Topic: All about bounty payments and its effect to the project - page 2. (Read 2133 times)
I equally do Bounties, before now I used to think that it's bounty hunters that crash the price of tokens too. I had a rethink when a project called Online.io sometime listed their tokens last year and Lock bounty payment for like 6 months. When bounty hunters were finally paid the token price was nothing to write home about. What about that?
I am also a big fan of payment by ethereum. That way both, the project and the bounty hunters can benefit. The price of the project remains stable and the bounty hunters gets their share without costing the project. So win win situation for both.
I fully agree with the author, bounty hunters are not to blame for the token dump, since the share of funds allocated to bounty does not exceed 5% of the number of tokens. It is all about the weakness of the team and the unattractiveness of the project, as a result, tokens are of no interest to potential investors.
Folks not just bounty hunters sell of at any given opportunity for various reasons including the fact of the volatility of the market. Such massive sell of most times lead to o dump
I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
Yeah that would be a good idea to pay bounty hunters with eth or bitcoins but I do not think that team handling the project will allow it because they need it more than the bounty hunters. The coin they created is not as valuable as eth and bitcoin for they still need to promote the coin or the project to the community. I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
And they do not care also if their coins will go down for the investors to hold and not to spend it cheaply as much as possible.
Most projects benefit from paying bounty hunters in tokens and not eth. I have seen projects where they had not up to 20 investors, which means that there will not be the required number of token holders needed to fulfil the requirement for listing, which is why they might need to pay bounty hunters with their tokens to increase the number of token holders. Another means that some of the imbibe, is to airdrop little to airdrop participants in order to increase their community.
Bounty hunter are getting the coin after their hardwork.so they just want to encargó their money. They just 3 to 5 % of total supply so i dont think they are solely responsible for dumping. But from crypto ecosystem the bounty hunter must be motivated by giving Them in form of usd or btc itself. They feel good And help the project to reach to mass
Even out of the 3-5%, we might still have only 1-2% being dumped while the rest are still with the many hunters that decide to hold for better price or just so because they believe in the project. But hunters are to blame for it. quite rational as well, for example, bounty hunters sell all their tokens immediately after getting a reward and that can have an effect on the price of the token in the market when dumping simultaneously. I agree more if reward is given with eth or other altcoins.
The idea of bounty hunters selling their tokens immediately after getting rewards which affects the pricing on the market is most times false, how can bounty hunters who received just 1-5% of funds allocation dump to affect pricing but I second the fact that bounty hunters should rather be paid in eth or other altcoins which will be a real evidence to note if a project will still dump or not.
Bounty hunter are getting the coin after their hardwork.so they just want to encargó their money. They just 3 to 5 % of total supply so i dont think they are solely responsible for dumping. But from crypto ecosystem the bounty hunter must be motivated by giving Them in form of usd or btc itself. They feel good And help the project to reach to mass
Opinions of people are completely different, some believe that now truly bounty hunters are breaking prices, but I see that this is not the case and it seems to me that all of this is exclusively investors and the overall situation in the market.
After get paid bounty hunters and token listed exchange many bounty hunters sell their token so crpto is dump and start bear . Crypto market. By participate bounty you will know best ICOs and should do ICOs invest, problem isn't hunters it's big matter of fall cryptocurrency.
Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.
But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spiritI don't understand this logic. Bounty payments represent around 1% of the total revenue. So you are saying that in case this 1% is paid in ETH or BTC, the project will run in to loss? If that is true, then the project will be a very weak one. I have been arguing for the bounty payments to be made in ETH for a long time. But the ICO promoters are against it, for obvious reasons.
if I remember again, there were a number of projects that I joined and was paid with eth and it proved that the project was indeed good. unlike projects that pay with tokens that are mostly scam or have no value.
I don't really understand why so many people say that bounty hunters are the main cause of dumps because I think the bounty hunters only get a few tokens, unlike investors or teams, only a few percent, and as you know that such small allocations must be shared with all the bounty hunters who took part in the project while not all of them wanted to sell, there were some who tried to hold the coins, so it was probably a bounty hunter to make the dump smaller, right? because not everything sells, so I will ask you, are you really sure that a dump happened because of a bounty hunter's fault?
I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
Why always putting blame on bounty hunters when the price was dropping, actually the rewards for bounty hunters was not affect that much because they just giving a bounty hunter a small amount for their hardwork why don't you think that the owner itself sometimes the reason why the price is dropping they have the huge amount or let say they have the bigger allocation for each the member sometimes if the member see the price was profit then they will be taking advantage on it. I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
A lot of useful information about bounty hunters and that really use bounty payments. I think that all these bounty does not affect the course of the price in general, of course at the very beginning they can affect, but in general it has no effect.
Of course, bounty hunters often sell tokens at a low price and because of this the price of this token falls, but investors and the team themselves are also very often involved in it, so if the project is good and will continue to evolve, then in the future the price of this token will increase.
Stop already groundlessly accusing the Bounty Hunters. When the cryptocurrency market was in a much better condition, then the projects developed quite actively. At the same time, participants in Bounty companies did not influence the development of these projects. We should not make baseless accusations.after all, if the project is potentially good, the bounty hunter might not sell their coins because they also want a great advantage.
This is about how good that project is.
I don't blame bounty Hunters for selling their tokens as soon as they get paid after the bounty campaign because they are not investors, but I blame the developers who cannot pay for advert in Bitcoin or ethereum because they want free promoters which I believe has its own consequences.
In fact, not all bounty hunters will immediately sell tokens. and the amount of bounty tokens will not exceed 2% of the total amount of coins. its impact is very limited. they pay the hunter with the token of the project. it is good for the circulation of this coin.
I don't think bounty hunters selling off their 1 to 5% of the total allocation of a project will have any significant influence on the value of a project. If the project is solid and the team are doing all what's needed of them to do, its value will also grow even with the dumping of bounty tokens.
Hunters will always sell in the minus. Better at least some money than nothing at all. If there is no demand for a coin, do not blame the hunters.
we have to love our token. just look at future dont't sell it fast when going to market place. look at past when token new begining. Jump to: