
October 15, 2013, 07:20:06 AM
Let the first one who didn't invest in a "virtual entity" registered in Belize, currently trading at a fraction of its IPO price, throw the first stone
This is one of your worst arguments, I know someone that has a successful manufacturing business registered in Belize and based in Malaysia. This is not an uncommon thing to do.
October 15, 2013, 07:17:35 AM
I think that's being just a bit complacent. It's the first mention of VMC on Bloomberg as far as I know, it's their latest BTC 'big splash', it directly quotes our CEO, it clearly sets out the competition to VMC.
Any serious investor in tradtitional markets who is now interested in BTC and BTC mining would likely read this article. There are only 7 comments, three are substantive and of interest, and one was accusing VMC of being a scam. That post was a serious threat. That is why it was written.
Any serious investor in tradtitional markets who is now interested in BTC and BTC mining would likely read this article. There are only 7 comments, three are substantive and of interest, and one was accusing VMC of being a scam. That post was a serious threat. That is why it was written.
Agreed, specific accusations against Ken are worse than general scam/ponzi comments. But I would say just flag, get it removed and move on. We're not held hostage to a few malcontents or trolls.
October 15, 2013, 07:12:57 AM
I've had the ponzi argument via public forum on multiple occasions. It comes down to people not knowing what a ponzi scheme is. Early adopters profiting more than late comers =/= ponzi scheme.
100% incorrect, quite ironically.
What about this is incorrect?
October 15, 2013, 07:10:34 AM
I've had the ponzi argument via public forum on multiple occasions. It comes down to people not knowing what a ponzi scheme is. Early adopters profiting more than late comers =/= ponzi scheme.
100% incorrect, quite ironically.
October 15, 2013, 07:09:24 AM
I think that's being just a bit complacent. It's the first mention of VMC on Bloomberg as far as I know, it's their latest BTC 'big splash', it directly quotes our CEO, it clearly sets out the competition to VMC.
Any serious investor in tradtitional markets who is now interested in BTC and BTC mining would likely read this article. There are only 7 comments, three are substantive and of interest, and one was accusing VMC of being a scam. That post was a serious threat. That is why it was written.
Any serious investor in tradtitional markets who is now interested in BTC and BTC mining would likely read this article. There are only 7 comments, three are substantive and of interest, and one was accusing VMC of being a scam. That post was a serious threat. That is why it was written.
Jump to: