Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 89. (Read 771280 times)

@Uyko:

dude you disappear with funds that don't belong to you for MONTHS with no plausible explanation whatsoever as to what happened to OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY and then you have the nerve to come in here and troll?

gimme a fucken break. At least here you know where your shit is and that it still exists… you cannot say the same to other people.

You've got quite a mess to clean up. I suggest you GTFO of here and look somewhere else to do that job. Stop side stepping the issue.

@Uyko:

dude you disappear with funds that don't belong to you for MONTHS with no plausible explanation whatsoever as to what happened to OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY and then you have the nerve to come in here and troll?

gimme a fucken break. At least here you know where your shit is and that it still exists… you cannot say the same to other people.

You've got quite a mess to clean up. I suggest you GTFO of here and look somewhere else to do that job. Stop side stepping the issue.

...
Wow.   You could not write this script for a reality TV series.   
TL/DR:  Some older gent that seems to know about as much about technology as columbo, is quoting "law" to some other guy and insisting that the "laws" allow him to "take" the illegally listed, promoted and distributed shares in his "virtual" company that seems to be in "reality" a disaster.
This is great...    Would this be tried in federal court?   Would officers of the court be obligated to ask the SEC to charge Ken before the civil case is tried?   Please keep me up on this script, I am typing my show proposal now.   Watch out Duck Dynasty because this gong show is going to be far more entertaining.

Also from PM:


I appreciate your 'good luck to sue us'. That's a real show of character.
I suggest all shareholders take heed of this warning.
What is wrong with posting your history? Are you afraid of something? You seem pretty concerned if your willing to make threats over it.

Notice was given 45 days before the transfer from BitFunder to WeExchange.
The site was shutting down and it was known to you that the only method of bitcoin transfer is via WeExchange which you accepted and used.

You should have no funds left on BitFunder. Any account that was properly linked (Which would be the ActM official account) had its full balance transferred. I think everyone is well aware that only a few people who had linking issues with weex have a small stuck balance.

How is it you have an account with 38btc that is not ActM that you are linking into this?
How many more accounts exactly did you create for trading on BitFunder than the handful I know of?
I suppose I will have to do a more in depth search on all of you ip addresses, linked accounts and addresses.
Why have you not claimed or reported this stuck 38btc prior?
You have not mentioned the 6% claimed from the portal yet either and subtracted that.

In the end, your argument is that I owe you XXX btc personally.
If your argument holds up then that means you are not the only debtor.
If this was the case, as someone mentioned prior, any funds of mine would need to be proportionally distributed.
This is not a mechanics lien.  You did not do work or provide services. You do not have first right to the funds.
Also I see you are not including "legal costs" of unspecified amounts into what you plan to take from any proceeds.
It sounds like no matter what, your intention it to keep 100% for your personal issues.

And just because you are CEO of a company does not mean you can abuse that authority on behalf of your own personal
problems and desires.

So to be clear, you are using your position as CEO of a company to force a sale of a shareholders shares to ensure your personal BTC losses are covered before other debtors can claim their portion when you have absolutely no evidence to show that the shareholder has directly owes you anything.

You do understand the difference between a corporation and an individual?
I hope you have this same understanding with accounting practices and funds.

WeExchange has a debt to many individuals and not just you.

Again, why the sudden rush and need to sell the shares? Why can't they just be locked worst case scenario?
You seem desperate. Why? I figure it will take you at least 2~3 more months to finish buying back ActM shares.
Why the need for threats? What is it you are so afraid of?

I bet people would love to see the complete shareholder listing as it stands. Would probably be more interesting
if ownership names could be included / proven.

Also, for a lien you must file something, somewhere with a valid reason and provide notification to the person you are filing against.
Normally, unless it is a mechanics lien, you file a lien against a person or entity.

I think you need to talk to your Belize lawyers and not whatever lawyer gave you a book quote rather than an official statutory listing.
(Personally, I would fire that lawyer and hire a new one.)

I found your link very interesting though. How about linking some documentation regarding Belize Corporate law instead?
Unless this is a confession that you are operating as a Indian entity and these are shares of an Indian entity?
You do realize that book is about Corporate laws in India... right? Your lawyer must be short on time and not taken notice.
Next time you are gasping at straws, you should check the first few chapters for relevance and stop trying to mislead people.

(For those of you who are curious, start with page 2. Definition of a company regarding the Companies Act of 1956. (India) and
the following line of "a company formed and registered under previous Company Laws in India."
I am going to go out of my way to say that you have had absolutely zero legal advice and are acting solely based on random google searches
and relying on "Well let him try something." rather than doing things properly.
I truly hope for those who have invested into ActM that you run your business better than this.

Please stop being inconsistent and show people if you actually have an understanding of the things you are talking about.
It's almost like you are purposefully misleading people.

(For anyone curious, feel free to call a US corporate lawyer for a free consultation and ask about shareholder rights and liens.)
Then again, that's US law, not Brazilian.

I response to your unofficial "notice of lien" hereby request that you post the contact information for your corporate Belize lawyers or PM it to me so I can contact them to make arrangements so this can be handled properly and officially. I will make sure that any documents are released to the public so they are fully aware of the situation.

Please keep in mind that your professional manner in handling this situation dictates how you will and ActM will be viewed going forward.
As a ActM shareholder and I am sure many others agree, if ActM is to succeed, it must act properly and not arbitrarily or expose the
company to unnecessary risks.

Stop acting so desperate and do things right.

Thank You,
Ukyo

Just throwing this out there. But whoever is buying shares on Crypto Trade right now is basically giving Ukyo a premium for his shares. $8 a pop. Now honestly, I think Ken should put Ukyo's shares on some lockdown until Ukyo pays Ken or they work out some other civilized agreement. From that point forward Ukyo should have full access to his remaining shares to do with as he pleases.

Ken doesn't need to spend anymore time on this issue. Why fight over 106 BTC when he believes (a lot of people on this thread believe) that there is a bigger fish in the pond (getting these chips made; sold and mining)

Honestly I am not trying to divert anyone's attention from anything.
Right now Weex owes a lot of btc to a lot of people.
To help ease things I am trying to use my ActM shares towards that.

In the meantime, Ken is in effect trying to steal the funds and pay himself personally.
(and as quickly as possible while misdirecting everyone as to the nature of the funds and his rights to do what he pleases with them)

And the great god Ken has made it quite clear that should any shareholder not agree with his actions that are based solely on his feelings/emotions and not backed my any legal nature, then he wishes them the best of luck to try to do anything about it.

Honestly I am not trying to divert anyone's attention from anything.
Right now Weex owes a lot of btc to a lot of people.
To help ease things I am trying to use my ActM shares towards that.

In the meantime, Ken is in effect trying to steal the funds and pay himself personally.
(and as quickly as possible while misdirecting everyone as to the nature of the funds and his rights to do what he pleases with them)

And the great god Ken has made it quite clear that should any shareholder not agree with his actions that are based solely on his feelings/emotions and not backed my any legal nature, then he wishes them the best of luck to try to do anything about it.

No need for that mate.  So when will you be paying back this money then?

Look the ball is in your court so just do what you know is right.  The community deserve full disclosure.  Jesus, what are you doing on this thread throwing shit around like that for when you know how serious your situation is?  It's not Ken that's under the microscope here, although you're clearly trying to play the diversionary card.  They are going to throw away the keys if your not careful so tread carefully.

No need for that mate.  So when will you be paying back this money then?

Ukyo you are funny saying that someone will be judged on how they handle a situation.  Comedy gold.

Just do the honourable thing and pay back the money that you owe ActM.  It really is that simple.

Can't believe Ukyo has the nerve to be posting this while he is scamming people out of millions of dollars. Scumbag of the year award.

Ken seems to think that because he's scamming US customers with a foreign registered company he's going to get away with it.  We don't need to travel to Belize to sue you.  We'll do it in your own backyard.