Pages:
Author

Topic: Additional subsidy for P2Pool users: 1-3btc/day (Read 29277 times)

legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
BTCLife.global participant
To encourage users to use P2Pool, I'm sending 1-3btc every 24hrs to all the miners on P2Pool (proportionally).

I wish that someone did the same these days...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Why is it that p2pool is (as stated in an earlier post on this topic) considered to incur more losses than other pools?  I thought it was marginally better .. wonder which is right? ;-)
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
I just used some bitcoins from the Bitcoin Faucet fund to compensate the p2pool miners who's block was orphaned in the Big Chain Fork.

Transaction id 6521b0513f3077a983b82eb92cc95ecc24ad2a7ca3afdba082ef71ea8d25a868

PS: this was a one-time thing, don't expect orphan blockss in the future to get paid for!

thanks gavin Smiley
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
I just used some bitcoins from the Bitcoin Faucet fund to compensate the p2pool miners who's block was orphaned in the Big Chain Fork.

Transaction id 6521b0513f3077a983b82eb92cc95ecc24ad2a7ca3afdba082ef71ea8d25a868

PS: this was a one-time thing, don't expect orphan blockss in the future to get paid for!

I must say this was unexpected and a very pleasant surprise. Thanks !
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 2216
Chief Scientist
I just used some bitcoins from the Bitcoin Faucet fund to compensate the p2pool miners who's block was orphaned in the Big Chain Fork.

Transaction id 6521b0513f3077a983b82eb92cc95ecc24ad2a7ca3afdba082ef71ea8d25a868

PS: this was a one-time thing, don't expect orphan blockss in the future to get paid for!
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....
Sounds great. I'd be willing to take a bribe/bung/payoff or whatever you want to call it to come back & mine there. But it would have to be an ongoing thing, say, a weekly payment that will cover my losses compared to mining at a functional pool.

I'd also want my frontal lobotomy paid for. Up front of course...... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
i think subsidys could atract new miners (since we need more GH) to p2pool, anyone interested in reviving this?
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
nope

2bad. I've just updated the p2pool client to v8.2
still worth it, soon there will be less orphans Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1002
nope

2bad. I've just updated the p2pool client to v8.2
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
nope
hero member
Activity: 575
Merit: 500
The North Remembers
Is anyone still doing this?
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1063
Gerald Davis
Setting up one server for multiple miners isn't that much more work.  I think the bigger issue, and it is more easily solved, is monitoring.  I think a monitoring tool like BAMT's mgpumon would really help push some farms over, especially if it could send out alerts of idle miners (like many pools do).  I'll put up 5BTC for any monitor that I can access over ssh with a browser to monitor rigs running cgminer to a single p2pool node. And another .5 for 10 days to join coretechs if someone can tell me how to do it from a gui wallet.

EDITED

This.  Trying to cram p2pool and blockchain into BAMT or Linuxcoin is hugely wasteful, complicated and likely going to lead to all kinds of problems.  Anyone suggesting it likely doesn't have more than 1 or 2 rigs.

Most large miners have a setup like this:

BAMT on rig #1  \
BAMT on rig #2   \
BAMT on rig #3    \
...                        /  ------> conventional mining pool
BAMT on rig #11  /
BAMT on rig #12 /

Having 12 copies of block chain and 12 instances of p2pool and 12 payment address (or yet another thing to configure across 12 machines) make absolutely no sense when you can do this

BAMT on rig #1  \
BAMT on rig #2   \
BAMT on rig #3    \
...                        /  ------> machine on the LAN running p2pool (or public p2pool instance)
BAMT on rig #11  /
BAMT on rig #12 /

For the same reason cgminer integration is likely a dead end.  Anyone with 2+ rigs is better served by having a "p2pool" machine.  It doesn't even need to be a mining rig.
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
Someone made a donation to the address I list on p2pool.info.  Over the next few days, I will be sending it to the p2pool miners using the patron_sendmany algorithm.  

Here is the list of transactions:

2/28/12 - http://blockchain.info/tx/7f5658c8cd2868cfc87e1ed921be74b80c06b0cb8c60b98fa709b0a23d971c31
2/29/12 - http://blockchain.info/tx/02cfe0ee7caa9342127b6c2255e22033c386bc9863da9e837e45c0e3bb7ddbca
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
It is an address of my mtgox account.
Are mtgox accounts ok with "generation" transactions? Some online wallets don't like those.
Never had a problem up to now with more than 20 transactions.
In blockchain.info I can see mtgox is moving some amounts out of this address but my balance doesn't change after the moves nor this moves appear inside my mtgox transaction log.
staff
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382
There is a small miner pool built into the send many. People who are below a certain point are entered into a lottery and one person randomly gets the reward. This is to cut down on very many very small transactions.

Or change the threshold to 0: http://forre.st:9332/patron_sendmany?total=1&thresh=0. The default threshold is 0.01 (people who would be paid under 0.01 are in the 'lottery'), because outputs below 0.01 will result in needing a fee.
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 250
It is an address of my mtgox account.
Are mtgox accounts ok with "generation" transactions? Some online wallets don't like those.
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
So what is my problem?
why don't I appear in http://forre.st:9332/patron_sendmany?total=1 ?
Pages:
Jump to: